Skip to content
Crabill Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Crabill Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
38
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$3.8MArts & Culture$873kHealth$599kPhilanthropy$370kHousing & Shelter$270kHuman Services$178kFood & Nutrition$150kInternational$110kOther$0
02FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $299k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $800k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$131M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BRANSON SCHOOL$1,100,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD INC$150,000
YELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$100,000
CAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION$100,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$50,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$50,000
OPPORTUNITIES FOR INDIVIDUAL CHANGE (OIC) OF CLARK COUNTY$50,000
SPRINGFIELD HISTORIC LANDMARK PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC$50,000
PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD AND CLARK COUNTY$50,000
TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY$50,000
THE BRANSON SCHOOL$50,000
SPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART$25,000
SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY$25,000
SPRINGFIELD HISTORIC LANDMARK PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $249k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD AND CLARK COUNTY: $50k → 15%PROJECT WOMAN: $25k → 15%CITILOOKOUT: $25k → 15%CITILOOKOUT: $25k → 15%CITILOOKOUT: $20k → 15%CITY HOPE SAN FRANCISCO: $1k → 10%OIC OF CLARK COUNTY INC: $50k → 15%OPPORTUNITIES FOR INDIVIDUAL CHANGE (OIC) OF CLARK COUNTY: $50k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
NY
OH
PA
CA
MO
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Crabill Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Crabill Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.0M · 23 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
17

Total granted

$5.0M
$781k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+52%

Still filing today

74%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $284k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BRANSON SCHOOL
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +41%
  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $300k · revenue +23%
  • CP
    CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $224k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • WA
    WALKER ART CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $350k · revenue +155%
  • AH
    ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +22%
  • SF
    SPRINGFIELD FAMILY YMCA
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
3
Cincinnati Preservation Association

To empower and educate people to value, preserve and save greater cincinnati's historic buildings, communities, landscapes and stories.

Arts & Culture
4
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
5
League of California Community Foundations

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy
6
IMPACT100 Oakland County

Provide high impact grants to non profits serving oakland county.

—
7
Central Neighborhood Health Foundation

The organization's mission is to minimize disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior-quality, patient-centered healthcare through an integrated delivery system for underserved and vulnerable multi-ethnic…

Health
8
The Cleveland Foundation

Enhance the lives of all residents of greater cleveland, now and for generations to come, by working together with our donors to build community endowment, address needs through grantmaking, and provide leadership on key community issues.

Philanthropy
9
The Democracy Collaborative Foundation Inc

See schedule othe democracy collaborative was established in 2000 to advance understanding of democracy for the 21st century and to promote emerging strategies and innovations in community development that enhance democratic life. in…

Education
10
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
11
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
12
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Walker Art Center; the most unlike its peers is City Hope San Francisco. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
27/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BRANSON SCHOOL: $1,900,000 · EducationTHE BRANSON SCHOOLTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $300,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD…OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $300,000 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION+5 more: $120,000 · EducationCATHEDRAL SCHOOL FOR BOYS: $1,064,500 · OtherCATHEDRAL SCHOOL FOR BOYSSPRINGFIELD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $162,000 · OtherSPRINGFIELD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICTCLARK COUNTY COMBINED HEALTH DISTRICT: $90,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $75,000 · OtherCAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · OtherOHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $75,000 · Other+20 more: $408,500 · Other+20 moreWALKER ART CENTER: $350,000 · Arts & CultureWALKER ART C…SPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART: $160,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGFIELD …ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureARMAND HAMME…SPRINGFIELD HISTORIC LANDMARK PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGFIELD …SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $40,000 · Arts & CultureCLARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $30,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $200,000 · PhilanthropyTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $110,000 · PhilanthropyYELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC: $50,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $223,685 · HealthROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER: $150,000 · HealthMCKINLEY HALL INC: $15,000 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD: $160,000 · Community Improvement1159 SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $74,000 · Community ImprovementTHE CONSCIOUS CONNECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $15,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $7,500 · Community ImprovementOPPORTUNITIES FOR INDIVIDUAL CHANGE INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY: $75,000 · Human ServicesCITILOOKOUT: $70,000 · Human Services+2 more: $3,500 · Human Services
Education$2,620,000Other$1,975,000Arts & Culture$755,000Philanthropy$480,000Health$388,685Community Improvement$256,500Human Services$248,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BRANSON SCHOOL: $1,900,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetWALKER ART CENTER: $350,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $223,685 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART: $160,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD: $160,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER: $150,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $110,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES FOR INDIVIDUAL CHANGE INC: $100,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSPRINGFIELD HISTORIC LANDMARK PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetOHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY: $75,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budget1159 SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $74,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetCITILOOKOUT: $70,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetASPIRE P16 COLLABORATIVE: $50,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCLARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $30,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Greater Dayton Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HARTMAN ROCK GARDEN: $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetGLEN HELEN ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER OHIO POLICY CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetMCKINLEY HALL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CONSCIOUS CONNECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $15,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHE SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOVENANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetSCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC (SMART): $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF SPRINGFIELD INC: $7,500 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetSan Francisco Film Society: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF CLARK CHAMPAIGN & MADISON COUNTIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCenter for Volunteer & Nonprofit Leadership: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY HOPE SAN FRANCISCO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Springfield Found…Community Hospital He…Della Selsor Tr UwHarry and Violet Turn…Wilson Sheehan Founda…The United Way of Cla…Assurant FoundationDayton Foundation Dep…Walter S Quinlan Foun…Park National Corpora…The Dayton FoundationColumbus Foundation
The Springfield FoundationOH40.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Springfield Foundation · Community Hospital Health Services Foundation · Della Selsor Tr Uw · Harry and Violet Turner 95 Charitable Trust · Wilson Sheehan Foundation · The United Way of Clark Champaign & Madison Counties Inc · Assurant Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Walter S Quinlan Foundation · Park National Corporation Foundation · The Dayton Foundation · Columbus Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crabill Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crabill Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crabill Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home