Skip to content

· Private foundation

County North Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$421kArts & Culture$8k
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$890k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bowling Green State University$2,000
Kent State University$2,000
The Ohio State University$2,000
The University of Toledo$2,000
Bowling Green State University$2,000
Bowling Green State University$2,000
Kent State University$2,000
Defiance College$2,000
Kent State University$2,000
The Ohio State University$2,000
Bowling Green State University$2,000
Heidelberg University$2,000
Ohio University$2,000
The University of Toledo$2,000
Bowling Green State University$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 57% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Northwest State Community College Foundation: $25k → 8%University of Findlay: $3k → 9%Wright State: $2k → 9%The College of Wooster: $2k → 10%Ashland University: $2k → 11%Defiance College: $2k → 11%Miami University: $2k → 12%Heidelberg University: $2k → 12%Bowling Green State University: $4k → 12%Kent State University: $4k → 12%Walsh University: $2k → 13%Muskingum University: $3k → 14%The Ohio State University: $2k → 15%Marietta College: $2k → 15%Baldwin Wallace University: $2k → 17%The University of Toledo: $2k → 18%Franciscan University of Stubenville: $4k → 19%Ohio University: $2k → 22%Northwest State Community College Foundation: $8k → 8%The University of Findlay: $2k → 9%Wright State: $2k → 9%The College of Wooster: $2k → 10%Ashland University: $2k → 11%Defiance College: $2k → 11%Miami University: $2k → 12%Heidelberg University: $2k → 12%Bowling Green State University: $2k → 12%Kent State University: $2k → 12%Walsh University: $2k → 13%The Ohio State University: $2k → 15%Marietta College: $2k → 15%Baldwin Wallace University: $2k → 17%The University of Toledo: $2k → 18%Franciscan University of Stubenville: $2k → 19%Ohio University: $2k → 22%The University of Findlay: $2k → 9%Wright State: $2k → 9%The College of Wooster: $2k → 10%Ashland University: $2k → 11%Defiance College: $2k → 11%Miami University: $2k → 12%Heidelberg University: $2k → 12%Bowling Green State University: $2k → 12%Kent State University: $2k → 12%Walsh University: $2k → 13%The Ohio State University: $2k → 15%Baldwin Wallace University: $2k → 17%John Carroll University: $4k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of County North Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 88%.

County North Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$427k · 23 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
0

Total granted

$427k
$0

Still filing today

61%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NORTHWEST STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2020 · $33k · revenue +293%
  • TU
    The University of Findlay
    5× · 2017–2022 · $10k · revenue +4%
  • TC
    THE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART
    4× · 2019–2022 · $8k · revenue +32%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Lehigh University

    The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

    Education
    2
    Delaware Valley University

    See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

    —
    3
    Otterbein University

    Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

    Education
    4
    Wilson College

    Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

    Education
    5
    Benedictine University

    Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

    Education
    6
    University of New Haven

    The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

    Education
    7
    Point Park University

    Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

    —
    8
    Saint Xavier University

    Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

    Education
    9
    Albright College

    As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

    Education
    10
    Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa

    We are a Catholic, co-educational, liberal arts university founded in 1843 by the Sisters of Charity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Dubuque, Iowa. Clarke educates students at the post-secondary level in the liberal arts and sciences, the…

    Education
    11
    Trinity University

    Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

    Education
    12
    Loyola University

    Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The College of Wooster; the most unlike its peers is Northwest State Community College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    05the grantee network

    14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    14/14
    Grantees still filing
    10/14
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Bowling Green State University: $73,000 · OtherBowling Green State UniversityThe Ohio State University: $72,000 · OtherThe Ohio State UniversityThe University of Toledo: $58,000 · OtherThe University of ToledoKENT STATE UNIVERSITY: $44,000 · OtherKENT STATE UNIVERSITYMIAMI UNIVERSITY: $14,000 · OtherOhio University: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $21,000 · Other+3 moreNORTHWEST STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $33,000 · EducationNORTHWEST STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE F…Heidelberg University: $16,000 · EducationHeidelberg UniversityThe University of Findlay: $10,000 · EducationThe University of FindlayTHE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART: $8,000 · EducationTHE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ARTBaldwin Wallace University: $8,000 · EducationBaldwin Wallace UniversityASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $8,000 · EducationASHLAND UNIVERSITYWalsh University Inc: $8,000 · EducationWalsh University IncTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $8,000 · EducationTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTERFRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $8,000 · EducationFRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVIL…John Carroll University: $8,000 · EducationJohn Carroll UniversityCAPITAL UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · EducationDEFIANCE COLLEGE: $6,000 · Education+2 more: $8,000 · Education+2 more
    Other$292,000Education$135,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHWEST STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetHeidelberg University: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Findlay: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBaldwin Wallace University: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWalsh University Inc: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJohn Carroll University: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDEFIANCE COLLEGE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMarietta College: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds NORTHWEST STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds Heidelberg University ↗
    • Who funds The University of Findlay ↗
    • Who funds THE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART ↗
    • Who funds Baldwin Wallace University ↗
    • Who funds ASHLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds Walsh University Inc ↗
    • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER ↗
    • Who funds FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE ↗
    • Who funds John Carroll University ↗
    • Who funds CAPITAL UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds DEFIANCE COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds Marietta College ↗
    • Who funds MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Columbus FoundationOH17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · The Ohio Foundation of Independent Colleges · The Cleveland Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization County North Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from County North Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to County North Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to County North Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on County North’s filings →

      More from the funding graph