Skip to content

· Public charity

Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity.

$7.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$438k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$30MPublic Benefit$16MFood & Nutrition$3.8MCivil Rights$2.1MEducation$1.9MCommunity Improvement$272kEmployment$262kArts & Culture$262kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $1,730,145, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,603,946 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,873,801 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $444k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.2M
$145,335
Median grant
6
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD VISION INC (WV)$437,895
DAI GLOBAL LLC (DAI)$287,315
CREATIVE ASSOCIATES$269,756
WELLINGTON PAGE INTERNATIONAL - 1119$254,031
RAHMAN SAFI INTERNATIONAL CONSULTING RSIASP$145,335
VIRGINIA TECH UNIVERSITY$134,196
SESAME WORKSHOP$111,647
IMAGINE WORLDWIDE$53,201
INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW ICNL FOR # 1081$22,457
VIAMO PBC$14,312
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 61% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RAHMAN SAFI INTERNATIONAL CONSULTING RSI: $562k → 10%WELLINGTON PAGE INTERNATIONAL - 1119: $254k → 10%INTERNEWS: $4.7M → 18%IREX: $4.0M → 14%SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC: $811k → 9%DPK INTERNATIONAL: $262k → 7%DAI GLOBAL LLC (DAI): $316k → 8%INTERNEWS: $4.0M → 18%IREX: $3.3M → 14%SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC: $539k → 9%MSI: $4.4M → 7%DAI GLOBAL LLC (DAI): $287k → 8%EQUAL ACCESS INT: $343k → 10%INTERNEWS: $1.4M → 18%IREX: $2.9M → 14%MSI: $3.5M → 7%DAI GLOBAL LLC (DAI): $223k → 8%EQUAL ACCESS INT: $327k → 10%SESAME WORKSHOP: $346k → 17%SSG-ADVISORS LLC: $252k → 14%MSI: $3.5M → 7%EQUAL ACCESS INT: $295k → 10%MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL: $1.9M → 7%EQUAL ACCESS INT: $241k → 10%MSI: $1.7M → 7%EQUAL ACCESS INTERNATIONAL: $177k → 10%PALLADIUM INT: $280k → 14%IFES: $239k → 7%PALLADIUM INT: $274k → 14%IFES: $224k → 7%CREATIVE ASSOCIATES: $472k → 14%CREATIVE ASSOCIATES: $461k → 14%CREATIVE ASSOCIATES: $439k → 14%CREATIVE ASSOCIATES: $270k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW: $852k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW: $829k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW: $514k → 14%DUE PROCESS OF LAW FOUNDATION: $488k → 14%DUE PROCESS OF LAW FOUNDATION: $458k → 14%VIAMO PBC: $231k → 14%DUE PROCESS OF LAW FOUNDATION: $229k → 14%VIAMO PBC: $219k → 14%AGA KHAN FOUNDATION: $1.1M → 14%AGA KHAN FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 14%AGA KHAN FOUNDATION: $696k → 14%NCBACLUSA: $426k → 14%NCBACLUSA: $403k → 14%NCBACLUSA: $199k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OR
OH
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $5.8M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, $5.7M to organizations and $53k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South Asia$3.1M · 54% · 80 grants · 6 people

Stated purpose: 8AM MEDIA_ASP AFGHANISTAN, 8AM MEDIA · ACSFO_ASP AFGHANISTAN, ACSFO · ACTION FOR DEVELOPMENT_ASP AFGHANISTAN, ACTION FOR DEVELOPMENT

Sub-Saharan Africa$893k · 16% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: CENTRO DE APRENDIZAGEM E CAPACITACAO DA SOCIEDADE CIVIL (CESC)_LEADING PARTNER IN ADVOCACY AND CAPACITY BUILDING ACTIVITIES, LEVERAGING ITS PROVEN CAPABILITIES IN ADVOCACY. · ASSOCIACAO PROGRESSO_LEADING PARTNER IN ADVOCACY AND CAPACITY BUILDING ACTIVITIES, LEVERAGING ITS PROVEN CAPABILITIES IN ADVOCACY. · ASSOCIATION HIMMA_BRING DECISION MAKERS AND CITIZENS TO PROMOTE COMMUNES' GOOD GOVERNANCE AND CITIZEN CONTROL OF PUBLIC ACTION FOR BETTER DELIVERY OF SERVICES, AND TO INCREASE THE LEVEL UNDERSTANDING OF CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND DUTIES IN LOCAL GOVERNANCE.

Middle East and North Africa$629k · 11% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: AL TADHAMUN_AL TADHAMUN · AL-NAJAH CENTER FORTRAINING & DEVELOPMENT_AL-NAJAH CENTER FORTRAINING & DEVELOPMENT · PAO-PUBLIC AID ORGANIZATION_PAO-PUBLIC AID ORGANIZATION

Central America and the Caribbean$514k · 9% · 14 grants

Stated purpose: FOUNDATION FOR STUDIES FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE LAW (FESPAD)_STRENGHTENING CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS FOR CITIZEN SECURITY DD-1078-2023-010 · IXCHEL WOMEN ASSOCIATION IN THE SOCIAL AND CULTURAL TRANSFORMATION_INCREASED VISIBILITY, MONITORING OF, AND ADVOCACY TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM OF MISSING PERSONS IN EL SALVADOR-DD-1078-2023-012 · ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNAL SALVADOREAN PROMOTORS (APROCSAL)_STRENGTHEN THE CAPACITIES OF THE COMMUNITY TO DEFEND AND PROMOTE HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE MUNICIPALITYOF JIQUILISCO, USULUTN DD-1078-2023-011

Russia and Neighboring States$510k · 9% · 15 grants

Stated purpose: ARMENIAN LAWYERS ASSOCIATION_ENHANCE THE FINANCIAL VIABILITY OF CSOS · ARMENIAN UNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION NGO_POLICY CHANGE ON YOUTH PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL DECISION-MAKING · BAYAZET ARMENIAN ANALYTICAL RESEARCH CENTER_TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT FOR COMMUNITY BASED BUDGETING

East Asia and the Pacific$101k · 2% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: ASSOCIAODEFICIENTESDE TIMOR-LESTE (ADTL)_STRENGTHENING ADVOCACY · COMMUNITY BASED REHABILITATION NETWORK TIMOR-LESTE (CBRNTL)_STRENGTHENING ADVOCACY · FUNDAO HAFOUN TIMOR LOROSAE (FHTL_STRENGTHENING ADVOCACY

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 37% of Counterpart International Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 29% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 1%.

Counterpart International Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 58% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$52M · 24 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
4

Total granted

$52M
$2.3M

Still filing today

58%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH & EXCHANGES BOARD INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $10M · revenue +86%
  • IN
    INTERNEWS NETWORK
    3× · 2017–2019 · $10M · revenue +109%
  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • MS
    MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2021 · $1.9M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $262k
  • AC
    ADAPT CONSULTING LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
2
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists Inc

International consortium of investigative journalists, inc.'s (icij) mission is to show people how the world really works through stories that rock the world; forcing positive change.

International
3
International Budget Partnership

Ibp works with civil society, governments, international institutions and the private sector to bring about a world in which empowered citizens participate in open, inclusive public budgeting processes to shape policies and practices that…

International
4
International Bridges to Justice

In recognition of the fundamental principles of the universal declaration of human rights, international bridges to justice (ibj) is dedicated to protecting the basic legal rights of ordinary citizens in developing countries. specifically,…

Crime & Legal
5
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
6
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
7
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
8
International Law Institute

Ili's mission is fostering prosperity through the rule of law. ili believes that economic growth and effective governance is achieved through a sound legal infrastructure. ili's mission is to raise the levels of professional competence and…

International
9
Institute for State Effectiveness

The institute for state effectiveness seeks to close the governance gap and advance inclusive growth so that states and markets deliver to citizens. ise advances practical approaches to strengthen capacity for transformation, through…

International
10
American Society of International Law

To foster the study of international law and to promote international relations on the basis of law and justice.

International
11
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
12
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Foundation for Electoral Systems; the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MSI: $13,073,340 · OtherMSIMANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL: $1,920,501 · OtherMANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONALCREATIVE ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL: $1,727,572 · OtherCREATIVE ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONALCOOPERATIVE LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $1,026,860 · OtherDAI DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE: $1,013,496 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $806,632 · Other+9 more: $3,486,281 · Other+9 moreINTERNATIONAL RESEARCH & EXCHANGES BOARD INC: $10,274,663 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL RESEARCH & EXCHANGES BOA…AGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA: $2,857,261 · InternationalAGA KHAN FOUNDATION USAINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW INC: $2,665,720 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFI…Save The Children Federation Inc: $1,444,596 · InternationalSave The Children Federation IncWORLD VISION INC: $753,408 · International+2 more: $530,017 · InternationalINTERNEWS NETWORK: $10,123,813 · Arts & CultureINTERNEWS NETWORKTHE DUE PROCESS OF LAW FOUNDATION: $1,174,472 · Arts & CultureTHE DUE PROCESS OF LAW F…SESAME WORKSHOP: $608,122 · Arts & CultureEqual Access International: $1,384,173 · HealthIMAGINE WORLDWIDE: $232,802 · Community ImprovementUniversity of Miami: $25,000 · EducationHIRAM COLLEGE: $23,595 · Education
Other$23,054,682International$18,525,665Arts & Culture$11,906,407Health$1,384,173Community Improvement$232,802Education$48,595

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL RESEARCH & EXCHANGES BOARD INC: $10,274,663 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetINTERNEWS NETWORK: $10,123,813 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetAGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA: $2,857,261 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW INC: $2,665,720 over 9y, 8.3% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,444,596 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEqual Access International: $1,384,173 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetTHE DUE PROCESS OF LAW FOUNDATION: $1,174,472 over 3y, 26% of budgetCOOPERATIVE LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $1,026,860 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $753,408 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSESAME WORKSHOP: $608,122 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR ELECTORAL SYSTEMS: $449,834 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetIMAGINE WORLDWIDE: $232,802 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SENIOR LAWYERS'CORPORATION: $80,183 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIRAM COLLEGE: $23,595 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH & EXCHANGES BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNEWS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds AGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Equal Access International ↗
  • Who funds THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds SESAME WORKSHOP ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR ELECTORAL SYSTEMS ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINE WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SENIOR LAWYERS'CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds HIRAM COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Family Health International IncNC21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Family Health International Inc · Pact Inc · National Endowment for Democracy · Foundation to Promote Open Society · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Ford Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Counterpart International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Counterpart International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Counterpart International’s filings →

More from the funding graph