Skip to content
Coshocton Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Coshocton Foundation

Community foundation

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
50
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$537k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$6.3MCommunity Improvement$3.5MEducation$2.6MRecreation & Sports$1.0MArts & Culture$615kReligion$587kPhilanthropy$513kHuman Services$259kOther$0
02FY2025 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 50 grants below total $1,636,529, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,797,780 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $161,251 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $102k
  • $10k–50k29 grants · $619k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $378k
  • $250k+1 grant · $537k
$15,080
Median grant
6
States reached
$50M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROSCOE VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC$537,000
OUR TOWN COSHOCTON$115,571
KIDS AMERICA INC$94,220
COSHOCTON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS$61,145
TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH$57,500
COSHOCTON CHEROKEES BASEBALL CLUB INC$50,000
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$47,750
US SPACE & ROCKET CENTER FOUNDATION$44,549
COSH CO EMS$42,122
CENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE$34,150
KNO-HO-CO ASHLAND CAC$31,192
RIVER VIEW LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$29,200
PREGNANCY CENTER OF COSHOCTON INC$25,017
COSH CO DISTRICT LIBRARY$24,666
COSH CITY & COUNTY PARK DISTRICT$24,425
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%US SPACE & ROCKET CENTER FOUNDATION: $45k → 11%US SPACE & ROCKET CENTER FOUNDATION: $42k → 11%HOSPICE OF TUSCARAWAS COUNTY INC: $28k → 12%US SPACE & ROCKET CENTER FOUNDATION: $36k → 11%HOSPICE CARE OF TUSCARAWAS: $22k → 12%US SPACE AND ROCKET CENTER: $21k → 11%HOSPICE OF TUSCARAWAS COUNTY INC: $20k → 12%HOSPICE CARE OF TUSCARAWAS: $7k → 12%FOUNDATION FOR THE FUSE NETWORK - HOPEWELL: $17k → 10%ECHOING HILLS VILLAGE INC: $21k → 15%ECHOING HILLS VILLAGE: $19k → 15%GENTLEBROOK INC: $4.0M → 13%GENTLEBROOK INC: $10k → 13%GENTLEBROOK: $10k → 13%ECHOING HILLS VILLAGE INC: $11k → 15%ECHOING HILLS VILLAGE INC: $10k → 15%ECHOING HILLS VILLAGE INC: $7k → 15%KNO-HO-CO ASHLAND CAC: $42k → 15%KNO-HO-CO ASHLAND CAC: $31k → 15%KNO-HO-CO ASHLAND CAC: $25k → 15%KNO HO CO: $22k → 15%KNO HO CO: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
IL
MI
IA
OH
PA
KY
WV
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 70 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

70 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

70
37

Total granted

$14M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

47%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GI
    GENTLEBROOK INC
    3× · 2018–2023 · $4.0M · revenue +67%
  • RV
    ROSCOE VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $704k · revenue +202%
  • KA
    KIDS AMERICA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $454k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • GH
    GENESIS HEALTHCARE SYSTEMgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2.0M · revenue +29%
  • KP
    KEENE PTO
    one grant, 2023 · $45k
  • CC
    COSHOCTON COUNTY CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU
    one grant, 2020 · $27k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
2
Houghton University

Houghton university provides an academically challenging, christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences to students from diverse traditions and economic backgrounds and equips them to lead and labor as scholar-servants in a…

Education
3
The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science & Art

See schedule ovision: the cooper union for the advancement of science and art is dedicated to peter cooper's radical commitment to diversity and his founding vision that fair access to an inspiring free education and forums for courageous…

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
University of Rio Grande

The university of rio grande/ rio grande community college is america's unique private/public institution of higher education designed to provide learners the opportunity to attain a high-quality, high-value education. our personalized,…

Education
8
Colgate University

Colgate university's mission is to provide a demanding, expansive educational experience to a select group of diverse, talented, intellectually sophisticated students who are capable of challenging themselves, their peers and their…

Education
9
Ohio Christian University

Ohio christian university (ocu) is committed to offering a complete education that develops students intellectually, professionally, and spiritually. (continued on schedule o)ocu offers degree programs designed to equip students to become…

Education
10
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
11
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
12
Clarkson University

Clarkson university is an independent, nationally recognized technological university whose faculty of teacher-scholars aspires to offer superior instruction and engage in high-quality research and scholarship in engineering, business,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Echoing Hills Village Inc; the most unlike its peers is Clary Garden Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/64
Grantees still filing
39/64
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COSHOCTON PORT AUTHORITY: $910,200 · OtherCOSHOCTON PORT AUTHORITYDELAWARE-MORROW MENTAL HEALTH & REC: $631,711 · OtherDELAWARE-MORROW MENTAL HEALTH & RECCENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $483,333 · OtherCENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGECOSHOCTON CHEROKEES BASEBALL CLUB INC: $340,375 · OtherTRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $245,000 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $231,883 · OtherCOSHOCTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $225,833 · OtherCLARY GARDEN FOUNDATION: $378,950 · OtherCLARY GARDEN FOUNDATION+72 more: $3,012,992 · Other+72 moreGENTLEBROOK INC: $4,019,974 · Human ServicesGENTLEBROOK INC+5 more: $430,889 · Human Services+5 moreGENESIS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM: $2,000,000 · HealthGENESIS HEALTH…+4 more: $95,153 · HealthROSCOE VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC: $704,121 · Arts & CulturePOMERENE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $202,051 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC: $194,190 · Arts & CultureFOOTLIGHT PLAYERS: $140,059 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $5,500 · Arts & CultureTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $295,309 · EducationMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $113,750 · EducationOtterbein University: $65,833 · EducationThe University of Findlay: $64,333 · EducationMount Vernon Nazarene University: $52,500 · EducationMarietta College: $46,200 · EducationCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $28,000 · Education+13 more: $120,134 · EducationOUR TOWN COSHOCTON: $736,436 · Community ImprovementCOSHOCTON FOUNDATION: $29,024 · Community ImprovementKIDS AMERICA INC: $453,932 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF THE PARKS: $96,703 · Recreation & SportsRIVER VIEW ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $38,171 · Recreation & Sports
Other$6,460,277Human Services$4,450,863Health$2,095,153Arts & Culture$1,245,921Education$786,059Community Improvement$765,460Recreation & Sports$588,806

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGENTLEBROOK INC: $4,019,974 over 3y, 20% of budgetGENESIS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM: $2,000,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOUR TOWN COSHOCTON: $736,436 over 7y, 39% of budgetROSCOE VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC: $704,121 over 5y, 18% of budgetKIDS AMERICA INC: $453,932 over 9y, 9.9% of budgetCLARY GARDEN FOUNDATION: $378,950 over 5y, 15% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $295,309 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOMERENE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $202,051 over 8y, 76% of budgetNATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC: $194,190 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetUS SPACE & ROCKET CENTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $143,083 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFOOTLIGHT PLAYERS: $140,059 over 5y, 26% of budgetKNO-HO-CO-ASHLAND COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION: $125,962 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $113,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF COSHOCTON COUNTY INC: $112,477 over 7y, 7.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PARKS: $96,703 over 7y, 47% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA MUSKINGUM VALLEY COUNCIL INC: $95,107 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetHOSPICE OF TUSCARAWAS COUNTY INC: $77,770 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOSHOCTON COUNTY AGRI SOCIETY: $73,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetECHOING HILLS VILLAGE INC: $67,554 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST STEP FAMILY VIOLENCE INTSERV: $67,088 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetOtterbein University: $65,833 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Findlay: $64,333 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMount Vernon Nazarene University: $52,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMarietta College: $46,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOSHOCTON COUNTY DRUG & ALCOHOL COUNCIL INC: $45,316 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetRIVER VIEW ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $38,171 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $30,938 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOSHOCTON FOUNDATION: $29,024 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $28,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPregnancy Center of Coshocton Inc: $25,017 over 1y, 13% of budgetASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $23,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $21,968 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Central Ohio Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOSHOCTON COMMUNITY CHOIR INC: $19,500 over 1y, 28% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO: $15,980 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUniversity of Mount Union: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF APPALACHIAN OHIO: $13,720 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMuskingum Valley Health Center: $12,853 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOSHOCTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $12,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $11,967 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDES MOINES UNIVERSITY OSTEOPATHIC MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $9,334 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWalsh University Inc: $8,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEWELL INDUSTRIES INC: $8,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRIVER VIEW MUSIC BOOSTERSINC: $7,500 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetWright State University Foundation Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE STAR MOMS OF COSHOCTON OH: $7,200 over 1y, 6.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GENTLEBROOK INC ↗
  • Who funds GENESIS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds OUR TOWN COSHOCTON ↗
  • Who funds ROSCOE VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CLARY GARDEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER ↗
  • Who funds POMERENE CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC ↗
  • Who funds US SPACE & ROCKET CENTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOTLIGHT PLAYERS ↗
  • Who funds COSHOCTON IS BLOOMING ↗
  • Who funds KNO-HO-CO-ASHLAND COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF COSHOCTON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PARKS ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA MUSKINGUM VALLEY COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF TUSCARAWAS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds COSHOCTON COUNTY AGRI SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ECHOING HILLS VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST STEP FAMILY VIOLENCE INTSERV ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Montgomery FoundationPark National Corpora…Schooler Family Found…Columbus FoundationThe Ohio Foundation o…Peoples Bank Foundati…Community Foundations…Ruth M Hughes Scholar…Stark Community Found…National Collegiate A…Clapper Scholarship F…Ella Weiss Educationa…
Montgomery FoundationOH49.5× affinity21 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Montgomery Foundation · Park National Corporation Foundation · Schooler Family Foundation · Columbus Foundation · The Ohio Foundation of Independent Colleges · Peoples Bank Foundation · Community Foundations Inc · Ruth M Hughes Scholarship Trust · Stark Community Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Clapper Scholarship Fund · Ella Weiss Educational Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coshocton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coshocton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 121 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Coshocton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home