· Public charity
Coshocton Foundation
Community foundation
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 50 grants below total $1,636,529 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,797,780 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $161,251 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $102k
- $10k–50k29 grants · $619k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $378k
- $250k+1 grant · $537k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROSCOE VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC | $537,000 |
| OUR TOWN COSHOCTON | $115,571 |
| KIDS AMERICA INC | $94,220 |
| COSHOCTON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS | $61,145 |
| TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $57,500 |
| COSHOCTON CHEROKEES BASEBALL CLUB INC | $50,000 |
| THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY | $47,750 |
| US SPACE & ROCKET CENTER FOUNDATION | $44,549 |
| COSH CO EMS | $42,122 |
| CENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE | $34,150 |
| KNO-HO-CO ASHLAND CAC | $31,192 |
| RIVER VIEW LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT | $29,200 |
| PREGNANCY CENTER OF COSHOCTON INC | $25,017 |
| COSH CO DISTRICT LIBRARY | $24,666 |
| COSH CITY & COUNTY PARK DISTRICT | $24,425 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
70 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GIGENTLEBROOK INC3× · 2018–2023 · $4.0M · revenue +67%
- RVROSCOE VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2025 · $704k · revenue +55%
- KAKIDS AMERICA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $454k · revenue +75%
Funded once
- GHGENESIS HEALTHCARE SYSTEMgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $2.0M · revenue +29%
- KPKEENE PTOone grant, 2023 · $45k
- CCCOSHOCTON COUNTY CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAUone grant, 2020 · $27k · revenue -28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…
Houghton university provides an academically challenging, christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences to students from diverse traditions and economic backgrounds and equips them to lead and labor as scholar-servants in a…
See schedule ovision: the cooper union for the advancement of science and art is dedicated to peter cooper's radical commitment to diversity and his founding vision that fair access to an inspiring free education and forums for courageous…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The university of rio grande/ rio grande community college is america's unique private/public institution of higher education designed to provide learners the opportunity to attain a high-quality, high-value education. our personalized,…
Colgate university's mission is to provide a demanding, expansive educational experience to a select group of diverse, talented, intellectually sophisticated students who are capable of challenging themselves, their peers and their…
Ohio christian university (ocu) is committed to offering a complete education that develops students intellectually, professionally, and spiritually. (continued on schedule o)ocu offers degree programs designed to equip students to become…
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Clarkson university is an independent, nationally recognized technological university whose faculty of teacher-scholars aspires to offer superior instruction and engage in high-quality research and scholarship in engineering, business,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Echoing Hills Village Inc and the most unlike its peers is Clary Garden Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 37. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 14% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GENTLEBROOK INC ↗
- Who funds GENESIS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds OUR TOWN COSHOCTON ↗
- Who funds ROSCOE VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds CLARY GARDEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER ↗
- Who funds POMERENE CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC ↗
- Who funds US SPACE & ROCKET CENTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOOTLIGHT PLAYERS ↗
- Who funds COSHOCTON IS BLOOMING ↗
- Who funds KNO-HO-CO-ASHLAND COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION ↗
- Who funds MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF COSHOCTON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PARKS ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA MUSKINGUM VALLEY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF TUSCARAWAS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds COSHOCTON COUNTY AGRI SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ECHOING HILLS VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST STEP FAMILY VIOLENCE INTSERV ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Montgomery Foundation · Park National Corporation Foundation · Schooler Family Foundation · Columbus Foundation · The Ohio Foundation of Independent Colleges · Peoples Bank Foundation · Community Foundations Inc · Ruth M Hughes Scholarship Trust · Stark Community Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Clapper Scholarship Fund · Ella Weiss Educational Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Coshocton Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.