Skip to content

· Private foundation

Corwin Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$123k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$135kPhilanthropy$43kRecreation & Sports$41kEducation$41kCommunity Improvement$28kArts & Culture$24kPublic Benefit$20kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $101k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 99% of reported assets are held in Cnb.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE EMANUEL OF BEVERLY HILLS$24,310
WOODEN ATHLETIC FUND$15,000
WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$12,000
CONGREGATION B'NAI BRITH$10,000
COROLA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR$10,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL OF HOLLYWOOD$6,600
LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC$5,500
BIG SUNDAY$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
JEWISH WOMEN'S ARCHIVE$1,000
HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA$1,000
MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 10%VOW FOR GIRLS: $200 → 17%CORE: $1k → 14%CONNECTIONS FOR CHILDREN: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$341k · 20 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +89% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
46

Total granted

$341k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+22%

Still filing today

40%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +81%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $19k · revenue +55%
  • WU
    WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2021–2024 · $19k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • DC
    DISCOVERY CUBE LOAS ANGELES
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • VB
    VARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUBgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
2
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
3
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
4
Los Angeles County Bar Association (Lacba)

Meeting the professional needs of los angeles lawyers, and improving the administration of justice.

—
5
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
6
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
7
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

—
8
Los Angeles County Medical Association

To enhance the professionalism and clinical autonomy of physicians to allow them to advocate for their patients and the health of the community of los angeles.

—
9
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
10
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
11
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
12
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Martin Luther King Jr Community Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Core. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
28/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE EMANUEL OF BEVERLY HILLS: $94,945 · OtherTEMPLE EMANUEL OF BEVERLY HILLSWOODEN ATHLETIC FUND: $40,600 · OtherWOODEN ATHLETIC FUNDTEMPLE ISRAEL OF HOLLYWOOD: $25,772 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL OF HOLLYWOODIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEWISH FEDERATION OF SANTA BARBARA: $20,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF SANTA BARBARAIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOROLA: $20,000 · OtherCOROLADISCOVERY CUBE LOAS ANGELES: $20,000 · OtherDISCOVERY CUBE LOAS ANGELES+47 more: $90,843 · Other+47 moreWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $18,500 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Education+4 more: $1,400 · EducationLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $18,500 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH WOMEN'S ARCHIVE INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $1,000 · Arts & CultureCORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $20,000 · Public BenefitBig Sunday: $7,500 · Community ImprovementCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $2,500 · HealthDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $1,000 · HealthCouncil on Alcoholism & Drug Abuse: $1,000 · HealthTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthMARTIN LUTHER KING JR COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $250 · HealthFriends of the Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism: $1,800 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,050 · InternationalCureCervicalCancer: $100 · International
Other$352,160Education$34,900Arts & Culture$21,500Public Benefit$20,000Community Improvement$7,500Health$5,250International$2,950

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $18,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $18,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBig Sunday: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH WOMEN'S ARCHIVE INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of the Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Barbara Hillel: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCouncil on Alcoholism & Drug Abuse: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARLBOROUGH SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLYWOOD FOOD COALITION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA RETIREMENT MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTIONS FOR CHILDREN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYBODY DANCE LA: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE SCHOOL FOR AUTISM INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTIN LUTHER KING JR COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOW FOR GIRLS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEAL THE BAY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCureCervicalCancer: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Big Sunday ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds VARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH WOMEN'S ARCHIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Santa Barbara Hillel ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA ↗
  • Who funds CORE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA23.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · American Gift Fund · Hausner Family Foundation · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · The Rose Hills Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Ahmanson Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Corwin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Corwin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Corwin Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Corwin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Corwin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph