Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cora and John H Davis Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$714k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$1.2MFood & Nutrition$480kYouth Development$265kCommunity Improvement$265kHuman Services$205kArts & Culture$190kReligion$165kEmployment$110kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $506k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER FOUNDATION$100,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER WASHINGTON$50,000
SHARE OUR STRENGTH$50,000
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY$40,000
SHADY GROVE MEDICAL CENTER$31,000
CAPITAL JEWISH MUSEUM$30,000
JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY(JSSA)$30,000
CITY OF HOPE$30,000
MARTHA'S TABLE$25,000
SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT(SOME)$25,000
US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$25,000
HIGHER ACHIEVEMENT$25,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$25,000
DC CENTRAL KITCHEN$25,000
BREM FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY(JSSA): $30k → 8%PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY: $10k → 14%PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY: $10k → 14%PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 31 repeat orgs$261k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
7

Total granted

$3.4M
$195k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+9%

Still filing today

55%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $305k · revenue +74%
  • TD
    THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $135k · revenue +52%
  • MT
    MARTHA'S TABLE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $135k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • MD
    MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • SH
    SUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -34%
  • BI
    B'NAI ISRAEL CONGREGATION (GLAZER YOUTH ENDOWMENT)
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Lucy Webb Hayes National Training School for Deaconesses & Missionaries

Sibley memorial hospital in washington, d.c., a member of johns hopkins medicine, has a distinguished history of serving the community since its founding in 1890. as a not-for-profit, full-service community hospital, sibley offers…

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
7
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
10
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
11
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
12
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sibley Memorial Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is National Vulvodynia Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
10/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $470,000 · OtherWASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER FOUNDATIONBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE: $305,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATECITY OF HOPE: $295,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPESHARE OUR STRENGTH: $280,000 · OtherSHARE OUR STRENGTHTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $135,000 · OtherJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES: $135,000 · OtherSUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION(SUPPORTS CARDIOVASCULAR): $125,000 · OtherMAGEN DAVID ADOM: $100,000 · OtherSOME INC: $100,000 · OtherNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $100,000 · Other+14 more: $579,000 · Other+14 moreBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $160,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UN…HOLY CROSS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · HealthHOLY CROSS HEAL…MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $85,000 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTRO…HOPE CONNECTIONS FOR CANCER SUPPORT INC: $60,000 · HealthHOPE CONNECTION…FOOD & FRIENDS INC: $55,000 · HealthFOOD & FRIENDS …SUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · HealthSIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthLillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum: $125,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $105,000 · Arts & CultureROUND HOUSE THEATRE INC: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $135,000 · Food & NutritionBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $55,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $65,000 · EducationA WIDER CIRCLE INC: $10,000 · EducationTHE PARENT PROJECT FOR MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY RESEARCH INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $30,000 · Human Services
Other$2,624,000Health$500,000Arts & Culture$250,000Food & Nutrition$190,000Education$75,000Human Services$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE: $305,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $280,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $160,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $135,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $135,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum: $125,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $105,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOLY CROSS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetSOME INC: $100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $85,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE CONNECTIONS FOR CANCER SUPPORT INC: $60,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PARENT PROJECT FOR MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY RESEARCH INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNational Vulvodynia Association Inc: $18,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetROUND HOUSE THEATRE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetA WIDER CIRCLE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIRIS MUSIC PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Lillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds HOLY CROSS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CONNECTIONS FOR CANCER SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD & FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PARENT PROJECT FOR MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds SUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds National Vulvodynia Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROUND HOUSE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds A WIDER CIRCLE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN11.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cora and John H Davis Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cora and John H Davis Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • A Wider Circle Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Round House Theatre Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cora and John H Davis Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Cora and John H Davis Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cora and John H Davis’ filings →

More from the funding graph