· Public charity
Contra Costa Jewish Community Center
The CCJCC serves as a welcoming entry door into greater Jewish involvement.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 80% of Contra Costa Jewish Community Center Inc’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k20 grants · $99k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $64k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| West Coast NCSY | $39,220 |
| Jewish Community Federation Endwmt Fund | $25,000 |
| Chabad of Contra Costa | $7,000 |
| Congregation B'Nai Tikvah | $7,000 |
| Contra Costa Jewish Day School | $7,000 |
| Contra Costa Midrasha | $7,000 |
| J The Jewish Weekly of Northern CA | $7,000 |
| Jewish LearningWorks | $7,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,500 |
| Jewish Concord | $6,000 |
| Chabad of Danville & San Ramon | $5,500 |
| Shalom Bayit | $5,500 |
| Congregation Beth Emek | $4,500 |
| Shevet Egoz | $4,000 |
| Temple Isaiah of Contra Costa Co | $3,900 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
26 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCONTRA COSTA MIDRASHA4× · 2019–2024 · $51k · revenue +4%
- CCCONTRA COSTA JEWISH DAY SCHOOL4× · 2019–2024 · $41k · revenue +63%
- TRTHE REUTLINGER COMMUNITY3× · 2021–2024 · $28k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- EBEAST BAY JEWISH FILM FESTIVALone grant, 2020 · $10k
- HIHAMAQOM I THE PLACE2× · 2021–2022 · $9k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The CCJCC serves as a welcoming entry door into greater Jewish involvement. We are inclusive and engage both the unaffiliated as well as the affiliated members of our community. We embrace diversity and actively support creative approaches…
The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.
JCHS is a college preparatory high school committed to integrating deep learning, wisdom, and Jewish values. We empower students to embrace their Jewish identity, generate empathy and compassion, delight in lifelong education, and improve…
The contemporary jewish museum (the cjm) makes the diversity of the jewish experience relevant for a twenty-first-century audience through innovative exhibitions and programs that educate, challenge, and inspire.
To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…
Our vision is to develop ethical, impactful Jewish young adult leaders to ensure a vibrant Jewish community and make the world a better place. Our mission is to empower and engage Jewish young adults through leadership development and…
To build and strengthen the Jewish community, to provide cultural, educational, social and recreational opportunities for a deeper commitment to, and greater participation in Jewish life in Sonoma County.
The mission of Iowa Hillel is to enhance the lives of Jewish students at the University of Iowa, so they may enrich the Jewish people and the world. Iowa Hillel envisions a world for our students where they find a community here at Iowa…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Moishe House and the most unlike its peers is East Bay Holocaust Education Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONTRA COSTA MIDRASHA ↗
- Who funds CONTRA COSTA JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE REUTLINGER COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds Wilderness Torah ↗
- Who funds Urban Adamah ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT JEWISH WORLD CINEMA INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH LEARNINGWORKS ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY HOLOCAUST EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MOISHE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds LIMMUD BAY AREA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Jewish Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of the Greater East Bay · Rodan Family Foundation · The Donald and Carole Chaiken Foundation · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Koret Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Contra Costa Jewish Community Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.