Skip to content
Contra Costa Jewish Community Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Contra Costa Jewish Community Center

The CCJCC serves as a welcoming entry door into greater Jewish involvement.

$163k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$39k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$433kHuman Services$112kYouth Development$51kEducation$50kArts & Culture$46kHealth$28kPhilanthropy$25kEnvironment$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $99k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $64k
$5,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
West Coast NCSY$39,220
Jewish Community Federation Endwmt Fund$25,000
Chabad of Contra Costa$7,000
Contra Costa Midrasha$7,000
Congregation B'Nai Tikvah$7,000
Contra Costa Jewish Day School$7,000
J The Jewish Weekly of Northern CA$7,000
Jewish LearningWorks$7,000
Individual grant recipient$6,500
Jewish Concord$6,000
Chabad of Danville & San Ramon$5,500
Shalom Bayit$5,500
Congregation Beth Emek$4,500
Shevet Egoz$4,000
Temple Isaiah of Contra Costa Co$3,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Jewish Community Federation Endwmt Fund: $25k → 9%URBAN ADAMAH: $16k → 10%J THE JEWISH WEEKLY OF NORTHERN: $21k → 10%MOISHE HOUSE: $8k → 11%West Coast NCSY: $39k → 14%CONTRA COSTA JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $21k → 9%J THE JEWISH WEEKLY OF NORTHERN: $8k → 10%WEST COAST NCSY: $21k → 14%TEMPLE ISAIAH OF CONTRA COSTA CO: $21k → 9%NCSY NORCAL: $8k → 10%Jewish LearningWorks: $7k → 10%WEST COAST NCSY: $20k → 14%CONTRA COSTA JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $8k → 9%HAMAQOM I THE PLACE: $19k → 10%Contra Costa Jewish Day School: $7k → 9%WILDERNESS TORAH: $16k → 10%J The Jewish Weekly of Northern CA: $7k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SVC: $16k → 10%Jewish Concord: $6k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SVC: $7k → 10%EAST BAY HOLOCAUST EDUCATION CENTER: $8k → 10%CONGREGATION B'NAI TIKVAH: $21k → 9%CONGREGATION BETH EMEK: $21k → 10%CONTRA COSTA MIDRASHA: $15k → 9%SHALOM BAYIT: $21k → 10%CONGREGATION B'NAI TIKVAH: $8k → 9%SHALOM BAYIT: $8k → 10%Congregation B'Nai Tikvah: $7k → 9%CHABAD OF CONTRA COSTA: $21k → 9%CHABAD OF CONTRA COSTA: $8k → 9%Chabad of Contra Costa: $7k → 9%CHABAD OF CONCORD: $8k → 9%BETH CHAIM CONGREGATION: $21k → 9%THE REUTLINGER COMMUNITY: $21k → 9%BETH CHAIM CONGREGATION: $7k → 9%Beth Chaim Congregation: $7k → 9%CONGREGATION B'NAI SHALOM: $21k → 9%CONTRA COSTA MIDRASHA: $21k → 9%CHABAD OF THE TRI VALLEY: $21k → 9%B'NAI SHALOM: $12k → 9%CONGREGATION B'NAI SHALOM: $11k → 9%INDEPENDENT JEWISH WORLD CINEMA: $10k → 9%EAST BAY JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL: $10k → 9%CONTRA COSTA MIDRASHA: $8k → 9%IJWC: $8k → 9%Contra Costa Midrasha: $7k → 9%CHABAD OF THE DELTA: $16k → 9%CHABAD OF DANVILLE & SAN RAMON: $21k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$728k · 26 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
8

Total granted

$728k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+33%

Still filing today

31%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’24
ReligionEducationEnvironmentHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CONTRA COSTA MIDRASHA
    4× · 2019–2024 · $51k · revenue +4%
  • CC
    CONTRA COSTA JEWISH DAY SCHOOL
    4× · 2019–2024 · $41k · revenue +63%
  • TR
    THE REUTLINGER COMMUNITY
    3× · 2021–2024 · $28k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • EB
    EAST BAY JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • HI
    HAMAQOM I THE PLACE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Contra Costa Jewish Community Center Inc

The CCJCC serves as a welcoming entry door into greater Jewish involvement. We are inclusive and engage both the unaffiliated as well as the affiliated members of our community. We embrace diversity and actively support creative approaches…

Human Services
2
Youth Towns of Israel (California)
International
3
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
Jewish Commmunity High School of the Bay

JCHS is a college preparatory high school committed to integrating deep learning, wisdom, and Jewish values. We empower students to embrace their Jewish identity, generate empathy and compassion, delight in lifelong education, and improve…

Education
6
The Contemporary Jewish Museum

The contemporary jewish museum (the cjm) makes the diversity of the jewish experience relevant for a twenty-first-century audience through innovative exhibitions and programs that educate, challenge, and inspire.

Arts & Culture
7
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
8
Jewish Mothers of Metropolitan Seattle
Religion
9
J Leaders

Our vision is to develop ethical, impactful Jewish young adult leaders to ensure a vibrant Jewish community and make the world a better place. Our mission is to empower and engage Jewish young adults through leadership development and…

Youth Development
10
Jewish Community Center of Sonoma County

To build and strengthen the Jewish community, to provide cultural, educational, social and recreational opportunities for a deeper commitment to, and greater participation in Jewish life in Sonoma County.

Arts & Culture
11
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
12
The University of Iowa Louis Shulman Hillel Foundation

The mission of Iowa Hillel is to enhance the lives of Jewish students at the University of Iowa, so they may enrich the Jewish people and the world. Iowa Hillel envisions a world for our students where they find a community here at Iowa…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Moishe House; the most unlike its peers is East Bay Holocaust Education Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNION OF ORTHODOX JEWISH CONGREGATIONS OF AMERICA: $85,220 · OtherUNION OF ORTHODOX JEWISH CONGREGATIONS OF AMERICACONTRA COSTA MIDRASHA: $51,000 · OtherCONTRA COSTA MIDRASHACONGREGATION BNAI SHOLOM OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $44,220 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI SHOLOM OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTYCHABAD OF CONTRA COSTA INC: $40,500 · OtherCHABAD OF CONTRA COSTA INCCONGREGATION B NAI TIKVAH: $36,000 · OtherCONGREGATION B NAI TIKVAHIndividual grant recipient: $34,500 · OtherSHALOM BAYIT: $34,500 · OtherCHABAD OF DANVILLE & SAN RAMON: $31,500 · OtherCHABAD OF THE TRI VALLEY: $31,000 · OtherLIVERMORE VALLEY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $30,500 · OtherTEMPLE ISAIAH OF CONTRA COSTA CO: $29,900 · OtherJ THE JEWISH WEEKLY OF NORTHERN: $29,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SVC: $26,500 · OtherJewish Community Federation Endwmt Fund: $25,000 · OtherCHABAD OF THE DELTA: $24,000 · Other+14 more: $101,096 · Other+14 moreCONTRA COSTA JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $41,000 · EducationEAST BAY HOLOCAUST EDUCATION CENTER INC: $11,500 · EducationWilderness Torah: $21,000 · EnvironmentUrban Adamah: $20,000 · EnvironmentJEWISH LEARNINGWORKS: $16,000 · ReligionMOISHE HOUSE: $7,500 · ReligionLIMMUD BAY AREA: $5,000 · ReligionTHE REUTLINGER COMMUNITY: $28,000 · HealthINDEPENDENT JEWISH WORLD CINEMA INC: $17,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$654,436Education$52,500Environment$41,000Religion$28,500Health$28,000Arts & Culture$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONTRA COSTA MIDRASHA: $51,000 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetCONTRA COSTA JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $41,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE REUTLINGER COMMUNITY: $28,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWilderness Torah: $21,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetUrban Adamah: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH LEARNINGWORKS: $16,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEAST BAY HOLOCAUST EDUCATION CENTER INC: $11,500 over 2y, 12% of budgetMOISHE HOUSE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIMMUD BAY AREA: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONTRA COSTA MIDRASHA ↗
  • Who funds CONTRA COSTA JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE REUTLINGER COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds Wilderness Torah ↗
  • Who funds Urban Adamah ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT JEWISH WORLD CINEMA INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH LEARNINGWORKS ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY HOLOCAUST EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MOISHE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds LIMMUD BAY AREA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Fede…The Jewish Community …Jewish Community Fede…Rodan Family Foundati…The Donald and Carole…The Shimon Ben Joseph…Koret FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…Paypal Charitable Giv…Donor Advised Charita…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…
Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA34.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Jewish Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of the Greater East Bay · Rodan Family Foundation · The Donald and Carole Chaiken Foundation · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Koret Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Contra Costa Jewish Community Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Contra Costa Jewish Community Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $1k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Contra Costa Jewish Community Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home