Skip to content

North Carolina · Private foundation

Constructive Management Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2021
11
Grants FY2021
11
Organizations funded FY2021
27%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of Constructive Management Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Donors Trust Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Constructive Management Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $8k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

12
’17
5
’18
14
’19
12
’20
8
’21
5
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2021
$500
Largest grant, FY2021
$2,500
Organizations funded a year
9 to 21
FY2017 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
8
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 27% of the organizations Constructive Management Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 39% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
EducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalSocial SciencePublic BenefitFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202111$8k27%
FY202021$18k57%
FY201918$8k50%
FY20189$19k56%
FY201718$36kn/a
96% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$445kEducation$33kCivil Rights$12kReligion$10kArts & Culture$7kSocial Science$5kYouth Development$4kPublic Benefit$3kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
KY
VA
AZ
NM
NC
DC
GA
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 34 grantees

Plus 20 recipients with no EIN on record ($30k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Constructive Management Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCarolina Day School Inc: $17,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetState Policy Network: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Community Center of Asheville Inc: $5,560 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOpen Doors of Asheville Inc: $4,640 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetThe Buckeye Institute: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUpper Midwest Law Center: $1,850 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAsheville Humane Society Inc: $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAsheville Art Museum Association Inc: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPreservation Society of Asheville & Buncombe County Inc: $1,434 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPreserving a Picturesque America Inc: $1,284 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetPenland School Of Craft: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe John Locke Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Economic Education Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCato Institute: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSamaritan's Purse: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLitigators for Liberty Network: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLucy Burns Institute Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBuckley Institute Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetManna Food Bank Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Humane Society: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeaf Global Arts: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Reason Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlue Ridge Parkway Foundation: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Global Inc: $180 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the WNC Nature Center Inc: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc: $115 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDavid Horowitz Freedom Center: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetExploring Joara Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAsheville Community Theatre Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChrist School Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWikimedia Foundation Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 32.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina IncNC25.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Dogwood Health Trust · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Donors Trust Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Frances & William H Beattie Fdn · Richard Eckerd Foundation Inc · The Goodman Foundation Inc · Sarah Scaife Foundation Incorporated · Charles Koch Institute · John William Pope Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Constructive Management Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Constructive Management Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Constructive Management Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Constructive Management Foundation

How much does Constructive Management Foundation give?
Constructive Management Foundation reported 11 grants totaling $8,080 in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 21 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2021.
What does Constructive Management Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2022, its largest causes are Philanthropy (84%), Education (6%), Civil Rights (2%).
Who are Constructive Management Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2022: Carolina Day School Inc ($18k), State Policy Network ($11k), Rainbow Community School ($6k).
Does Constructive Management Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 27% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Constructive Management Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Constructive Management Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc, Dogwood Health Trust, The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc.
Where is Constructive Management Foundation based?
Constructive Management Foundation is based in NC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Constructive Management’s filings →

More from the funding graph