Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Charles Koch Institute

Inspired by a recognition that free people are capable of extraordinary things, stand together fellowships supports educational programs and dialogue to advance these principles, challenge convention, and eliminate barriers that stifle creativity and progress.

$1.2M
Granted FY2022
33
Grants FY2022
17
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$48MPublic Benefit$14MCrime & Legal$11MInternational$7.2MCivil Rights$6.1MHuman Services$2.4MEnvironment$1.8MArts & Culture$1.8MOther$0
02FY2022 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 33 grants below total $769,323 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,217,943 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $448,620 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k21 grants · $167k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $202k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$8,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$446M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Poynter Institute for Media Studies Inc$300,000
Talent Market$100,000
Cato Institute$47,375
Texas Tribune$24,000
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft$21,592
Defense Priorities Foundation$21,000
Center for the National Interest$20,092
Nevada News Bureau Inc$16,000
Street Sense Inc$15,677
Eurasia Group Foundation$12,531
TechFreedom$12,000
John Quincy Adams Society$11,656
Bay City News Foundation$8,000
MinnPost$8,000
Enlace Latino NC Inc$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $5.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Future of Storytelling for Good Inc: $300k → 17%Roots of Progress: $250k → 8%Safe Families for Children Alliance: $8k → 14%College Bound Dorchester: $12k → 16%Edward Charles Foundation: $1.3M → 14%Edward Charles Foundation: $1.1M → 14%More in Common: $250k → 17%Defense Priorities Foundation: $1.5M → 14%College Bound Dorchester Inc: $12k → 16%More in Common: $75k → 17%College Bound Dorchester Inc: $8k → 16%Defense Priorities Foundation: $45k → 14%Defense Priorities Foundation: $21k → 14%Street Sense Inc: $16k → 14%Street Sense Inc: $8k → 14%Center for Civilians in Conflict: $91k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$77M · 117 repeat orgs$18M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

117 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2022, 92 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

117
116

Total granted

$77M
$18M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+20%

Still filing today

95%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationPublic BenefitArts & CultureInternationalCrime & LegalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CATO INSTITUTE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $4.4M · revenue +70%
  • TR
    THE REASON FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $2.8M · revenue +80%
  • BO
    Bill of Rights Institute
    3× · 2017–2021 · $2.5M · revenue +248%

Funded once

  • SP
    SUMMIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2020 · $1.6M · revenue -11%
  • OB
    ON BEING PROJECT
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue -61%
  • NI
    NATIONAL IMMIGRATION FORUM
    one grant, 2020 · $810k · revenue -40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
2
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
3
Institute for Public Accuracy

To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.

Arts & Culture
4
Frontiers of Freedom Institute

To educate the public on constitutional issues and public policy matters. We are dedicated to the principles of individual liberty, peace through strength, limited government, free enterprise, and the values embodied in the Declaration of…

Public Benefit
5
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
6
International Republican Institute

Iri advances freedom and democracy worldwide by developing political parties, civic institutions, open elections, democratic governance and the rule of law.

Education
7
American Press Institute Inc

American press institute acts as a scout on the frontier of technology and audience behavior to identify where change is occurring and helps news organizations learn how to implement and scale that change successfully so they have a…

Arts & Culture
8
Center for American Progress

The center for american progress (cap) is an independent nonpartisan policy institute that is dedicated to improving the lives of all americans through bold, progressive ideas, as well as strong leadership and concerted action. our aim is…

Civil Rights
9
National Institute for Public Policy Inc

The institute works as a public education organization that focuses on a wide spectrum of rapidly evolving foreign policy and international issues.

—
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Institute for Strategic Dialogue-Us

Isd-us is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit organization dedicated to defending democracy and individual rights against threats to public safety and national security. isd-us is at the forefront of analyzing and innovating solutions…

Education
12
Future Tech Insights Inc

The organization provides public education on artificial intelligence.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Media Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Environmental Conservation …Immigrant Worker SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Christian Missionary Organi…Community College Foundatio…Health Access Advocacy and …Youth Mentoring ProgramsLocal Food System Organizat…Youth Development ServicesPolicy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%34%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%31%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr16%5%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%5/244
the rest of the field
13%
240,391/1,819,321

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

240 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 240 of the 245 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

22
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
63
Early backer (in before they grew)
230/240
Grantees still filing
170/240
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

4point0 Schools — $3,750,000 · Education4point0 SchoolsTHE REASON FOUNDATION — $2,829,369 · EducationTHE REASON FOUNDATIONMINERVA UNIVERSITY — $1,890,000 · EducationMINERVA UNIVERSITYSUMMIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $1,640,000 · EducationSUMMIT PUBLIC SCHOOLSEdChoice Inc — $1,600,000 · EducationEdChoice IncBELLWETHER EDUCATION PARTNERS INC — $1,500,000 · EducationBELLWETHER EDUCATION PA…THE POYNTER INSTITUTE FOR MEDIA STUDIES INC — $1,224,000 · EducationTHE POYNTER INSTITUTE F…R STREET INSTITUTE — $986,786 · EducationCAPITAL PREPARATORY SCHOOLS INC — $800,000 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton University — $750,000 · Education+23 more — $3,572,289 · Education+23 moreCATO INSTITUTE — $4,403,750 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTETEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION — $2,055,175 · Public BenefitTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FO…INTERNATIONAL POLICY NETWORK US INC — $1,297,000 · Public BenefitINTERNATIONAL POLICY N…The Rand Corporation — $1,210,000 · Public BenefitThe Rand CorporationBARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $1,154,000 · Public BenefitBARRY GOLDWATER INSTIT…ON BEING PROJECT — $1,000,000 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR THE NATIONAL INTEREST — $934,135 · Public BenefitMACKINAC CENTER — $857,500 · Public BenefitPROPERTY AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH CENTER — $850,000 · Public BenefitAMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL — $654,000 · Public Benefit+21 more — $5,014,340 · Public Benefit+21 moreRECIDIVIZ INC — $4,453,000 · OtherRECIDIVIZ INCBill of Rights Institute — $2,516,000 · OtherBill of Rights InstituteTel Foundation — $2,101,890 · OtherTel FoundationTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES — $2,000,000 · OtherTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUB…TURNAROUND FOR CHILDREN INC — $1,662,706 · OtherNew Civil Liberties Alliance — $2,016,000 · OtherNew Civil Liberties AllianceNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER — $1,151,000 · OtherROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $2,300,000 · OtherROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INCQUINCY INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIBLE STATECRAFT — $1,235,184 · Other+72 more — $13,573,077 · Other+72 moreATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC — $1,905,000 · InternationalATLANTIC …INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP — $1,600,000 · InternationalINTERNATI…CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE — $1,163,000 · InternationalCARNEGIE …THE EURASIA FOUNDATION — $1,150,000 · InternationalTHE EURAS…TECHNOLOGY POLICY INSTITUTE — $760,000 · InternationalTECHNOLOG…+15 more — $1,716,148 · International+15 morePacific Legal Foundation — $2,054,481 · Crime & LegalNACDL FOUNDATION FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE — $816,000 · Crime & LegalCOUNCIL ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE INC — $785,000 · Crime & LegalTHE FAIRNESS CENTER INC — $475,000 · Crime & LegalLITIGATORS FOR LIBERTY NETWORK — $425,000 · Crime & LegalIMMIGRANTS LIKE US INC — $350,000 · Crime & LegalPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES — $268,000 · Crime & LegalTAKING ACTION FOR GOOD — $256,000 · Crime & LegalWISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY — $200,000 · Crime & Legal+5 more — $319,367 · Crime & LegalEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $2,450,000 · Human ServicesDefense Priorities Foundation — $1,587,000 · Human ServicesMORE IN COMMON INC — $325,000 · Human ServicesFOST FOR GOOD INC — $300,000 · Human ServicesTHE ROOTS OF PROGRESS — $250,000 · Human Services+4 more — $296,293 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC — $2,181,000 · Civil RightsActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty — $536,526 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR DEMOCRACY AND TECHNOLOGY — $328,000 · Civil RightsIndependent Women's Forum — $303,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $275,000 · Civil RightsMeasures for Justice Institute — $250,000 · Civil RightsPHOENIX CENTER FOR ADVANCED LEGAL & ECONOMIC PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES INC — $240,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $225,000 · Civil Rights+4 more — $268,044 · Civil Rights
Education$20,542,444Public Benefit$19,429,900Other$33,008,857International$8,294,148Crime & Legal$5,948,848Human Services$5,208,293Civil Rights$4,606,570

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRECIDIVIZ INC — $4,453,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $4,403,750 over 6y, 6.7% of budget4point0 Schools — $3,750,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetTHE REASON FOUNDATION — $2,829,369 over 6y, 9.0% of budgetBill of Rights Institute — $2,516,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $2,450,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $2,300,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC — $2,181,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetTel Foundation — $2,101,890 over 2y, 47% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION — $2,055,175 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation — $2,054,481 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetNew Civil Liberties Alliance — $2,016,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES — $2,000,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC — $1,905,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetMINERVA UNIVERSITY — $1,890,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetTURNAROUND FOR CHILDREN INC — $1,662,706 over 2y, 11% of budgetSUMMIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $1,640,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetEdChoice Inc — $1,600,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP — $1,600,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetDefense Priorities Foundation — $1,587,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetBELLWETHER EDUCATION PARTNERS INC — $1,500,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL POLICY NETWORK US INC — $1,297,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetQUINCY INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIBLE STATECRAFT — $1,235,184 over 3y, 16% of budgetTHE POYNTER INSTITUTE FOR MEDIA STUDIES INC — $1,224,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetThe Rand Corporation — $1,210,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE — $1,163,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $1,154,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER — $1,151,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetTHE EURASIA FOUNDATION — $1,150,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetON BEING PROJECT — $1,000,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetR STREET INSTITUTE — $986,786 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetCENTER FOR THE NATIONAL INTEREST — $934,135 over 3y, 21% of budgetMACKINAC CENTER — $857,500 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetPROPERTY AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH CENTER — $850,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetNACDL FOUNDATION FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE — $816,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION FORUM — $810,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCAPITAL PREPARATORY SCHOOLS INC — $800,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetCOUNCIL ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE INC — $785,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetTECHNOLOGY POLICY INSTITUTE — $760,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $750,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL — $654,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $632,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION — $614,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetTHE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE — $600,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE — $564,651 over 3y, 18% of budgetSCHOOLHOUSEWORLD INC — $550,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetHOME BUILDERS INSTITUTE — $550,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH — $538,000 over 3y, 8.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charles Koch Foundati…The Seminar Network I…Donors Trust IncThe Lynde and Harry B…Adolph Coors Foundati…Atlas Economic Resear…Carnegie Corporation …Sarah Scaife Foundati…Bradley Impact Fund I…State Policy NetworkJohn William Pope Fou…The Roe Foundation
Charles Koch FoundationVA153.1× affinity80 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charles Koch Foundation · The Seminar Network Inc · Donors Trust Inc · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Adolph Coors Foundation · Atlas Economic Research Foundation · Carnegie Corporation of New York · Sarah Scaife Foundation Incorporated · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · State Policy Network · John William Pope Foundation · The Roe Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Charles Koch Institute funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 160%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
  • Uncornered Inc — 24% of income from government
  • Thread Inc — 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
  • Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
  • The Poynter Institute for Media Studies Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
16get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 245 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $663k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines