· Private foundation
Conservation Food and Health Foundation Inc C/O Gma Foundations
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of CONSERVATION FOOD AND HEALTH FOUNDATION INC C/O GMA FOUNDATIONS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k31 grants · $1.0M
- $50k–250k18 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GUNUNG PALUNG ORANGUTAN CONSERVATION PROGRAM | $135,000 |
| CONCERN AMERICA INC | $100,000 |
| GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND | $100,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY | $85,665 |
| PACIFIC ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES CENTER | $70,000 |
| RESTORE HOPE | $50,000 |
| DEVELOPMENT IN GARDENING | $50,000 |
| GRAIN | $50,000 |
| ADOLESCENT HEALTH CHAMPIONS INC | $50,000 |
| GLOBAL SEED SAVERS | $50,000 |
| AMAZON WATCH | $50,000 |
| TIP GLOBAL HEALTH | $50,000 |
| ONE HEART WORLD-WIDE | $50,000 |
| CANOPY (TIDES FOUNDATION) | $50,000 |
| FUNDACION VIDA SILVESTRE ARGENTINA | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 71% of grant dollars ($8.8M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 29% that went abroad ($3.7M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $469k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 29% of all-years giving ($3.7M)
39 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
83 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2024, 49 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $579k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GPGunung Palung Orangutan Conservation Program Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $363k · revenue +334%
- IRInternational Rivers Network8× · 2017–2024 · $275k · revenue +3%
- AWAmazon Watch Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $270k · revenue +143%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $77k
- OGORGANIC GROWERS RESEARCH AND INFORMATION SHARING None grant, 2023 · $72k · revenue -66% · 28% of their budget
- DRDEVELOPING RADIO PARTNERS INCone grant, 2021 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.
RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
The Natura Bolivia Foundation is dedicated to implementing, and evaluating the impact of conservation and development programs, with a focus on watershed conservation, protected areas, and incentive based conservation in Bolivia. We work…
The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.
Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.
Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…
Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…
The Fossey Fund is dedicated to the conservation and study of gorillas in Africa through a successful, people-centered approach: 1) Providing daily protection to gorillas, 2) Scientific research providing critical data on gorillas and…
Endangered Species International is strongly committed to reversing the trend of human-induced species extinction, saving endangered animals, and preserving wild places.
In order to advance scientific and conservation goals Field Projects International FPI conducts tropical biology research at locations around the world. Our long-term educational programs and field courses support this mission by training…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Heart Worldwide and the most unlike its peers is The Technology Exchange Lab Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 191 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Gunung Palung Orangutan Conservation Program Inc ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND ↗
- Who funds International Rivers Network ↗
- Who funds Amazon Watch Inc ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES CENTER ↗
- Who funds Infact DBA Corporate Accountability ↗
- Who funds EARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds BANK INFORMATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds Ecology Action of the Midpeninsula ↗
- Who funds HESPERIAN HEALTH GUIDES ↗
- Who funds THE ADDIS CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds CONCERN AMERICA ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL SEED SAVERS ↗
- Who funds SEMILLA NUEVA ↗
- Who funds MARALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds OCCUPATIONAL KNOWLEDGE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds CENTRE FOR WILDLIFE STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE INC ↗
- Who funds ECUMENICAL PROJECT FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION INC ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPING RADIO PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds TIP Global Health ↗
- Who funds NATURA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds SENA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAVING MOTHERS ↗
- Who funds ST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Face To Face Project Inc ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation) · National Geographic Society · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Together Women Rise · Izumi Foundation · Mulago Foundation · Tides Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Clif Family Foundation · Rippleworks Inc · Arcus Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Conservation Food and Health Foundation Inc C/O Gma Foundations funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Gunung Palung Orangutan Conservation Program Inc — 27% of income from government
- EcoHealth Alliance Inc — 24% of income from government
- Centre for Wildlife Studies Inc — 20% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Infact Dba Corporate Accountability — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.