Skip to content
Confluentorg Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Confluentorg Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$323k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$323k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

International$1.3MHousing & Shelter$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kYouth Development$25kHealth$10kFood & Nutrition$10kRecreation & Sports$8kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$323,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 100% of reported assets are held in Confluent Inc.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GIVEWELL$323,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 11% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION (DESTINATION HOME): $25k → 8%LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE (KEEP TAHOE BLUE): $3k → 8%GIVE WELL: $350k → 10%DIRECT RELIEF: $14k → 14%UNICEF USA: $10k → 17%OUT YOUTH: $25k → 10%USA FOR UNHCR: $30k → 14%CARE: $5k → 13%MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%CRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES (SIERRA COMMUNITY HOUSE): $3k → 10%GIVEWELL: $323k → 10%WORLD TELEHEALTH INITIATIVE: $5k → 14%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $40k → 14%FEEDING AMERICA (SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK): $10k → 14%GIVEWELL: $300k → 10%INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: $36k → 14%GIVEWELL: $250k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
4
Strategic Global Response

Strategic Global Response effectively and efficiently delivers life-saving care to people affected by humanitarian crises, in the most challenging situations on earth

Human Services
5
Wildlife Conservation Global Inc

Wildlife conservation global, inc. operates the okapi conservation project (ocp) which works in the democratic republic of the congo with the institute in congo for the conservation of nature (iccn) and local communities throughout the…

Animals
6
Crisis Response International

To resource, train, and mobilize volunteers, churches,& other organizations to respond to disasters in the united states & world-wide

Public Safety & Disaster
7
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
8
International Medical Relief

To provide access to medical care in underserved and vulnerable communities around the world to improve the health, wellness, medical relief and quality of life to those populations most in need.

Health
9
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
10
International Relief Teams

International relief teams is a non-profit international relief and development organization dedicated to allieviating human suffering by providing critical assistance to victims of disaster, profound poverty and neglect worldwide

International
11
Globus Relief

The mission of globus relief is to improve the delivery of healthcare worldwide by gathering, processing and distributing surplus medical and health supplies to charities at home and abroad.

International
12
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crisis Intervention Services Dba Sierra Community House; the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CLEAR FUND: $1,223,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEAR FUNDWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $39,599 · InternationalWORLD CENT…INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: $36,082 · InternationalINTERNATIO…United States Association for UNHCR: $30,158 · InternationalUnited Sta…DIRECT RELIEF: $14,067 · InternationalDIRECT REL…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,094 · InternationalUNITED STA…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $5,202 · InternationalSILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION (DESTINATION HOME): $25,000 · OtherUNITED WAY (THE FAMILY CRISIS CENTER): $25,000 · OtherFEEDING AMERICA (SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK): $10,000 · OtherACHIEVE TAHOE: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherLake Tahoe Wildlife Care Inc: $3,000 · OtherCRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES DBA SIERRA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $3,000 · OtherLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE (KEEP TAHOE BLUE): $3,000 · OtherOut Youth Inc: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · HealthWORLD TELEHEALTH INITIATIVE: $5,000 · HealthTAHOE MAGIC INC: $3,000 · Education
Philanthropy$1,223,000International$135,202Other$82,000Youth Development$25,000Health$10,000Education$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $1,223,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $39,599 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: $36,082 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $30,158 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOut Youth Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $14,067 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,094 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVE TAHOE: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $5,202 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD TELEHEALTH INITIATIVE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLake Tahoe Wildlife Care Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES DBA SIERRA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTAHOE MAGIC INC: $3,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tahoe Community Found…The San Francisco Fou…The Blackbaud Giving …Network for GoodVanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Tahoe Community FoundationNV13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tahoe Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Confluentorg Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Confluentorg Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Confluentorg Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Confluentorg Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Confluentorg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home