· Private foundation
Cone Automatic Machine Co Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of Cone Automatic Machine Co Charitable Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k31 grants · $76k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Mt Ascutney Hospital & Health Center | $11,000 |
| Keene State College | $8,000 |
| University of Vermont | $8,000 |
| Visiting Nurse Alliance of VT & NH | $6,000 |
| Roger Williams University | $4,000 |
| Historic Homes of Runnemede | $4,000 |
| Providence College | $4,000 |
| David's House | $4,000 |
| Ohio University | $3,500 |
| Plymouth State University | $3,000 |
| Windsor Public Library | $3,000 |
| Champlain College | $3,000 |
| University of New Hampshire | $2,000 |
| Vermont State University | $2,000 |
| Bentley University | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 17% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
52 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WHWindsor Hospital Corporation4× · 2017–2020 · $33k · revenue +45%
- DHDAVID'S HOUSE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +251%
- WPWINDSOR PUBLIC LIBRARY9× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of Massachusettsone grant, 2020 · $3k
EMERSON COLLEGEone grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +3%- UOUniversity of Californiaone grant, 2022 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
to provide a rigorous and transformative liberal arts education that prepares students to become thoughtful, engaged citizens.
Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.
Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Since 1775, the mission of Hampden-Sydney College has been to form good men and good citizens in an atmosphere of sound learning.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Anselm College and the most unlike its peers is Windsor Public Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 75 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Windsor Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds DAVID'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WINDSOR PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds Southern New Hampshire University ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PRECISION MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE GREEN AND WHITE MTNS ↗
- Who funds Norwich University ↗
- Who funds Windsor County Mentors Inc ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC WINDSOR INC ↗
- Who funds Historic Homes of Runnemede Inc ↗
- Who funds BENTLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds University of New England ↗
- Who funds WHEATON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds New England College ↗
- Who funds Unity Environmental University ↗
- Who funds BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SAINT MICHAEL'S COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SAINT ANSELM COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Cedarville University ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MARYMOUNT MANHATTAN COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Davis Educational Foundation · Claremont Savings Bank Foundation · The Couch Family Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cone Automatic Machine Co Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Windsor Public Library — 9% of income from government
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute — 8% of income from government
- Norwich University — 4% of income from government
- Windsor Hospital Corporation — 1% of income from government
- Bentley University — 1% of income from government
- Seton Hall University — 1% of income from government
- Quinnipiac University — 0% of income from government
- Nichols College — 0% of income from government
- Saint Michael's College — 0% of income from government
- Wheaton College — 0% of income from government
- Champlain College Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- Emerson College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.