· Private foundation
Community Health Systems Inc
To Provide services an resources that enhance the community's capacity to achieve optimal health, wellness and quality of life through the management of its two health service affiliates.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k24 grants · $595k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| STURDY HEALTH | $100,000 |
| KYLE CARES FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FALL RIVER | $50,000 |
| MANET COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $48,250 |
| ASSOCIATES FOR HUMAN SERVICES | $42,000 |
| COMMUNITY SERVINGS | $40,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $36,000 |
| KENNEDY DONOVAN CENTER | $34,400 |
| SAFE COALITION | $34,000 |
| ATTLEBORO NORTON YMCA | $32,000 |
| THE LITERACY CENTER | $30,140 |
| COMMUNITY ACCESS TO RIDES | $27,000 |
| FRANKLIN FOOD PANTRY | $25,000 |
| MY BROTHERS KEEPER | $25,000 |
| FATHER BILL'S & MAINSPRING | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $641k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $380k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NHNEW HOPE INC2× · 2022–2023 · $115k · revenue +48%
- AYATTLEBORO YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION3× · 2022–2024 · $112k · revenue +52%
- KCKENNEDY-DONOVAN CENTER INC3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- HOHEALTHCARE OPTIONS INCone grant, 2020 · $2.3M · 59% of their budget
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $70k
- ODOUR DAILY BREAD KITCHENone grant, 2022 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Founded in 1973, bristol aging & wellness, inc. is a private non-profit corporation, designated as an aging services access point and an area agency on aging. bristol serves as the entry point for elder services in southeastern…
Brockton area arc inc will work in partnership with and for the community to provide advocacy, information and direct services that offer new opportunities and choice for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and…
Through support, challenge and opportunity, triangle empowers people with disabilities and their families to enjoy rich, fulfilling lives. we are committed to helping the world recognize that we are all people with ability.
To provide the community with comprehensive health care in dorchester, ma including primary and specialty care, home care, social services, women, infant and child care, and adult day health care.
Meet the workforce needs of employers and support economic development in greater new bedford.
To advance the interests of the human services sector and providers through advocacy, education, and engagement of diverse stakeholders for collective impact.
Provide specialized services to assist individuals and their families in overcoming the challenges of developmental disabilities, mental illness, and medical conditions.
Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…
Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.
Hac's mission is to promote and implement the right of all people on cape cod and the islands to occupy safe and affordable housing. to achieve this goal, hac has concentrated its major programs around rental subsidies, shelter services,…
The purpose and mission of community counseling of bristol county, inc. (ccbc) is to develop and deliver compassionate, responsive, culturally competent, and quality mental health and substance abuse services to meet the…
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc of Bristol County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Triboro Youth Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOPEHEALTH COMMUNITY VNA INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHCARE OPTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds ATTLEBORO YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds STURDY HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds KENNEDY-DONOVAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds The Literacy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds MANET COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATES FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF BRISTOL COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds HEBRON FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC ↗
- Who funds FATHER BILL'S & MAINSPRING INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PAWTUCKET ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO SOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds AMEGOINC ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Adoption Resource Exchange Inc ↗
- Who funds TRIBORO YOUTH THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds American Credit Counseling Service Inc ↗
- Who funds SAFE COALITION INCORPORTED ↗
- Who funds My Brothers Keeper Inc ↗
- Who funds Franklin Food Pantry Inc ↗
- Who funds GREATER ATTLEBORO AREA COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds ATTLEBORO MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROWEST INC ↗
- Who funds JOE ANDRUZZI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FARM FRESH RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Sensata Technologies Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Mansfield Community Charitable Foundation Inc · Bluestone Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · The Harborone Foundation · Southcoast Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Attleborotaunton Inc · Amica Companies Foundation · Massachusetts Bankers Association Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Health Systems Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Attleboro Enterprises Inc — 86% of income from government
- Amegoinc — 76% of income from government
- New Hope Inc — 73% of income from government
- Associates for Human Services Inc — 64% of income from government
- Kennedy-Donovan Center Inc — 62% of income from government
- The Arc of Bristol County Inc — 55% of income from government
- Robbins Childrens Programs Inc — 37% of income from government
- Manet Community Health Center Inc — 25% of income from government
- Father Bill's & Mainspring Inc — 24% of income from government
- The Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro South Inc — 13% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- Safe Coalition Incorported — 6% of income from government
- Triboro Youth Theatre Inc — 4% of income from government
- Franklin Food Pantry Inc — 3% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Clubs of Metrowest Inc — 2% of income from government
- Attleboro Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.