Skip to content
Community Health Provider Alliance at a glance

· Public charity

Community Health Provider Alliance

Our mission is to provide cost-effective, high-quality integrated primary care and preventative services to colorado's low-income working families and individuals.

$63k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$282kEducation$8k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $28,329, the rows itemized in this filing. The $63,344 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $35,015 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
$20,541
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SER$20,541
REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF COLORADO$7,788
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NORTHWEST COLORADO HEALTH: $13k → 6%MOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS: $9k → 8%STRIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 8%PEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $24k → 9%SUMMIT COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC: $11k → 9%SUNRISE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $18k → 9%MARILLAC CLINIC INC: $8k → 11%SOUTHWEST COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CE: $35k → 12%CLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SER: $21k → 12%REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF COLORADO: $8k → 12%VALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS: $12k → 17%HIGH PLAINS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $8k → 19%STRIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 8%SUMMIT COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC: $11k → 9%SOUTHWEST COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CE: $12k → 12%CLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SER: $17k → 12%LA CLINICA TEPEYAC INC: $6k → 12%VALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS: $12k → 17%HIGH PLAINS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $7k → 19%CLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SER: $17k → 12%VALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS: $12k → 17%CLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SER: $9k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$203k · 5 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$203k
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+43%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES
    4× · 2020–2024 · $64k · revenue +152%
  • SC
    SOUTHWEST COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $47k · revenue +44%
  • VH
    VALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $36k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • PV
    PEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS
    one grant, 2022 · $24k · revenue +4%
  • SC
    SUNRISE COMMUNITY HEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue +23%
  • NC
    NORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue +146%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pueblo Community Health Center Inc

To provide primary health care to those in need by offering top quality care through accessibility, leadership, and financial independence.

—
2
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
3
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
4
Vail Health Services

Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.

Health
5
Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health
6
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
7
Challis Area Health Center Inc

We provide quality healthcare to our community.

—
8
Mountain Park Health Center

Mountain park health center works with the communities it serves to sustain and improve health by providing affordable primary care to those who need it most. our commitment to the community is to keep healthcare affordable and accessible.

Health
9
Western Colorado Healthcare Alliance

To help rural providers with collaborative solutions and resources focusing on rural healthcare.

Education
10
Vvmc Diversified Services

Elevating health across our mountain communities.

Health
11
La Clinica Del Valle Family Health Care Center Inc

La clinica provides primary and preventive medical, dental, behavioral health, and other health promotion services to underserved and low-income patients.

—
12
Clinica Colorado

To provide equitable primary health care and resources to those with limited access across colorado, especially to those who are uninsured.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clinica Campesina Family Health Services; the most unlike its peers is Metro Community Provider Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES: $64,095 · HealthCLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICESSOUTHWEST COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $47,380 · HealthSOUTHWEST COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INCVALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $35,563 · HealthVALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS INCMETRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INC: $35,154 · HealthMETRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INCPEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $24,300 · HealthPEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERSSUMMIT COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INC: $21,030 · HealthSUMMIT COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INCSUNRISE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $18,000 · HealthSUNRISE COMMUNITY HEALTHNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION: $12,689 · Health+3 more: $23,300 · Health+3 moreREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $7,788 · Other
Health$281,511Other$7,788

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES: $64,095 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $47,380 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $35,563 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INC: $35,154 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $24,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INC: $21,030 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSUNRISE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION: $12,689 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARILLAC CLINIC INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA CLINICA TEPEYAC: $6,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Community He…Delta Dental Plan of …Caring for Colorado F…Caring for Colorado C…The Colorado Health F…El Pomar FoundationDirect ReliefThe Denver FoundationColorado Gives Founda…Mile High United Way …Rocky Mountain Health…Nextfifty Initiative
Colorado Community Health Network IncCO26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Community Health Network Inc · Delta Dental Plan of Colorado Foundation Inc · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund · The Colorado Health Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Direct Relief · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Nextfifty Initiative

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Health Provider Alliance funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Health Provider Alliance. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Health Provider Alliance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home