Skip to content

· Public charity

Community Health Network of Washington

To improve the health status of our communities through the provision of high-quality, affordable, community-based health care to underserved individuals and families, and through sustaining the network of community health centers and affiliated businesses.

$950k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Health$1.7M
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$321M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOSES LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$50,000
YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES$50,000
TRI-CITIES COMMUNITY HEALTH$50,000
PENINSULA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES$50,000
UNITY CARE NORTHWEST$50,000
HEALTHPOINT$50,000
NORTH OLYMPIC HEALTHCARE NETWORK$50,000
SEATTLE ROOTS$50,000
YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC$50,000
NEW HEALTH$50,000
COLUMBIA VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH$50,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF SPOKANE$50,000
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES$50,000
SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$50,000
VALLEY VIEW HEALTH CENTER$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COUNTRY DOCTOR COMMUNITY CLINIC: $50k → 9%COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE: $50k → 9%COLUMBIA VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH: $50k → 9%PENINSULA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $50k → 10%TRI-CITIES COMMUNITY HEALTH: $50k → 11%UNITY CARE NORTHWEST: $50k → 12%VALLEY VIEW HEALTH CENTER: $50k → 12%NORTH OLYMPIC HEALTHCARE NETWORK: $50k → 12%COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF SPOKANE: $50k → 12%NEW HEALTH PROGRAMS ASSOCIATION: $50k → 13%MOSES LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $50k → 14%YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC: $50k → 17%FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS (OKANOGAN): $50k → 17%NEW HEALTH: $50k → 13%SEATTLE ROOTS: $50k → 9%COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE: $50k → 9%PENINSULA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $50k → 10%UNITY CARE NORTHWEST: $50k → 12%LEWIS COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $50k → 12%NORTH OLYMPIC HEALTHCARE NETWORK: $50k → 12%COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF SPOKANE: $50k → 12%MOSES LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $50k → 14%COMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON: $50k → 17%FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS: $50k → 17%NEIGHBORCARE HEALTH: $50k → 9%COMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON: $41k → 17%NEIGHBORCARE HEALTH: $50k → 9%HEALTHPOINT: $50k → 9%SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $50k → 9%HEALTHPOINT: $50k → 9%SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 16 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
3

Total granted

$1.6M
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +4%
  • YN
    YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES
    3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +7%
  • NO
    NORTH OLYMPIC HEALTHCARE NETWORK
    3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • TC
    TRI-CITIES COMMUNITY HEALTH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +7%
  • YV
    YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +13%
  • CV
    COLUMBIA VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
2
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
3
Northwest Community Health Care

The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…

Health
4
Peninsula Community Health Services of Alaska

Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.

Health
5
One Community Health

Advance health and social justice for all members of our community.

—
6
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
7
La Pine Community Health Center

La pine community health center improves lives in our community through accessible and affordable healthcare provided with kindness, integrity, and respect.

Health
8
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
9
Challis Area Health Center Inc

We provide quality healthcare to our community.

—
10
Columbia County Community Healthcare Consortium Inc

The mission of the columbia county community healthcare consortium, inc. is improving access to healthcare and supporting the health and well-being of people in our rural community.

Health
11
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
12
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Care; the most unlike its peers is Sea Mar Community Health Centers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
17/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE: $100,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CAREYAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES: $100,000 · HealthYAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICESNORTH OLYMPIC HEALTHCARE NETWORK: $100,000 · HealthNORTH OLYMPIC HEALTHCARE NETWORKINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $100,000 · HealthINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICESMOSES LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $100,000 · HealthMOSES LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERCommunity Health Association of Spokane: $100,000 · HealthCommunity Health Association of SpokaneHEALTHPOINT: $100,000 · HealthHEALTHPOINTPENINSULA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $100,000 · HealthPENINSULA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICESFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS: $100,000 · HealthFAMILY HEALTH CENTERSSEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $100,000 · HealthSEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERSUNITY CARE NORTHWEST: $100,000 · HealthUNITY CARE NORTHWESTLEWIS COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $100,000 · HealthLEWIS COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICESSEATTLE ROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $100,000 · HealthSEATTLE ROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTHNEIGHBORCARE HEALTH: $100,000 · HealthNEIGHBORCARE HEALTHCOMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON: $91,168 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON+2 more: $100,000 · Health+2 moreNEW HEALTH PROGRAMS ASSOCIATION: $100,000 · OtherNEW HEALT…TRI-CITIES COMMUNITY HEALTH: $50,000 · OtherTRI-CITIE…
Health$1,591,168Other$150,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE: $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES: $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH OLYMPIC HEALTHCARE NETWORK: $100,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOSES LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Health Association of Spokane: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHPOINT: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS: $100,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITY CARE NORTHWEST: $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLEWIS COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $100,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEW HEALTH PROGRAMS ASSOCIATION: $100,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSEATTLE ROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $100,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEIGHBORCARE HEALTH: $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON: $91,168 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRI-CITIES COMMUNITY HEALTH: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delta Dental of WashingtonWA32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delta Dental of Washington · Seattle Foundation · Direct Relief · Reach Out and Read Inc · Washington Association for Community Health · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington · American Cancer Society Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Roots and Wings Foundation Inc · Ptso of Washington · Inatai Foundation · American Heart Association Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Health Network of Washington funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Health Network of Washington. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Community Health Network of Washington?

    Find your warmest path to Community Health Network of Washington through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Health Network of Washington’s filings →

    More from the funding graph