Skip to content
Community Health Councils Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Community Health Councils Inc

Community health councils, inc.

$24M
Granted FY2024still arriving
53
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$23MHuman Services$11MCommunity Improvement$5.8MYouth Development$4.9MEducation$3.5MCivil Rights$2.7MPhilanthropy$2.6MHousing & Shelter$1.5MOther$0
02FY2024 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 53 grants below total $21,773,001, the rows itemized in this filing. The $23,626,568 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,853,567 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $114k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $2.1M
  • $250k+25 grants · $19M
$200,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LACUSC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC$2,350,783
PROVIDENCE LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY$1,723,231
THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION$1,565,943
CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC$1,270,783
VISION Y COMPROMISO$1,216,101
ESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION$1,181,954
CORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT$1,175,531
PROVIDENCE HOLY CROSS FOUNDATION$1,159,018
ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION$1,047,318
ANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH$873,955
COMMUNITY PARTNERS$529,008
SOLEDAD ENRICHMENT ACTION INC$513,603
ST JOHN'S WELL CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER$484,311
COMMUNITY BUILD INC$465,539
EAST VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$452,373
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $8.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WATTS LABOR COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE: $376k → 14%WATTS LABOR COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE: $25k → 14%GRASS ROOTS NEIGHBORS: $15k → 14%URBAN UPLIFT: $55k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $1.3M → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $157k → 14%ASIAN PACIFIC POLICY AND PLANNING COUNCIL: $1.3M → 14%ASIAN PACIFIC POLICY AND PLANNING COUNCIL: $1.0M → 14%ASIAN PACIFIC POLICY AND PLANNING COUNCIL: $516k → 14%ASIAN PACIFIC POLICY AND PLANNING COUNCIL: $434k → 14%Special Service Groups: $176k → 14%Special Service for Groups: $86k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $25k → 14%The Compton Initiative: $20k → 14%ALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 14%FATHERS AND MOTHERS WHO CARE INC: $293k → 14%FATHERS AND MOTHERS WHO CARE INC: $8k → 14%UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT: $439k → 14%UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT: $329k → 14%UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT: $310k → 14%UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT: $279k → 14%FUND FOR GUARANTEED INCOME: $1.2M → 14%MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH: $26k → 14%FUND FOR GUARANTEED INCOME: $305k → 14%WATCHITGROW INCORPORATED: $53k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$50M · 51 repeat orgs$6.8M to everyone else

51 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
42

Total granted

$50M
$5.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+31%

Still filing today

76%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +117% · 45% of their budget
  • AE
    AAPI EQUITY ALLIANCE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +141% · 35% of their budget
  • EAST LOS ANGELES WOMEN'S CENTER
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2.9M · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CROSSROADS
    one grant, 2021 · $1.3M · revenue +16% · 33% of their budget
  • TC
    THE CONNIE RICE INSTITUTE FOR URBAN PEACEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $735k · revenue ×180
  • US
    UNITED STATES CATHLOC CONFERENCE
    one grant, 2021 · $646k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Instituto De Educacion Popular Del Sur De California

strengthening the leadership and workforce skills of Day Laborers and Domestic Workers. through 5 Day Labor Centers, Workers Health Program & Mujeres en Accion using Education & outreach empowerment tools

Unclassified
2
Trauma Informed La
Civil Rights
3
Los Angeles Black Worker Center

The mission of the Los Angeles Black Worker Center is to increase access to quality jobs, reduce employment discrimination, and improve industries that employ black workers through action and unionization.

Employment
4
Community Development Technologies Center

To build livable and economically viable communities in the low income areas of This is accomplished by Greater Los Angeles strengthening the skils and self-sufficiency of residents, businesses of residents, businesses and community…

Community Improvement
5
Economic Development Corporation of Los Angeles County

The function of the corporation shall be to ease the burdens of government by assisting, implementing, supporting and/or contributing to the support of programs, projects and activities of a public nature. which are directed toward…

—
6
The City of Los Angeles Workforce Development Board

The Workforce Development Board promotes workforce development activitieswhich connect Los Angeles jobseekers and youth to training, workforce preparedness and employment opportunities. Facilitates placing youth into private,public &…

—
7
African Com Public Health Coalition

To improve personal and community health and wellness within the african community by increasing the availability of culturally relevant physical and mental health services.

Health
8
The Anti-Recidivism Coalition

The anti-recidivism coalition (arc) works to end mass incarceration in california. to ensure our communities are safe, healthy, and whole, arc empowers formerly and currently incarcerated people to thrive by providing a support network,…

Crime & Legal
9
Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles County

Ccalac empowers community health centers to remain at the forefront of health care transformation. we forge partnerships, foster innovation, promote health equity, and advocate for the communities they serve.

Health
10
League of Women Voters of Los Angeles

The League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and…

—
11
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
12
Southside Coalition of Community Health Centers

The Southside Coalition of Community Health Centers is a nonprofit organization established to sustain, coordinate, and improve health care access and delivery to impoverished and vulnerable community members of South Los Angeles.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Partners; the most unlike its peers is Polos Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

16
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
75/78
Grantees still filing
58/78
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOS ANGELES GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $3,494,520 · OtherLOS ANGELES GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION …COMMUNITY BUILD INC: $2,422,268 · OtherCOMMUNITY BUILD INCEAST VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $2,238,964 · OtherEAST VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $1,642,380 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATIONHEALTH JUSTICE ACTION FUND: $1,499,314 · OtherHEALTH JUSTICE ACTION FUNDPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC: $1,054,677 · OtherVISION Y COMPROMISO: $1,269,674 · OtherESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION: $1,519,376 · OtherESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATIONCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT: $1,351,686 · OtherCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT+50 more: $7,634,627 · Other+50 moreEAST LOS ANGELES WOMEN'S CENTER: $2,920,745 · HealthEAST LOS ANGELES WOM…SOLEDAD ENRICHMENT ACTION INC: $2,679,041 · HealthSOLEDAD ENRICHMENT A…CLINICA MSR OSCAR A ROMERO: $2,619,351 · HealthCLINICA MSR OSCAR A …PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA: $1,159,018 · HealthPROVIDENCE HEALTH & …ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $1,047,318 · HealthALTAMED HEALTH SERVI…+3 more: $293,687 · HealthAAPI EQUITY ALLIANCE: $3,257,752 · Human ServicesAAPI EQUITY ALLIA…Fund for Guaranteed Income: $1,554,000 · Human ServicesFund for Guarante…CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $1,428,158 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S INSTIT…UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT INC: $1,356,588 · Human ServicesUNITED AMERICAN I…WATTS LABOR COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE: $400,999 · Human ServicesFathers and Mothers Who Care: $300,449 · Human Services+8 more: $471,436 · Human Services+8 moreCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $1,277,973 · Community ImprovementANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH: $961,558 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY REFLECTIONS INC: $447,533 · Community ImprovementTHE EXPERIENCE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $336,871 · Community ImprovementWillowbrook Inclusion Network: $335,544 · Community ImprovementCOMPTON ADVOCATES COALITION: $216,185 · Community ImprovementAARON COMMUNITY CULTURAL CENTER: $161,843 · Community Improvement+6 more: $237,667 · Community ImprovementRESILIENT AGENCY: $2,103,605 · Youth DevelopmentGirls Club of Los Angeles: $681,066 · Youth DevelopmentCOALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $407,301 · Youth DevelopmentProject Hope CA Inc: $321,499 · Youth DevelopmentSISTERS OF WATTS: $262,301 · Youth Development+1 more: $71,667 · Youth DevelopmentThe Childrens Center of the Antelope Valley: $1,704,373 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CROSSROADS: $1,292,813 · Crime & LegalTHE CONNIE RICE INSTITUTE FOR URBAN PEACE: $734,779 · Crime & LegalPROVIDENCE LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY FOUNDATION: $2,543,804 · PhilanthropyST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH: $577,421 · Philanthropy+1 more: $18,750 · Philanthropy
Other$24,127,486Health$10,719,160Human Services$8,769,382Community Improvement$3,975,174Youth Development$3,847,439Crime & Legal$3,731,965Philanthropy$3,139,975

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOS ANGELES GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $3,494,520 over 4y, 45% of budgetAAPI EQUITY ALLIANCE: $3,257,752 over 4y, 35% of budgetEAST LOS ANGELES WOMEN'S CENTER: $2,920,745 over 4y, 18% of budgetSOLEDAD ENRICHMENT ACTION INC: $2,679,041 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetCLINICA MSR OSCAR A ROMERO: $2,619,351 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetPROVIDENCE LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY FOUNDATION: $2,543,804 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY BUILD INC: $2,422,268 over 4y, 13% of budgetEAST VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $2,238,964 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetThe Childrens Center of the Antelope Valley: $1,704,373 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $1,642,380 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetFund for Guaranteed Income: $1,554,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION: $1,519,376 over 2y, 15% of budgetCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $1,428,158 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT INC: $1,356,588 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT: $1,351,686 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CROSSROADS: $1,292,813 over 1y, 33% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $1,277,973 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetVISION Y COMPROMISO: $1,269,674 over 2y, 10% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA: $1,159,018 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC: $1,054,677 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $1,047,318 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH: $961,558 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetGirls Club of Los Angeles: $681,066 over 3y, 32% of budgetST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH: $577,421 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY REFLECTIONS INC: $447,533 over 3y, 44% of budgetCOALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $407,301 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWATTS LABOR COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE: $400,999 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE: $398,634 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES UNIVERSAL PRESCHOOL: $370,819 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE EXPERIENCE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $336,871 over 2y, 60% of budgetWillowbrook Inclusion Network: $335,544 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetProject Hope CA Inc: $321,499 over 2y, 34% of budgetSOCIAL ACTION PARTNERS: $314,747 over 2y, 35% of budgetSOUTH BAY CENTER FOR COUNSELING: $302,102 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetFathers and Mothers Who Care: $300,449 over 2y, 29% of budgetSpecial Service for Groups Inc: $262,686 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSISTERS OF WATTS: $262,301 over 2y, 21% of budgetLOS ANGELES CONSERVATION CORPS: $237,792 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $222,029 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMPTON ADVOCATES COALITION: $216,185 over 4y, 94% of budgetAARON COMMUNITY CULTURAL CENTER: $161,843 over 1y, 91% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $148,097 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASSET DEVELOPMENT RE-DEFINING EDUCATION: $147,500 over 1y, 24% of budgetWORKSITE WELLNESS LA: $137,641 over 1y, 18% of budgetFEAST Inc: $129,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetMEZTLI PROJECTS INC: $118,170 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetFOODCYCLE: $115,731 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetHOLLYWOOD FOOD COALITION: $110,740 over 2y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Weingart FoundationCalifornia Community …United Way IncKaiser Foundation Hos…Community PartnersThe California Wellne…The Ralph M Parsons F…Liberty Hill Foundati…Baby2babyThe California Endowm…Ccf Community Initiat…Shelter Partnership I…
Weingart FoundationCA53.2× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Weingart Foundation · California Community Foundation · United Way Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Community Partners · The California Wellness Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Baby2baby · The California Endowment · Ccf Community Initiatives Fund · Shelter Partnership Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Health Councils Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Health Councils Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Health Councils’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home