· Public charity
Community Cancer Fund
COMMUNITY CANCER FUND (ccf) works collaboratively with existing regional cancer organizations to identify and fund gaps in services provided to cancer patients.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $1,059,361 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,087,372 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $28,011 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k4 grants · $110k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $449k
- $250k+1 grant · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME | $125,001 |
| YMCA OF INLAND NORTHWEST | $100,000 |
| PEACEHEALTH ST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| CANCER CARE NORTHWEST FOUNDATION | $71,396 |
| CHILDHOOD CANCER COALITION | $52,500 |
| THE CENTENNIAL HOTEL | $40,000 |
| MULTICARE HEALTH SYSTEMS | $28,464 |
| ANNA SCHINDLER FOUNDATION | $22,000 |
| CAMP JOURNEY NW | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $146k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $142k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +18%- PIPROVIDENCE INLAND NORTHWEST FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2022 · $639k · revenue +67%
- YMYoung Men's Christian Association of the Inland Northwest8× · 2017–2024 · $440k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- KHKOOTENAI HOSPITAL DISTRICT (DBA KOOTENAI HEALTH)one grant, 2018 · $1.4M
- SFSWAGAR FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue -88% · 81% of their budget
- MPMontana Pediatric Cancer Foundationone grant, 2023 · $85k · revenue -88%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Children's cancer research fund fuels transformational research to bring better treatments and cures to children with cancer.
To oversee, coordinate and support the Pediatric Oncology Programs at Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.
Children's cancer fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in north texas.
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
To fund research projects directed toward a cure for childhood cancers
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childhood Cancer Coalition and the most unlike its peers is Swagar Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE INLAND NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE INLAND NORTHWEST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of the Inland Northwest ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CHILDHOOD CANCER ORGANIZAT ↗
- Who funds SWAGAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CANCER CARE NORTHWEST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds CHILDHOOD CANCER COALITION ↗
- Who funds PEACEHEALTH ST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MULTICARE HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds Montana Pediatric Cancer Foundation ↗
- Who funds MULTICARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
- Who funds KOOTENAI HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds RYPIEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ANNA SCHINDLER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Camp Journey NW ↗
- Who funds THE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION) ↗
- Who funds LIGHTNING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ROGER CLEMENS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHANE VICTORINO FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Cancer Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.