· Public charity
Combined Health Agencies Drive
Improving lives by raising funds for nebraska's health charities through workplace giving.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of COMBINED HEALTH AGENCIES DRIVE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 23 grants below total $791,385 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $829,752 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $38,367 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $509k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $274k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION MIDLANDS CHAPTER | $88,842 |
| BREAKTHROUGH T1D | $71,490 |
| AUTISM ACTION PARTNERSHIP | $61,420 |
| THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $51,949 |
| NEBRASKA KIDNEY ASSOCIATION INC | $47,924 |
| AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION | $38,322 |
| THE ALS ASSN MID AMERICA CHAPTER | $38,254 |
| CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA | $37,706 |
| NEBRASKA AIDS PROJECT | $36,266 |
| TEAM JACK | $33,856 |
| EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA | $30,757 |
| ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION NEBRASKA CHAPTER | $27,196 |
| CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION NE CHAPTER | $26,823 |
| UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF NEBRASKA | $25,628 |
| NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY NE CHAPTER | $25,307 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
30 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BTBREAKTHROUGH T1D8× · 2018–2025 · $917k · revenue +31%
- TATHE ALS ASSOCIATION MID-AMERICA CHAPTER8× · 2018–2025 · $344k · revenue +10%
- CFCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION8× · 2018–2025 · $334k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- ACAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCone grant, 2018 · $13k · revenue -82%
- NYNEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $12k · revenue +61%
- ODOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSEone grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
National brain tumor society unrelentingly invests in, mobilizes, andunites our community to discover a cure, deliver effective treatments,and advocate for patients and care partners.
To fund research to discover cures and more effective treatments for neuroendocrine cancers. the netrf is committed to improving the lives of those affected by neuroendocrine cancer by providing information & educational resources.
Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…
The foundation is committed to supporting neuroscience research that leads to advances in understanding of brain function and treatment of brain-related disorders.
To make individualized medicines routinely and rapidly accessible to rare disease patients worldwide.
The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
Advancing science, education, and careers to improve neurologic health for all.
The Nebraska Medical Center (TNMC)'s mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research, and extraordinary patient care.
The organization is a partnership of world leaders in als research and care focused on expediting breakthrough treatments and ultimately a cure for als while providing resources and equipment to those living with the disease now. the team…
Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Bleeding Disorders Foundation and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA KIDNEY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE ALS ASSOCIATION MID-AMERICA CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEAM JACK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AUTISM ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA AIDS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF NE INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds Haitian American Friendship Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds HEART HEROES INC ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC ↗
- Who funds INNOVATIVE BLOOD RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HARMONY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · The Enrichment Foundation · The Nebraska Medical Center · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Combined Health Agencies Drive funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Epilepsy Foundation of America — 22% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.