· Public charity
Colorado Immigrant Rights Coalition
COLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION (circ) was incorporated in 2010 as a non-profit corporation in the state of colorado.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $298,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $310,302 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,802 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $254k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LAMAR UNIDOS | $130,000 |
| CIRC ACTION FUND | $73,500 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE | $50,000 |
| COLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE | $25,000 |
| SPRING INSTITUTE FOR INTERCULTURAL | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $280k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +206% since the first grant, against +158% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACIRC ACTION FUND6× · 2017–2024 · $341k · revenue +139% · 42% of their budget
- LULamar Unidos LLC2× · 2020–2024 · $237k
- ANALIANZA NORCO2× · 2020–2021 · $25k · revenue +206%
Funded once
- AAACCOMPANIMENT AND SANCTUARY COALITION COLORADO SPRINGSone grant, 2020 · $54k · revenue -42%
- APAsian Pacific Development Center of COLORADOgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue +261%
- MFMI FAMILIA EN ACCIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +516%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The latina initiative is committed to amplifying the voices of marginalized communities. we encourage latinas to vote to ensure they are heard by elected leaders at all levels.
Colorado immigrant rights coalition (circ) was incorporated in 2010 as a non-profit corporation in the state of colorado. circ is a statewide, membership-based coalition of immigrant, faith, labor, youth, community, business and ally…
Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.
The Coalition is dedicated to educating Latino immigrant newcomers, celebrating hispanic culture, and advocating for underserved segments of the population. Programs and initiatives include economic development, legal counsel, community…
CO-ALAS is a professional education association that advocates for the continued development and placement of Latino/Latina administrators who are committed to quality public education for all students.
Provide low bono & pro bono legal immigration services.
The Coalition for Immigrant Mental Health (CIMH) is a collaborative, community based, and research-informed initiative that is a partnership between immigrants, regardless of status, mental health practitioners, community organizers,…
Promoting leadership development, community outreach and providing key services for immigrant integration in western Colorado
The coalition for missouri values seeks to bring members of our community together around a core set of values that undergird our society and community. together, we aim to gather information, educate and inform our fellow citizens and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mi Familia En Accion and the most unlike its peers is San Luis Valley Immigrant Resource. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CIRC ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds Lamar Unidos LLC ↗
- Who funds ACCOMPANIMENT AND SANCTUARY COALITION COLORADO SPRINGS ↗
- Who funds COLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds ALIANZA NORCO ↗
- Who funds SPRING INSTITUTE FOR INTERCULTURAL LEARNING ↗
- Who funds Asian Pacific Development Center of COLORADO ↗
- Who funds MI FAMILIA EN ACCION ↗
- Who funds SAN LUIS VALLEY IMMIGRANT RESOURCE ↗
- Who funds EL COMITE DE LONGMONT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Women's Foundation of Colorado Inc · Latino Community Foundation of Colorado Inc · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Colorado Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Colorado Immigrant Rights Coalition funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.