Skip to content
Colorado Coalition Against Domestic Violence at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Colorado Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Advancing the well-being of all coloradans through relationships free from abuse and oppression.

$79k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$319kCrime & Legal$146kHousing & Shelter$108kHealth$43kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kReligion$22k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
$66,670
Median grant
1
States reached
$968k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLORADO SUPPORTS CRIME VICTIM$66,670
SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%RESPONSE: $21k → 6%FAMILY TREE INC: $19k → 7%ADVOCATES OF LAKE COUNTY: $25k → 11%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIAN NONVI: $29k → 12%LATINA SAFEHOUSE: $25k → 12%YMCA OF PUEBLO: $7k → 15%RESPONSE: $21k → 6%FAMILY TREE INC: $11k → 7%RESPONSE: $19k → 6%SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $12k → 12%RESPONSE ASPEN COLORADO: $13k → 6%SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $11k → 12%TESSA: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$319k · 6 repeat orgs$344k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
16

Total granted

$319k
$278k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+23%

Still filing today

67%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    Response - Help for Survivors of Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault
    4× · 2020–2023 · $74k · revenue +512%
  • FT
    FAMILY TREE INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +97%
  • SD
    SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $23k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • SP
    SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $29k · revenue +14%
  • AO
    ADVOCATES OF LAKE COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +114%
  • UM
    UTE MOUNTAIN INDIAN TRIBE
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Safe House Inc

S.a.f.e. house is a community based non-profit organization committed to stop abuse in the family environment by providing a comprehensive approach to end domestic violence that includes crisis intervention, safe shelter, counseling,…

Human Services
2
Safe Nesttemporary Assistance for

Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.

Human Services
3
Estes Valley Crisis Advocates Inc

To provide crisis intervention, advocacy and support to victims of crime. The EVCA operates a Community Safe House to house victims of domestic violence and provides office and meeting space to the Organization

Community Improvement
4
Capital Area Family Violence Intervention Center Inc

To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…

Human Services
5
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
6
Latinos in Virginia Empowerment Center

Provide education, advocacy, and support to spanish speaking individuals affected by violence and injustice in virginia to ensure that they can access services to empower them to become happy, healthy, and self- sufficient.

Crime & Legal
7
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
8
Domestic Violence Sexual Assault Center Inc

Our mission is to provide compassionate support, resources, and advocacy for victims of violent crime. we are dedicated to empowering children, teens and adults in their journey to healing by offering a safe place, emotional care, and the…

Human Services
9
Clackamas Women's Services

Breaking the isolation of domestic and sexual violence.

Human Services
10
Lake County Crisis Center

A safe place is the leading advocate for eliminating domestic violence & human trafficking in northern illinois.

—
11
Community Beyond Violence

CBV heals the trauma of sexual assault and domestic violence by providing crisis intervention, safety, advocacy, and education to survivors and our community.

—
12
Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advocates of Lake County Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Memorial Hospital of Craig Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VOCES UNIDAS FOR JUSTICE: $85,500 · OtherVOCES UNIDAS FOR JUSTICEBRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION FOR EAGLE COUNTY: $85,250 · OtherBRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION FOR EAGLE COUNTYCOLORADO SUPPORTS CRIME VICTIM: $66,670 · OtherCOLORADO SUPPORTS CRIME VICTIMUTE MOUNTAIN INDIAN TRIBE: $25,000 · OtherUTE MOUNTAIN INDIAN TRIBESOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBE: $25,000 · OtherSOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBESHARE Inc: $25,000 · OtherSHARE IncTU CASA INCORPORATED: $25,000 · OtherTU CASA INCORPORATEDCOLORADO COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $22,000 · OtherCOLORADO COUNCIL OF CHURCHES+3 more: $23,000 · Other+3 moreResponse - Help for Survivors of Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault: $73,750 · Human ServicesResponse - Help for Survivors of Domest…FAMILY TREE INC: $29,900 · Human ServicesFAMILY TREE INCSAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC: $29,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONV…ADVOCATES OF LAKE COUNTY INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesADVOCATES OF LAKE COUNTY INCLatina SafeHouse Initiative: $25,000 · Human ServicesLatina SafeHouse InitiativeSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHOUSE DENVER INCTHREE BIRDS ALLIANCE: $11,000 · Human Services+2 more: $14,000 · Human Services+2 moreTHE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF CRAIG FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · HealthCOLORADO COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $18,405 · HealthHILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $7,200 · Health
Other$382,420Human Services$230,650Health$50,605

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVOCES UNIDAS FOR JUSTICE: $85,500 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION FOR EAGLE COUNTY: $85,250 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetResponse - Help for Survivors of Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault: $73,750 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetFAMILY TREE INC: $29,900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC: $29,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetADVOCATES OF LAKE COUNTY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSHARE Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetTHE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF CRAIG FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetLatina SafeHouse Initiative: $25,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetTU CASA INCORPORATED: $25,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $23,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOLORADO COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $18,405 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHREE BIRDS ALLIANCE: $11,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAFE SHELTER OF ST VRAIN VALLEY: $11,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $7,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PUEBLO COLORADO: $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTESSA: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetADVOCATES FOR VICTIMS OF ASSAULT INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPEACEWORKS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Colorado Health F…Colorado Gives Founda…El Pomar FoundationAnschutz Family Found…The Denver FoundationThe Women's Foundatio…Mile High United Way …Av Hunter Trust Incor…Daniels FundRocky Mountain Health…Colorado Association …Rose Community Founda…
The Colorado Health FoundationCO31× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Colorado Health Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Women's Foundation of Colorado Inc · Mile High United Way Inc · Av Hunter Trust Incorporated · Daniels Fund · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Colorado Association of Realtors Foundation · Rose Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Colorado Coalition Against Domestic Violence funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Colorado Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Colorado Coalition Against Domestic Violence’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home