How much did COLOR STREET FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

COLOR STREET FOUNDATION INC reported 10 grants totaling $521,556 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is COLOR STREET FOUNDATION INC based?

COLOR STREET FOUNDATION INC is based in NJ.

COLOR STREET FOUNDATION INC

Foundation Dossiers

· Public charity

COLOR STREET FOUNDATION INC

To empower people to achieve personal success and financial freedom through training and to further philanthropic missions to cure diseases and end poverty.

$522k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$27k

Largest

01What you fund

0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Health$3.7MHuman Services$569kPhilanthropy$395kPublic Safety & Disaster$335kAnimals$200kInternational$170kCommunity Improvement$90kFood & Nutrition$50kHousing & Shelter$30kOther$1.2M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

alzheimer's diseaseanimalsencourageinspireviolencesurvivorsrainn

2020

spaceplacehealing processheartpersonsmultiple sclerosisway

2021

epilepsydomestic violencefindovarian cancerpromotessafetybetter treatments

2022

toys christmasless fortunatefortunate childrenaddictionmbcadoptiondown syndrome

2023

autoimmunemilitaryyoung adultsdogssexuallosssuicide

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$27k

Total assets

Largest grants

MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION$27,206
HOSPICE FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$20,000
ST JOSEPH'S HEALTH FOUNDATION$15,000
NAT ALLIANCE FOR EATING DISORDERS$15,000
BEST BUDDIES INTERNATIONAL$10,000
SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORP$10,000
SAFE PROJECT$10,000
THE TREVOR PROJECT INC$10,000
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
LIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $379k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 9%. 44% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$5.1M · 40 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +81% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

40 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.1M

$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%

+33%

Still filing today

98%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION
6× · 2018–2023 · $335k · revenue +49%
LB
LIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER
6× · 2019–2024 · $265k · revenue +54%
NB
NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATN
4× · 2019–2022 · $235k · revenue +102%

Funded once

FH
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +32%
ND
NATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINEgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +157%
AMERICAN BRAIN TUMOR ASSOCIATION
one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Afe Foundation

The AFE Foundation is the leading expert in education and research and the largest support organization for impacted families and healthcare workers around the world with a mission to reduce mortality attributed to AFE.

Health

Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch funds & supports children's cancer research & provides education & resources to all those affected by children's cancer.

Health

American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health

CureCervicalCancer

Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.

International

Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health

National Coalition for Cancer

Advocates for changes in how the nation researches,regulates,finances & delivers quality cancer care.

Health

American Academy of Neurology

The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) is the leading voice in brain health. As the world's largest association of neurologists and neuroscience professionals with more than 40,000 members, the AAN offers access to continuing education,…

Community Improvement

Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy

Patient Access Network Foundation

As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…

—

Dr Susan Love Research Foundation

Eradicating breast cancer through innovative & collaborative research on cause & prevention.

—

Sarcoma Foundation of America

We advocate for sarcoma patients by funding research, increasing awareness, & providing patient education.

Arts & Culture

Arbor Research Collaborative for

To improve patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lupus Foundation of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Futures Without Violence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/80

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,485

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

79 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

79/79

Grantees still filing

62/79

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$3,697,500Other$1,415,000Human Services$568,500Philanthropy$394,706Public Safety & Disaster$335,000Animals$200,000International$170,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Express FoundationNY21.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · AbbVie Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · S&P Global Foundation · Salesforce Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation COLOR STREET FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

12get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PROMOTING AWARENESS VICTIM EMPOWERM.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.8× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 320131894 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PROMOTING AWARENESS VICTIM EMPOWERM, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 59% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Color Street Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Color Street Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

COLOR STREET FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

79 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Color Street Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

COLOR STREET FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

79 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Color Street Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph