Skip to content
College of St Scholastica Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

College of St Scholastica Inc

Shaped by the catholic benedictine heritage, the college of st.

$42M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$510k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.6MCommunity Improvement$184kHuman Services$148kHousing & Shelter$25kRecreation & Sports$19k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $744,206, the rows itemized in this filing. The $41,700,773 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $40,956,567 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $126k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
  • $250k+1 grant · $510k
$8,189
Median grant
1
States reached
$214M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ESSENTIA HEALTH$509,597
CENTRACARE$56,367
ST LUKES HOSPITAL ASSN OF DULUTH$37,943
FAIRVIEW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER-$30,325
DEER RIVER HEALTHCARE CENTER$21,903
ALLINA HEALTH$19,540
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER$15,939
ASTERA HEALTH$8,189
ST CLOUD HOSPITAL$7,335
RIVERWOOD HEALTHCARE CTR$7,122
LAKEWOOD HEALTH SYSTEM$6,869
ST MARY'S DETROIT LAKES HOSPITAL$6,152
COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIA$5,946
MANKATO CLINIC LTD$5,645
STELLIS HEALTH PA$5,334
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC: $16k → 9%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MN: $6k → 11%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MN: $5k → 15%NORTHWOOD CHILDRENS' SERVICES: $30k → 15%NORTHWOOD CHILDRENS' SERVICES: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 29 repeat orgs$298k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
31

Total granted

$3.7M
$280k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+19%

Still filing today

66%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    THE DULUTH CLINIC LTD
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +178%
  • CC
    CENTRACARE CLINIC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $298k · revenue +63%
  • HD
    HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $255k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • AC
    AITKIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL DBA RIVERWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $23k · revenue +94%
  • ST
    SANFORD THIEF RIVER FALLS
    one grant, 2022 · $19k
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $16k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Centracare Health System - Long Prairie

We're here for your whole life to listen, then serve, to guide and heal because health means everything.

Health
2
Prairie Lakes Health Care System Inc

We make a positive difference in the health of the patients and communities we serve.

Health
3
Centracare Health System - Melrose

We're here for your whole life to listen, then serve, to guide and heal because health means everything.

Health
4
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
5
Glencoe Regional Health Services

Glencoe regional health services exists to improve every life by offering high-quality, safe, and accessible healthcare. we are dedicated to strengthening healthcare by connecting our communities, enhancing the patient experience,…

Health
6
Riverview Healthcare Association

We deliver a healthcare experience that consistently exceeds patients' expectations through exceptional people - our people are our foundation. we employ trusted, dedicated professionals who serve with compassion, empathy and respect.…

Health
7
Centracare Health System - Sauk Centre

We're here for your whole life to listen, then serve, to guide and heal because health means everything.

Health
8
The Lakes Community Health Center Inc

To respond to the healthcare needs of our communities with an integrated array of quality services and actively remove barriers to wellness. the lakes community health center, inc. is proud to be a community health center (chc) working to…

—
9
Central Maine Medical Center

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
10
Weeks Medical Center

Weeks medical center's compassionate staff is committed to providing high quality and efficient health care services to ensure the well-being of our patients, families and communities.

Health
11
Centracare Clinic

We're here for your whole life to listen, then serve, to guide and heal because health means everything.

Health
12
Lakeshore Community Health Care Inc

Lakeshore community health care provides access to comprehensive, integrated health care, regardless of ability to pay, eliminating health disparities among the underserved.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lake Superior Community Health Center; the most unlike its peers is Candid. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
29/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE DULUTH CLINIC LTD: $1,500,051 · HealthTHE DULUTH CLINIC LTDCENTRACARE CLINIC: $298,477 · HealthCENTRACARE CLINICHUMAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $254,603 · HealthHUMAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER INCALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM: $225,209 · HealthALLINA HEALTH SYSTEMFairview Health Services: $186,004 · HealthFairview Health ServicesST CLOUD HOSPITAL: $157,511 · Health+24 more: $643,890 · Health+24 moreNYSTROM & ASSOCIATES LTD: $146,196 · OtherNYSTROM & ASSOCIAT…ACCEND SERVICES INC: $83,146 · OtherACCEND SERVICES IN…FAIRVIEW: $50,797 · OtherFAIRVIEWST CLOUD MEDICAL GROUP: $46,498 · OtherST CLOUD MEDICAL G…CUYUNA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $39,909 · OtherCUYUNA REGIONAL ME…CENTRACARE HEALTH: $28,704 · OtherASTERA HEALTH: $28,410 · Other+22 more: $229,276 · Other+22 moreNORTHWOOD CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY INC: $37,837 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC: $15,845 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $11,230 · Human ServicesCANDID: $5,946 · Philanthropy
Health$3,265,745Other$652,936Human Services$64,912Philanthropy$5,946

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DULUTH CLINIC LTD: $1,500,051 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRACARE CLINIC: $298,477 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $254,603 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM: $225,209 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFairview Health Services: $186,004 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST CLOUD HOSPITAL: $157,511 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLAKEWOOD HEALTH SYSTEM: $85,234 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDEER RIVER HEALTHCARE CENTER INC: $81,959 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSMDC MEDICAL CENTER: $81,308 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRange Regional Health Services: $68,815 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF DULUTH: $65,352 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetStevens Community Medical Center: $43,739 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWOOD CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY INC: $37,837 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST MARY'S REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER: $28,828 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN PINES MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $28,633 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASTERA HEALTH: $28,410 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $24,363 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAITKIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL DBA RIVERWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER: $23,369 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC: $15,845 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGrand Itasca Clinic and Hospital: $12,516 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $11,230 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER INC: $8,881 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorthland Counseling Center Inc: $7,676 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHPARTNERS RC: $7,199 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGROUP HEALTH INC: $7,136 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER & COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $7,122 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetLAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $7,075 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOLMSTED MEDICAL CENTER: $6,983 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILLE LACS HEALTH SYSTEM: $6,917 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCUYUNA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $6,707 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIDGEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $6,437 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANDID: $5,946 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONS HOSPITAL: $5,880 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRACARE HEALTH SYSTEM - MELROSE: $5,847 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE DULUTH CLINIC LTD ↗
  • Who funds CENTRACARE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds Fairview Health Services ↗
  • Who funds ST CLOUD HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds LAKEWOOD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds DEER RIVER HEALTHCARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SMDC MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Range Regional Health Services ↗
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF DULUTH ↗
  • Who funds Stevens Community Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWOOD CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN PINES MENTAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ASTERA HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds AITKIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL DBA RIVERWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COOK AREA HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Grand Itasca Clinic and Hospital ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds OPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Minnesota Hospital As…The Leona M and Harry…Ucare MinnesotaOtto Bremer TrustDelta Dental of Minne…Reach Out and Read IncAmerican Heart Associ…Amazonsmile Foundation
Minnesota Hospital AssociationMN32.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Minnesota Hospital Association · The Leona M and Harry B Helmsley Charitable Trust · Ucare Minnesota · Otto Bremer Trust · Delta Dental of Minnesota Foundation · Reach Out and Read Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization College of St Scholastica Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from College of St Scholastica Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on College of St Scholastica’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home