· Public charity
College of St Scholastica Inc
Shaped by the catholic benedictine heritage, the college of st.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $744,206 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $41,700,773 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $40,956,567 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $53k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $126k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
- $250k+1 grant · $510k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ESSENTIA HEALTH | $509,597 |
| CENTRACARE | $56,367 |
| ST LUKES HOSPITAL ASSN OF DULUTH | $37,943 |
| FAIRVIEW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER- | $30,325 |
| DEER RIVER HEALTHCARE CENTER | $21,903 |
| ALLINA HEALTH | $19,540 |
| HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $15,939 |
| ASTERA HEALTH | $8,189 |
| ST CLOUD HOSPITAL | $7,335 |
| RIVERWOOD HEALTHCARE CTR | $7,122 |
| LAKEWOOD HEALTH SYSTEM | $6,869 |
| ST MARY'S DETROIT LAKES HOSPITAL | $6,152 |
| COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIA | $5,946 |
| MANKATO CLINIC LTD | $5,645 |
| STELLIS HEALTH PA | $5,334 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TDTHE DULUTH CLINIC LTD9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +178%
- CCCENTRACARE CLINIC9× · 2017–2025 · $298k · revenue +63%
- HDHUMAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC6× · 2017–2025 · $255k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- ACAITKIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL DBA RIVERWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $23k · revenue +68%
- STSANFORD THIEF RIVER FALLSone grant, 2022 · $19k
- FSFAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INCone grant, 2022 · $16k · revenue -14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fairview is driven to heal, discover, and educate for longer, healthier lives.
Fairview is driven to heal, discover, and educate for longer, healthier lives.
We're here for your whole life to listen, then serve, to guide and heal because health means everything.
MaineHealth is a voluntary, not-for-profit community and referral system of hospitals, dedicated to providing high quality health care services to all persons who seek care regardless of their sex, race, religion, age, color, sexual…
We're here for your whole life to listen, then serve, to guide and heal because health means everything.
We're here for your whole life to listen, then serve, to guide and heal because health means everything.
Fort Loudoun Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.
Through excellence in healthcare and compassionate service, we care for our community.
To advance the health of our communities through excellence and discovery, inspiring each person to live their unique, best life.
University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.
Swedish Covenant Health follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."
University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centracare Health System - Melrose and the most unlike its peers is Candid. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE DULUTH CLINIC LTD ↗
- Who funds CENTRACARE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds Fairview Health Services ↗
- Who funds ST CLOUD HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds LAKEWOOD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds DEER RIVER HEALTHCARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SMDC MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Range Regional Health Services ↗
- Who funds ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF DULUTH ↗
- Who funds Stevens Community Medical Center ↗
- Who funds NORTHWOOD CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN PINES MENTAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds ASTERA HEALTH ↗
- Who funds HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds AITKIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL DBA RIVERWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds COOK AREA HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds Grand Itasca Clinic and Hospital ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds OPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Minnesota Hospital Association · The Leona M and Harry B Helmsley Charitable Trust · Ucare Minnesota · Otto Bremer Trust · Delta Dental of Minnesota Foundation · Reach Out and Read Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization College of St Scholastica Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.