· Private foundation
Cold Noses Foundation Inc
The mission of this rescue organization is to raise money to help find homes and safety for the most urgent need animals, focusing mainly on animals in areas the organization considers high-risk for animal endagerment areas such as greece, puerto rico and southern united states.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k19 grants · $74k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $93k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PEGASUS FOUNDATION | $92,961 |
| Individual grant recipient | $24,000 |
| LES CHATS DU MERCANTOUR | $10,000 |
| KOTOR KITTIES | $5,000 |
| STRAY ANIMAL PROJECT | $5,000 |
| PHOENIX CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA DOG RESCUE | $5,000 |
| LET'S SAVE THE STRAYS INTERNATIONAL | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| LUCK'S RESCUE | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,100 |
| FELINE RESCUE IN THE FERRY | $4,000 |
| SPAY NEUTER INCENTIVE PROGRAM OF OVERTON COUNTY | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PBPETS BROWARD INC2× · 2019–2020 · $15k · revenue +132%
- TCTWIN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY2× · 2020–2022 · $10k · revenue +48%
- IVINTERNATIONAL VETERINARY OUTREACH2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +211%
Funded once
THE CAT COLLABORATIVEone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -1%- AAANNIE AND MILLIES PLACEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +218% · 42% of their budget
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.
Very small operation, we do T/N/R in the local area
Animal Rescue - finding homes for abandoned animals in Granite City, spaying and neutering stray animals and feral cats
To manage feral and stray cat populations. The process involves trapping the cats in a humane manner, getting them spayed or neutered, vaccinated against rabies, and then returning them to their original location.
we exist to spay and neuter unwanted pets in our local area trying to find them a home to thrive in until the end of their time
Caring for strays through pure fundraising
Our mission is to move adoptable dogs and cats primarily from heavily-burdened areas to loving homes. We work with trusted partners throughout the country and around the world and facilitate vet care, transport, and adoptions to help…
To rescue cats in need provide them with necessary medical care and adopt them into forever homes.
Survivors Paws Animal Rescue Inc rescues dogs and cats from southern state kill shelters and off the streets to save them being euthanized. We also help contract by the pet population by spaying and neutering and educating the public on…
We are an animal rescue who takes dogs and cats from high kill shelters, off the streets and owner surrenders and get them vetted and adopted and we transport them out of high volume areas to the northeast.
Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Paw Warriors Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Cat Collaborative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 9 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 18% of your grantees by number, and just 19% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE PEGASUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KOTOR KITTIES ↗
- Who funds PETS BROWARD INC ↗
- Who funds THE CAT COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds TWIN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL VETERINARY OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds ANNIE AND MILLIES PLACE ↗
- Who funds THE PHOENIX CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RISE AGAIN ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
- Who funds African Wildlife Conservation Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds LAKE TRAVERSE ANIMAL REZCUE ↗
- Who funds RESCUE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds BRITTANY RESCUE IN TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds KAT USA ↗
- Who funds Lucks Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds STRAY ANIMAL PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Vet Treks Foundation ↗
- Who funds CLEAR CREEK CAT RESCUE ↗
- Who funds LAUREL CATS INC ↗
- Who funds RHODE ISLAND PARROT RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds LETS SAVE THE STRAYS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds PURRFECT MATCH CAT ADOPTIONS ↗
- Who funds COLORADO FELINE FOSTER RESCUE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Summerlee Foundation · BISSELL Pet Foundation · Greater Good Charities · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · Petsmart Charities Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cold Noses Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.