Skip to content
Coalition of Homeless Service Providers at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Coalition of Homeless Service Providers

To eliminate homelessness in monterey and san benito counties by promoting interagency coordination to develop and sustain a comprehensive system of housing and support services designed to maximize the self-sufficiency of individuals and families.

$3.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$899k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$16MEducation$683kPublic Benefit$300k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $38k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $770k
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.4M
$300,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES$898,634
CITY OF KING$468,342
STEP UP ON SECOND$433,312
SAN BENITO COUNTY$304,641
VETERANS TRANSITION CENTER$300,000
DOWNTOWN STREETS TEAM$219,809
INTERIM INC-SUN ROSE$205,700
COMMUNITY ACTION BOARD OF SANTA CRUZ$203,950
CENTRAL COAST CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING (CCCIL)$140,587
COMMUNITY HOMELESS SOLUTIONS$37,742
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%STEP UP ON SECOND: $433k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $385k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $248k → 14%DOROTHY'S: $293k → 12%DOROTHY'S: $46k → 12%DOROTHY'S: $28k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 11 repeat orgs$4.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against -26% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$12M
$4.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
-26%

Still filing today

73%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $504k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesEmploymentHealthEducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +67%
  • SU
    STEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +54%
  • II
    INTERIM INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $952k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • CO
    COUNTY OF MONTEREY
    one grant, 2021 · $4.0M
  • HR
    HOUSING RESOURCE CENTER OF MONTEREY COUN
    one grant, 2021 · $237k · revenue -26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
2
San Benito County Community Services Development Corporation

To pursue affordable housing for low to moderate income residents by fostering strategic relationships with other agencies.

Housing & Shelter
3
Sacramento Steps Forward

The Organization's mission is to ensure that individuals and families experiencing homelessness or the risk of homelessness are able to access housing services and resources on their path to economic stability. The Organization is the lead…

Human Services
4
Community Housing Works

Community housingworks ("chw or the organization") is a nonprofit california corporation incorporated on june 20, 1988. chw believes that opportunity begins with a stable home. the organization provides and builds life-changing affordable…

Housing & Shelter
5
Housing Choices Coalition for Persons With Developmental Disabilities Inc

To enhance the lives of people with developmental and other disabilities by creating quality, affordable housing options.

Housing & Shelter
6
Catalyst Housing Inc

Catalyst's mission is to provide affordable, very low-income permanent supportive housing in the community and mental health services to individuals with a serious and long-term psychiatric disability.

Housing & Shelter
7
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
8
Advocates for the Mentally Ill Housing Inc

To House and Support the most vulnerable residents of the Sierra Region.

Human Services
9
Alameda County Homeless Action Center

HAC assists homeless and mentally ill clients in the long and difficult process of becoming eligible for SSI and MediCal benefits. HAC provides assistance with other public benefits that clients need in the interim to survive until their…

Housing & Shelter
10
Peninsula Healthcare Connection Inc

Peninsula healthcare connection (phc), a palo alto based 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, was founded in 2005 as a collaborative venture between the community working group, palo alto medical foundation, and stanford university school of…

Health
11
Southern California Rehabilitation Services Inc

To operate community service centers to improve physical,social and financial conditions for the disabled and the elderly.

—
12
Transitionsmental Health Association

Transitions - mental health association is a nonprofit organization dedicated to eliminating stigma and promoting recovery and wellness for people with mental illness through work, housing, community and family support services.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Step Up On Second Street Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community Human Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COUNTY OF MONTEREY: $4,031,319 · OtherCOUNTY OF MONTEREYCOUNTY OF SAN BENITO HHSA: $2,357,232 · OtherCOUNTY OF SAN BENITO HHSAINTERIM INC: $952,025 · OtherINTERIM INCCENTRAL COAST CENTER FOR INDEPENDET LIVING: $885,950 · OtherCENTRAL COAST CENTER FOR INDEPENDET LIVINGCITY OF SALINAS-SPRUNG SHELTER SERVICES PROGRAM: $722,304 · OtherCITY OF SALINAS-SPRUNG SHELTER SERVICES PROGRAMCITY OF KING: $566,285 · OtherCITY OF KINGCOMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES: $3,623,196 · HealthCOMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICESSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $1,065,606 · Human ServicesSTEP UP O…Franciscan Workers of Junipero Serra: $367,233 · Human ServicesFrancisca…UNIVERSITY CORPORATION AT MONTEREY BAY: $683,460 · EducationDowntown Streets Inc: $404,791 · EmploymentCommunity Action Board: $203,950 · EmploymentCommunity Homeless Solutions: $250,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING RESOURCE CENTER OF MONTEREY COUN: $237,256 · Housing & ShelterVETERANS TRANSITION CENTER OF CALIFORNIA: $300,000 · Public Benefit
Other$9,515,115Health$3,623,196Human Services$1,432,839Education$683,460Employment$608,741Housing & Shelter$487,256Public Benefit$300,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES: $3,623,196 over 5y, 18% of budgetSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $1,065,606 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetINTERIM INC: $952,025 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetCENTRAL COAST CENTER FOR INDEPENDET LIVING: $885,950 over 5y, 13% of budgetUNIVERSITY CORPORATION AT MONTEREY BAY: $683,460 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDowntown Streets Inc: $404,791 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetFranciscan Workers of Junipero Serra: $367,233 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetVETERANS TRANSITION CENTER OF CALIFORNIA: $300,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCommunity Homeless Solutions: $250,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetHOUSING RESOURCE CENTER OF MONTEREY COUN: $237,256 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCommunity Action Board: $203,950 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Monterey Peninsula Fo…Community Hospital of…Sunlight GivingEast Bay Community Fo…Kaiser Foundation Hos…The David and Lucile …Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Monterey Peninsula FoundationCA21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Monterey Peninsula Foundation · Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula · Sunlight Giving · East Bay Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coalition of Homeless Service Providers funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coalition of Homeless Service Providers. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Coalition of Homeless Service Providers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home