· Private foundation
Cnh Industrial Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $8k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $272k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $472k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FEEDING AMERICA | $500,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA | $500,000 |
| THE UK ONLING GIVING FOUNDATION | $206,936 |
| TEAM RUBICON | $200,000 |
| FARM IN THE DELL OF THE RED RIVER VALLEY INC | $65,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY QUAD CITIES | $30,000 |
| GREATER SIOUX FALLS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $30,000 |
| LANCASTER LEBANON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $27,500 |
| ORTONVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL #2903 | $25,000 |
| SCHOOL DISTRICT OF TOMAHAWK | $25,000 |
| DUPAGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $25,000 |
| SIOUX FALLS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| RACINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT | $25,000 |
| CAMERON R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT | $15,000 |
| CONESTOGA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT | $14,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $369k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Feeding America4× · 2020–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +40%- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF RACINE AND KENOSHA COUNTIES4× · 2021–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +149% · 51% of their budget
- GPGLOBAL PHILANTHROPY PARTNERSHIP2× · 2022–2023 · $150k · revenue +105%
Funded once
- TRTEAM RUBICONone grant, 2021 · $500k
- TUTHE UK ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $188k
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.
Habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, community, and hope. through advocacy, collaboration, and leadership, hfh-mn advances the work of minnesota's habitat for humanity affiliates to create and preserve affordable…
The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Our mission is to strengthen the university of iowa through alumni engagement. we do this through our communications, alumni programs, and events.
Habitat for humanity of central iowa, inc. works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities with god's people in need by building houses, so that there are decent houses in decent…
The university of iowa center for advancement's mission is to advance the university of iowa through engagement and philanthropy. we serve our alumni and friends in the state and the region, throughout the country, and around the world. we…
The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.
Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.
End hunger together.
Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity of iowa brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope by partnering with local habitat for humanity organizations to offer financial products, resource development,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junior Achievement of South Central Pa and the most unlike its peers is Three Rivers United Temporary Housing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF RACINE AND KENOSHA COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL PHILANTHROPY PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds Lake Agassiz Habitat for Humanity ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds FARM IN THE DELL OF THE RED RIVER VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds DUPAGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - QUAD CITIES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF RACINE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SIOUX FALLS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
- Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER GRAND ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Habitat for Humanity International Inc · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw · Taylor Vern & Esther Char Trust · High Foundation · Arconic Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans-Group · Lancaster County Community Foundation · Wells Fargo Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Union Pacific Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cnh Industrial Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.