How much did CLAUSSEN E & M CHARITABLE TUW grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of CLAUSSEN E & M CHARITABLE TUW’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

grand

2022

—

2023

—

2024

—

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$17,500

Median grant

States reached

$890k

Total assets

Largest grants

HARGIS HOUSE WOMAN'S CLUB$17,500
NORTHWEST PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$17,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 93% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$72k · 3 repeat orgs$145k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$72k

$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%

+114%

Still filing today

100%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

PhilanthropyEducationHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NE
NORTHWEST EDUCATIONAL FDN
2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +42%
HU
HEARTLAND UNITED WAY INC
2× · 2021–2024 · $15k · revenue -4%
JA
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF LINCOLN INC
2× · 2021–2024 · $7k · revenue +2%

Funded once

GF
GRACE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +114%
CC
CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -38%
GN
GENTRAL NEBRASKA SPORTS COMPLEX
one grant, 2023 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Central Nebraska Growth Foundation

To engage in economic development acivities and to engage in other activities and programs to benefit and support the grand island area economic development corporation or preform or carry out the functions or purposes of the corporation…

Community Improvement

Grow Grand Island Inc

The organization's mission is to develop a collaborative and comprehensive approach to business and community growth and progress in grand island.

Community Improvement

Lincoln Land Community College

Cultivate and steward charitable gifts to enrich and support llcc students, programs and services.

Philanthropy

Grand Heritage Foundation Inc

Support for the grand community center

Recreation & Sports

Grand Island Area Clean Community

Generating public participation in solving environmental problems, educating and instilling an awareness of environmental litter, promoting a sense of pride, and organizing and providing volunteers for area clean up events in grand island…

Environment

Grand Haven Schools Foundation

To provide scholarships and support other educational initiatives of local schools

Education

Heartland Lakes Development Commiss

Inspire and retain economic growth

Community Improvement

Highland Community College Foundation

To provide grants & scholarships.

—

Greater Licking County Convention

Promote licking county tourism

—

Harbor Country Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and economic development in sw michigan.

—

Great Lakes Intercollegiate

To administer intercollegiate athletic programs for colleges and universities

Recreation & Sports

Iowa Great Lakes Chamber of Commerce

To advance tourism, assist in new and existing business development and promote economic, professional, cultural and civic interests in the iowa great lakes area.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Grand Island Community and the most unlike its peers is Hargis House Woman's Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

10/10

Grantees still filing

6/10

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$128,500Philanthropy$40,000Education$20,000Community Improvement$17,500Youth Development$6,500Housing & Shelter$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sn Bud and Gloria Wolbach Charitable FoundatiNE22.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sn Bud and Gloria Wolbach Charitable Foundati · Greater Grand Island Community · Taylor Vern & Esther Char Trust · Black Benjamin a Char · Cnh Industrial Foundation · Edgar & Frances Reynolds · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CLAUSSEN E & M CHARITABLE TUW funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NORTHWEST EDUCATIONAL FDN.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~24 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 363884415 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on NORTHWEST EDUCATIONAL FDN, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 24 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw?

Find your warmest path to Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CLAUSSEN E & M CHARITABLE TUW

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw?

More from the funding graph

CLAUSSEN E & M CHARITABLE TUW

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw?

More from the funding graph