Skip to content

Missouri · Private foundation

Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$40k
Granted FY2026(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2026
2
Organizations funded FY2025
100%
First-time grantees FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2026
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2026
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 6
FY2021 to FY2025
States reached, FY2026
1
Total assets, FY2026
$764k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2025, 100% of the organizations Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2026still arriving2$40k50%
FY20252$35k100%
FY20245$40k60%
FY20234$58k75%
FY20222$40k100%
FY20216$39kn/a
95% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$88kPhilanthropy$35kRecreation & Sports$30kHealth$20kArts & Culture$18kHousing & Shelter$9kYouth Development$9kPublic Benefit$3kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2026, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 11 grantees

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($71k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorthwest Education Foundation Inc: $65,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetGrace Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCentral Community College Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHeartland United Way Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJunior Achievement of Lincoln Inc: $6,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGrand Island Area Habitat for Humanity Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLiteracy Council of Grand Island Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCrossroads Center Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHall County Leadership Unlimited Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Taylor Vern & Esther Char TrustMO26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Taylor Vern & Esther Char Trust · Sn Bud and Gloria Wolbach Charitable Foundati · Edgar & Frances Reynolds Foundation Inc · Greater Grand Island Community Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Black Benjamin a Char · Virgil Eihusen Foundation Inc · Cnh Industrial Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw with peer funders

About Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw

How much does Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw give?
Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw reported 2 grants totaling $40,000 in its FY2026 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 6 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2025.
What does Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2026, its largest causes are Education (40%), Philanthropy (16%), Recreation & Sports (14%).
Who are Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2026: Northwest Education Foundation Inc ($65k), Grand Island Children's Museum ($25k), Grace Foundation Inc ($20k).
Does Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw fund new organizations?
In FY2025, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Taylor Vern & Esther Char Trust, Sn Bud and Gloria Wolbach Charitable Foundati, Edgar & Frances Reynolds Foundation Inc.
Where is Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw based?
Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Claussen E & M Charitable Tuw’s filings →

More from the funding graph