Skip to content

· Private foundation

Clayton a Struve Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$550k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$869kYouth Development$487kAnimals$445kEducation$441kFood & Nutrition$332kHuman Services$219kRecreation & Sports$208kPhilanthropy$167kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $358k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
$20,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Rheumatology Research Foundation$50,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$50,000
Camp Mishawaka$50,000
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$40,000
LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$36,000
Zoo and Aquarium Video Archive$35,000
VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION$35,000
Salvation Army$25,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$25,000
United Way of Metro Chicago$25,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$25,000
Misericordia$25,000
Nature Conservancy$25,000
National Ability Center$20,000
OWII Jack Russell Rescue$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $152k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%Western Sports Foundation: $25k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 14%Western Sports Foundation: $20k → 15%Western Sports Foundation: $15k → 15%Western Sports Foundation: $10k → 15%Western Sports Foundation: $10k → 15%FAMILY NETWORK: $2k → 8%FAMILY NETWORK: $2k → 8%Family Network: $2k → 8%Family Network: $2k → 8%Family Network: $2k → 8%FAMILY NETWORK: $2k → 8%Family Network: $2k → 8%Inspiration Corporation: $8k → 14%Inspiration Corporation: $5k → 14%Inspiration Corporation: $5k → 14%Inspiration Corporation: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 48 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
18

Total granted

$3.3M
$165k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+11%

Still filing today

48%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $330k · revenue +140%
  • RR
    Rheumatology Research Foundation
    6× · 2019–2025 · $265k · revenue +46%
  • TV
    THE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $215k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • M
    MIT
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • EL
    EDUCATIONAL LABS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • ZA
    Zoo and Aquarium Video Archive
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
4
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
Racine Zoological Society Inc

The mission of the racine zoological society is to foster an enlightening and affordable wildlife experience that improves the bond between people and nature. the society will provide for the recreation and education of the people, the…

Animals
7
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
8
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
9
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation

The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.

Animals
10
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
11
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
12
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Ability Center; the most unlike its peers is Flint Creek Wildlife Rehabilitation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
21/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $235,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMISHAWAKA FOUNDATION: $230,000 · OtherMISHAWAKA FOUNDATIONTHE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC: $215,000 · OtherTHE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INCTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $124,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYMisericordia: $120,000 · OtherMisericordiaTHE SALVATION ARMY: $119,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYAMERICAN RED CROSS: $94,000 · OtherLURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $83,000 · OtherEVANSTON ART CENTER: $75,000 · Other+44 more: $815,967 · Other+44 moreRheumatology Research Foundation: $265,000 · HealthRheumatology …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $141,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILD…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Health+1 more: $10,000 · HealthGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $330,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CH…CAMP MISHAWAKA: $250,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP MISH…ONEGOAL: $46,000 · Youth DevelopmentONEGOAL+1 more: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentWestern Sports Foundation: $80,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $35,000 · Human ServicesInspiration Corporation: $22,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY FOCUS LEGACY: $14,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $114,000 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF THE ROBERT CROWN CENTER: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $65,000 · PhilanthropyYELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $35,000 · PhilanthropyBEARS CARE: $33,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,110,967Health$436,000Food & Nutrition$330,000Youth Development$297,000Human Services$151,500Recreation & Sports$134,000Philanthropy$133,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $330,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRheumatology Research Foundation: $265,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCAMP MISHAWAKA: $250,000 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetTHE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC: $215,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $141,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $124,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $114,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWestern Sports Foundation: $80,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetEVANSTON ART CENTER: $75,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetZOO & AQUARIUM VIDEO ARCHIVE: $50,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetONEGOAL: $46,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHEPHZIBAH CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $36,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBEARS CARE: $33,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $32,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetInspiration Corporation: $22,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ROBERT CROWN CENTER: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEVANSTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 202 ED FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetIONA UNIVERSITY: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY FOCUS LEGACY: $14,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTRIO ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $9,542 over 2y, 0.0% of budget1916 REDAN FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADING POWER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF JONES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFLINT CREEK WILDLIFE REHABILITATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds Rheumatology Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CAMP MISHAWAKA ↗
  • Who funds THE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Western Sports Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EVANSTON ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds ZOO & AQUARIUM VIDEO ARCHIVE ↗
  • Who funds ONEGOAL ↗
  • Who funds HEPHZIBAH CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEARS CARE ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Inspiration Corporation ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ROBERT CROWN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EVANSTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 202 ED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IONA UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL20.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Patrick G and Shirley W Ryan Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clayton a Struve Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clayton a Struve Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Clayton a Struve Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph