Skip to content
Clark Pacific Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Clark Pacific Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$236k
Granted FY2024still arriving
51
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$341kReligion$178kYouth Development$75kEnvironment$70kHuman Services$58kRecreation & Sports$51kFood & Nutrition$50kHealth$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k45 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $99k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR LAND-BASED LEARNING$65,000
YOUTH OF CHRIST SACRAMENTO$41,792
NORTH VALLEY BASEBALL JENSEN$19,944
SACRAMENTO PHILHARMONIC AND OPERA$15,000
YOLO CRISIS NURSERY$11,881
ENGINEERING MINISTRIES INERNATIONAL INC$10,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$5,000
YOLO FOOD BANK$4,600
MEALS ON WHEELS YOLO COUNTY$4,500
CIE FOUNDATION$3,500
FRIENDS OF CLARKSBURG SERVICES AND RECREATION$3,000
GREEN BRIDGE CHRISTIAN LEARNING$2,957
DCCNS$2,750
ROB MAXEY EDUCATION FUND$2,500
WOODLAND SUNRISE ROTARY FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FACING HOMELESSNESS: $1k → 9%CALIFORNIA HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $500 → 12%HOPE CENTERS UNITED: $2k → 12%KIDS HELPING KIDS SACRAMENTO: $1k → 12%YOLO CRISIS NURSERY: $10k → 16%YOLO CRISIS NURSERY INC: $8k → 16%SACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME: $8k → 12%THE YMCA OF SUPERIOR CALIFORNIA: $3k → 12%YMCA OF SUPERIOR CALIFORNIA: $2k → 12%FRIENDS OF MEALS ON WHEELS: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$773k · 46 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
65

Total granted

$773k
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+25%

Still filing today

70%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION AT SACRAMENTO STATE
    3× · 2018–2021 · $185k · revenue +119%
  • YF
    YOUTH FOR CHRIST SACRAMENTO
    5× · 2020–2024 · $176k · revenue +9%
  • PF
    PCI FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2023 · $78k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • YF
    YOUTH FOR CHRIST MINISTRIES SACRAMENTO
    one grant, 2019 · $24k
  • SC
    SACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOMEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +29%
  • R
    RISE
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sbds Sports Academy Sacramento
Recreation & Sports
2
So Cal Aces Baseball Club

Youth sports

Religion
3
Cencal Youth Sports

To promote hard work, integrity, and trust to the youth of central california through our sports and fitness programs.

Education
4
California Storm of Sacramento

Our mission is to inspire and empower girls by building self-confidence and leadership skills through the game of soccer.

Recreation & Sports
5
Santa Barbara Soccer Club

Provides youth soccer development and amateur athletic competition through coaching, training and competition.

Recreation & Sports
6
Southwest Riverside County Youth Sports Coalition Corp

It is the mission of srcysc to provide the youth of riverside county with equal opportunities for those of all genders and ages to engage and take active part in personal fitness, teamwork, athletic competition and self esteem building…

Recreation & Sports
7
Solano United Soccer Club

Promote, develop, and administer the sport of soccer amongst the youth of Solano County, CA.

Recreation & Sports
8
Tahoe Youth Sports Development
Recreation & Sports
9
Union Sacramento Fc

The organization promotes the development of youth soccer players in the sacramento area by forming teams of talented players who can compete at the highest levels of youth soccer. the organization helps provide the highest quality coaches…

Recreation & Sports
10
Sacramento Pioneer Association
Arts & Culture
11
Turlock Education Opportunity Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
12
California School-Age Consortium Inc

The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way California Capital Region; the most unlike its peers is Square Root Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
77/81
Grantees still filing
57/81
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUTH FOR CHRIST SACRAMENTO: $175,619 · OtherYOUTH FOR CHRIST SACRAMENTOYOUTH FOR CHRIST MINISTRIES SACRAMENTO: $23,778 · OtherYOUTH FOR CHRIST MINISTRIES SACRAMENTONORTH VALLEY BASEBALL JENSEN: $21,044 · OtherCAMPUS LIFE CONNECTION: $22,888 · OtherAmerican Heart Association Inc: $19,000 · Other+102 more: $181,074 · Other+102 moreTHE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION AT SACRAMENTO STATE: $185,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION …Poppy Preschool Davis fka DCCNS: $7,750 · Education+11 more: $29,650 · Education+11 morePCI FOUNDATION: $77,500 · Community ImprovementPCI FOUND…FRIENDS OF CLARKSBURG SERVICES AND RECREATION: $3,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $2,750 · Community ImprovementCenter for Land-Based Learning: $68,000 · Environment+1 more: $1,500 · EnvironmentYolo Crisis Nursery: $42,397 · Human ServicesSACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME: $8,000 · Human ServicesYoung Mens Christian Association of Superior California: $4,500 · Human ServicesHope Centers United: $2,000 · Human Services+4 more: $3,030 · Human ServicesWoodlands Dinner on Main: $34,500 · Food & NutritionYOLO FOOD BANK: $9,600 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS YOLO COUNTY: $4,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $500 · Food & NutritionSACRAMENTO PHILHARMONIC & OPERA FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SUTTER CLUB FOUNDATION: $10,200 · Arts & CultureMOSAIC - WCM: $4,000 · Arts & CultureDavis Media Access: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$443,403Education$222,400Community Improvement$83,250Environment$69,500Human Services$59,927Food & Nutrition$49,100Arts & Culture$31,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION AT SACRAMENTO STATE: $185,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetYOUTH FOR CHRIST SACRAMENTO: $175,619 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetPCI FOUNDATION: $77,500 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetCenter for Land-Based Learning: $68,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetYolo Crisis Nursery: $42,397 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWoodlands Dinner on Main: $34,500 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetCAMPUS LIFE CONNECTION: $22,888 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSACRAMENTO PHILHARMONIC & OPERA FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE SUTTER CLUB FOUNDATION: $10,200 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetYOLO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL USA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOLO FOOD BANK: $9,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPoppy Preschool Davis fka DCCNS: $7,750 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetFuture Foundation of Sacramento Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTICKET TO DREAM FOUNDATION: $5,001 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Placer County: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY CALIFORNIA CAPITAL REGION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA GOLDEN EMPIRE COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSpero: $4,750 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS YOLO COUNTY: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRedlands Community Scholarship Foundation: $4,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association of Superior California: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWOODLAND UNITED WAY: $3,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPregnancy Support Group of Woodland Inc Crisis Pregnancy Hotline: $3,250 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF CLARKSBURG SERVICES AND RECREATION: $3,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWest Sacramento Soccer Club: $2,750 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetCristo Rey High School Sacramento: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOODLAND SUNRISE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetADELANTO COMMUNITY BENEFIT CORPORATION: $2,500 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetDavis Media Access: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWOODLAND LITTLE LEAGUE: $2,350 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL LEADERS MUST SERVE: $2,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHope Centers United: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONOVAN CREASON MEMORIAL TRUST FUND: $1,800 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetVictor Valley College Foundation: $1,668 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN YOUTH SOCCER ORGANIZATION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOODLAND RECREATION FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYOLO LAND TRUST: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC: $1,400 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CLARKSBURG LIBRARY: $1,250 over 1y, 3.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacramento Region Com…Teichert FoundationKelly FoundationSutter Valley Hospita…Yolo Community Founda…Mariani Nut Company F…Sierra Health Foundat…Sierra Health Foundat…Regnar & Beverly Paul…Kaiser Foundation Hos…California Foundation…The Irma Ceunis and S…
Sacramento Region Community FoundationCA47.9× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Teichert Foundation · Kelly Foundation · Sutter Valley Hospitals · Yolo Community Foundation · Mariani Nut Company Foundation Inc · Sierra Health Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Regnar & Beverly Paulsen Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · The Irma Ceunis and Simone C Wynant Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clark Pacific Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clark Pacific Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 142 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Clark Pacific’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home