· Private foundation
Mariani Nut Company Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k72 grants · $100k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONSERVATIVE PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| HEALTHY FAMILY PROJECT INC | $10,000 |
| AG WEST FARM CREDIT | $7,988 |
| FRIENDS OF WINTERS FFA | $7,500 |
| FATEH SPORTS CLUB | $5,000 |
| YOLO CRISIS NURSERY | $5,000 |
| YOLO COUNTY FOOD BANK | $4,000 |
| WINTERS HIGH SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| WINTERS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| SEAN M WALSK K-9 MEMORIAL FOUNDATIO | $2,500 |
| YOLO LAND TRUST | $2,500 |
| WINTERS COMMUNITY CORAZON | $2,500 |
| CITY OF WINTERS FIRE DEPT | $2,000 |
| ST ANTHONY PARISH | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
111 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2025, 71 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WHWINTERS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC3× · 2020–2025 · $103k · revenue +60%
- WLWINTERS LITTLE LEAGUE8× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +107%
- YLYOLO LAND TRUST8× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +60%
Funded once
- NHNEW HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONone grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue +7%
- CSCOSTCO SCHOLARSHIP FUNDone grant, 2022 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of yolo food bank is to make yolo county a thriving community where everyone has the resources they need to experience health, prosperity, and a high quality of life. Yolo Food bank durably increases food and nutrition security…
To increase awareness and understanding of agriculture among california educators and students.
Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…
To enhance the ability of the Yolo County Library to provide library services to its widespread and diverse population by supporting reading programs and its 7 branch libraries. Our current funding priorities are 1)early literacy so…
Work together to improve the lives of children, youth, and families in our communities.the childrens alliance is an inter-agency collaborative, which coordinates needed family support services,convenes child and family advocates to solve…
To engage in and support public education and research to protect and enhance Californias agricultural infrastructure and natural resources.
To educate the youth in Sacramento County about the importance of hands-on agriculture.
Bear Yuba Land Trust exists to conserve and protect the natural, working, and cultural lands in the Bear and Yuba River watersheds and empower a healthy, resilient community through nature access and education.
To promote the well being of older adults in Yolo County through education, collaboration and advocacy.
FoodLink is committed to ending hunger by providing healthy food and nutrition education to those in need through community involvement.
To promote hard work, integrity, and trust to the youth of central california through our sports and fitness programs.
To provide education and assistance to the general public on the planting and preservation of trees in the urban environment and the creating of trails and green belts.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Clara Police Activities League Inc and the most unlike its peers is University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 271 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WINTERS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WINTERS LITTLE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds YOLO LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds Yolo Crisis Nursery ↗
- Who funds FOOD LITERACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Conservative Partnership Institute ↗
- Who funds WINTERS PARENT NURSERY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds YOLO COUNTY FARM BUREAU ↗
- Who funds YOLO HOSPICE INC ↗
- Who funds Winters Senior Foundation ↗
- Who funds Santa Clara Police Activities League Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Robert & Margaret McNamara Foundation · Yolo Community Foundation · Clark Pacific Foundation · Teichert Foundation · Sutter Valley Hospitals · Kelly Foundation · Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mariani Nut Company Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.