· Private foundation
Clark Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k48 grants · $142k
- $10k–50k59 grants · $1.0M
- $50k–250k7 grants · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST MARY'S ACADEMY | $150,000 |
| PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUND | $100,000 |
| OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIV FOUNDA | $50,000 |
| OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| DRESS FOR SUCCESS | $50,000 |
| ST ANDREWS NATIVITY SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND | $50,000 |
| PORTLAND ART MUSEUM | $40,000 |
| DE LA SALLE NORTH CATHOLIC HIGH | $34,200 |
| OUR JUST FUTURE | $30,000 |
| BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY | $25,000 |
| OREGON COAST AQUARIUM | $25,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS | $25,000 |
| LIVING DESERET | $25,000 |
| MUSIC WORKSHOP | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $815k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
131 repeat relationships — 78 still active in FY2024, 53 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EHEDISON HIGH SCHOOL6× · 2017–2023 · $510k · revenue +28%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND8× · 2017–2024 · $490k · revenue +7%
Oregon State University Foundation8× · 2017–2024 · $400k · revenue +42%
Funded once
Friends of Hopewell House dba Hopewell Housegraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +170%- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $20k
GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +86%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Building brighter futures with children and families.
Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…
Fact oregon empowers families, youth, and communities to navigate disability systems, advocating together for disability justice and policy change so that people with disabilities have what they need to thrive at home, in school, and in…
To help empower african americans and others achieve equality in education, employment, and economic security.
Advocate for policies that protect and promote healthy and health equity for all people in oregon and provide learning, collaboration and leadership opportunities for public health professionals and the broader community.
The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…
Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.
To inspire and partner to create quality and equity in individual and community health.
Open signal's mission is to nurture the change-making power of community media in service of a just and equitable world.
Friends - portland commits to standing alongside our community's youth as they work to overcome barriers to their success. each child receives 1:1 support and guidance from a salaried, professional mentor (called a friend), from…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeworks Nw and the most unlike its peers is Linton Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
130 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 130 of the 212 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EDISON HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF GREATER PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF OREGON & SW WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds HUMAN SOLUTIONS INC DBA OUR JUST FUTURE ↗
- Who funds DOVE LEWIS EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds ST ANDREW LEGAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Dress for Success Oregon ↗
- Who funds OREGON SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ZENGER FARM ↗
- Who funds OREGON COAST AQUARIUM INC ↗
- Who funds Full Circle Programs ↗
- Who funds Music Workshop ↗
- Who funds OREGON BALLET THEATRE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Juan Young Trust · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Autzen Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Jackson Foundation · The Reser Family Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Collins Foundation · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Clark Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Morrison Child and Family Services — 91% of income from government
- Community Action Organization — 67% of income from government
- Janus Youth Programs Inc — 46% of income from government
- Kindred Partners — 42% of income from government
- Portland YouthBuilders — 35% of income from government
- Clackamas Women's Services — 33% of income from government
- Portland Street Medicine — 32% of income from government
- Adelante Mujeres — 31% of income from government
- Partners for a Hunger Free Oregon — 31% of income from government
- Transition Projects Inc — 29% of income from government
- Heart of Oregon Corps Inc — 28% of income from government
- Friends of Zenger Farm — 28% of income from government
- Oregon Coast Aquarium Inc — 24% of income from government
- Community Partners for Affordable Housing — 22% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Human Solutions Inc Dba Our Just Future — 17% of income from government
- Project Lemonade Inc — 15% of income from government
- Ywca of Greater Portland — 15% of income from government
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
- Cascade Aids Project — 13% of income from government
- High Desert Museum — 11% of income from government
- My Voice Music Inc — 11% of income from government
- Oregon Historical Society — 10% of income from government
- Raphael House of Portland — 10% of income from government
- Music Workshop — 10% of income from government
- Hollywood Senior Center dba Community for Positive Aging — 9% of income from government
- Lifeworks Nw — 8% of income from government
- Impact Nw — 8% of income from government
- The Shadow Project — 8% of income from government
- Community Transitional School — 7% of income from government
- Girl Scouts of Oregon & Sw Washington Inc — 5% of income from government
- Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest — 4% of income from government
- The Boys & Girls Aid Society of Oregon — 3% of income from government
- Smart Reading — 3% of income from government
- Chamber Music Northwest — 3% of income from government
- Friendly House Inc — 3% of income from government
- St Andrew Legal Clinic — 2% of income from government
- Casa for Children Inc — 2% of income from government
- High Desert Chamber Music Inc — 1% of income from government
- University of Portland — 1% of income from government
- Sarah Bellums Bakery & Workshop — 1% of income from government
- Northwest Housing Alternatives — 1% of income from government
- Portland Art Museum — 1% of income from government
- Portland Center Stage — 1% of income from government
- Broadway Rose Theatre Co — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Public Broadcasting — 1% of income from government
- Portland Jazz Festival Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- William Temple House — 0% of income from government
- Bird Alliance of Oregon Inc — 0% of income from government
- Beaverton Arts Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Ballet Theatre — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Symphony Association — 0% of income from government
- Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Clark Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Clark Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.