Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Christus-Trinity Mother Frances Foundation

CHRISTUS-TRINITY MOTHER FRANCES FOUNDATION has as its primary mission to receive funds for the benefit of mother frances regional hospital health care center.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$939k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$17MEducation$754kReligion$650kHuman Services$640kRecreation & Sports$360kSocial Science$328kPhilanthropy$168kCrime & Legal$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k6 grants · $649k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.9M
$125,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$109M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTUS TRINITY MOTHER FRANCES HOSPITAL$939,032
CHAMPION EMS$473,828
SISTERS OF THE HOLY FAMILY OF NAZARETH USA$450,000
CHRISTUS GOOD SHEPHERD HEALTH SYSTEM$175,000
OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE CATHOLIC CHURCH$125,000
GRACE COMMUNITY SCHOOL ACADEMIC SERVICES CENTER$100,000
HEARTISANS MARKETPLACE$100,000
CHRISTUS TRINITY CLINIC$99,204
ANGEL LAYETTES$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $228k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOOD COUNTY CHILD PROTECTION BOARD: $52k → 13%THE FOSTERING COLLECTIVE: $176k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18M · 11 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
23

Total granted

$18M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+6%

Still filing today

64%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $650k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    Mother Frances Hospital Regional Health Care Center
    7× · 2017–2025 · $15M · revenue +132%
  • CT
    CHRISTUS TRINITY CLINIC TEXAS
    6× · 2017–2025 · $595k · revenue +585%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES- DIOCESE OF TYLER
    2× · 2020–2023 · $260k · revenue +25% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    one grant, 2022 · $212k
  • TJ
    TYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $196k · revenue +66%
  • ET
    EAST TEXAS ORPHAN CARE NETWORK INC DBA THE FOSTERING COLLECTIVE
    one grant, 2024 · $176k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grace Community Healthcare Ministry

Grace community healthcare ministry is an independent, faith based non-profit community healthcare organization in mineola, texas, serving the medically underserved residents of the area. following the example of the great physician, the…

Health
2
Christus Good Shepherd Medical Center

To serve the community with respect to providing healthcare services and healthcare education regardless of race, sex, creed, national origin, handicap, age or ability to pay.

Health
3
Christus Health Foundation of Southeast Texas

Christus health foundation of southeast texas serves the philanthropic needs of christus health southeast texas by soliciting and distributing contributions in support of christus health southeast texas.

—
4
ContinueCare Hospital of Tyler Inc

It is the mission of longview continuecare hospital and continuecare hospital of tyler, inc. to enhance community health through service with compassion, care, accountability, respect and empathy.

Health
5
Christus Northeast Texas and Northern Louisiana Health System Corporation

Coordinating parent of charitable healthcare system guiding activities of affiliated entities to provide quality healthcare services to the community.

Religion
6
The Hospice at the Texas Medical Center

The Hospice at the Texas Medical Center holds a freestanding 37 bed inpatient facility in the Texas Medical Center that is operated and managed by Houston Hospice.

Human Services
7
Christ's Hospital
—
8
Christus Health Ark-La-Tex

Support the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the healing ministry of jesus christ in conformity with the roman catholic church.

Health
9
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
10
Christus Health

Supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the healing ministry of jesus christ in conformity with the roman catholic church.

Health
11
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
12
Marshall Health Services Inc

Marshall health services inc (mhs) is organized and operated to provide an integrated health care delivery system that provides quality health care to marshall, tx and the surrounding communities. it provides health care to the public…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christus St Michael Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Mineola Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%7%<5yr13%7%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr14%7%35–55yr16%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%1%<5yr13%2%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr17%8%20–35yr14%1%35–55yr16%86%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
12%
319/2,602

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Mother Frances Hospital Regional Health Care Center — $14,594,547 · HealthMother Frances Hospital Regional Health Care CenterCHRISTUS TRINITY CLINIC TEXAS — $594,730 · HealthCHAMPION EMS — $565,348 · Health+6 more — $622,462 · HealthCATHOLIC CHURCH EXTENSION SOCIETY OF US OF AMER — $503,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHURCH …SISTERS OF THE HOLY FAMILY OF NAZARETH — $450,000 · OtherSISTERS OF THE H…GOOD SHEPHERD HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $375,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD HE…DIOCESE OF TYLER — $325,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF TYLERST GREGORY CATHEDRAL — $275,000 · OtherST GREGORY CATHE…CATHOLIC CHARITIES — $211,945 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITI…CATHEDRAL OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION TYLER — $171,000 · OtherCATHEDRAL OF THE…HOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS — $165,862 · OtherHOSPICE OF EAST …+9 more — $555,000 · Other+9 moreTYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $196,000 · EducationCULTURE OF LIFE FOUNDATION — $89,000 · EducationPROMISE ACADEMY INC — $86,000 · EducationPROMISE ACADEMY — $83,000 · EducationCATHOLIC CHARITIES- DIOCESE OF TYLER — $259,540 · PhilanthropyMercy Ships Foundation — $35,000 · PhilanthropyEAST TEXAS ORPHAN CARE NETWORK INC DBA THE FOSTERING COLLECTIVE — $175,910 · Human ServicesWOOD COUNTY CHILD PROTECTION BOARD — $51,928 · Human ServicesTyler Achievement Center for Kids Starbrite Therapeutic Equestrian Center — $144,220 · Recreation & SportsCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF SMITH COUNTY — $100,000 · Crime & LegalHOPE INC — $30,000 · Crime & Legal
Health$16,377,087Other$3,031,807Education$454,000Philanthropy$294,540Human Services$227,838Recreation & Sports$144,220Crime & Legal$130,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMother Frances Hospital Regional Health Care Center — $14,594,547 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetCHRISTUS TRINITY CLINIC TEXAS — $594,730 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPION EMS — $565,348 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES- DIOCESE OF TYLER — $259,540 over 2y, 27% of budgetTYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $196,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetEAST TEXAS ORPHAN CARE NETWORK INC DBA THE FOSTERING COLLECTIVE — $175,910 over 1y, 16% of budgetHOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS — $165,862 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTyler Achievement Center for Kids Starbrite Therapeutic Equestrian Center — $144,220 over 1y, 19% of budgetANGEL LAYETTES — $137,000 over 3y, 46% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC — $135,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTEXAS PALLIATIVE CARE — $133,550 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF SMITH COUNTY — $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHEARTISANS MARKETPLACE — $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetMOSAIC COUNSELING CENTERS OF EAST TEXAS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetTEXAS RAMP PROJECT — $100,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetCULTURE OF LIFE FOUNDATION — $89,000 over 1y, 71% of budgetPROMISE ACADEMY INC — $86,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPROMISE ACADEMY — $83,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetEAST TEXAS ALZHEIMER'S ALLIANCE — $71,912 over 1y, 66% of budgetWOOD COUNTY CHILD PROTECTION BOARD — $51,928 over 1y, 56% of budgetMercy Ships Foundation — $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHRISTUS St Michael Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Texas Communitie…Mother Frances Hospit…A S Genecov FoundationWomens Fund of Smith …Riter Family Foundati…Ben and Maytee Fisch …Christus HealthCommunities Foundatio…National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…
East Texas Communities FoundationTX27.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Texas Communities Foundation · Mother Frances Hospital Regional Health Care Center · A S Genecov Foundation · Womens Fund of Smith County · Riter Family Foundation · Ben and Maytee Fisch Foundation · Christus Health · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Christus-Trinity Mother Frances Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines