Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ben and Maytee Fisch Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
114
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$2.9MHuman Services$2.5MEducation$1.5MFood & Nutrition$931kCrime & Legal$858kHousing & Shelter$736kArts & Culture$653kPhilanthropy$626kOther$0
02FY2024 · 114 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 114 grants below total $3,240,650 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,673,404 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $432,754 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $81k
  • $10k–50k83 grants · $1.9M
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.3M
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$76M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Andrews Center Treatment & Learning Center$200,000
Mosaic Counseling Center of East Texas, Inc.$200,000
PATH - People Attempting To Help$110,000
East Texas Food Bank$100,000
Children's Advocacy Center of Smith County$95,000
Smith County Champions for Children, Inc.$70,000
Bethesda Health Clinic$65,000
American Red Cross East Texas Chapter$60,000
Habitat for Humanity of Smith County$60,000
United Way of Smith County$55,000
Smith County Clubhouse$55,000
The Arc of Smith County$50,000
Meals on Wheels East Texas$50,000
Northeast Texas Habitat for Humanity, Inc. Serving Gregg, Harrison and Upshur Counties$50,000
Kingdom Life Academy$50,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 124 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

124 repeat relationships — 89 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

124
72

Total granted

$11M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+14%

Still filing today

52%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $327k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF SMITH COUNTY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $410k · revenue +4%
  • SC
    SMITH COUNTY CHAMPIONS FOR CHILDREN INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $358k · revenue +168%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS
    3× · 2018–2022 · $275k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • ML
    Miracle League of Tyler
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue -7%
  • WO
    WOMEN ON THE ROCK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +27% · 26% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
2
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
3
Eastland County Crisis Center Inc

To provide services designed to meet the physical, social, and emotional needs of domestic violence and sexual assault victims by providing for immediate, short, and long-term needs.

Human Services
4
Central Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Pregnancy counseling

Human Services
5
Hope of South Texas Inc

To provide the highest quality of appropriate investigative, assessment, and ongoing thrapeutic treatment services for abused chilren and their families throught the four county service area (victoria, jackson, goliad, and dewitt).

6
Texas Clean Energy Coalition
7
Texas Inmate Families Association

Our mission is to break the cycle of crime by strengthening families through support, education, and advocacy.

8
Good News Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
9
Veterans Center of North Texas Inc

To assist Veterans of all ages & service era & their families navigate through the network of public & private agencies to obtain assistance service & support to establish & maintain productive lifestyles within the North Texas communities.

Health
10
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

11
Northeast Texas Casa Inc

To work to ensure children receive the needed services to overcome abuse and neglect.

Civil Rights
12
Wise County Domestic Violence Task Force

To assist sexual assault and domestic violence victims. To operate a safe shelter and provide counseling services.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Empowerment Community Development Corporation and the most unlike its peers is East Texas Arboretum and Botanical Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Christian Youth CampsJewish Community FederationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterYouth Development CentersDevelopmental Disabilities …Faith-Based Senior LivingCommunity Hospital SystemsChildhood Cancer SupportFood Pantries and AssistanceCharter and Independent Sch…Youth Sports ProgramsVeteran Support ServicesLocal History MuseumsClassical Music OrchestrasDomestic Violence and Sexua…Environmental Advocacy and …Public Library SupportWomen's Empowerment Organiz…Senior Support ServicesCollege Foundation SupportCommunity Literacy TutoringAddiction & Mental Health T…Hospice and Palliative CareAffordable Housing Construc…Community FoundationsUnited Way Affiliates
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%4%<5yr16%7%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr10%31%35–55yr13%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%10%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr10%34%35–55yr13%13%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/106
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,698

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

101 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 101 of the 220 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
99/101
Grantees still filing
65/101
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

East Texas Food Bank — $525,000 · OtherEast Texas Food BankMosaic Counseling Center of East Texas, Inc. — $322,500 · OtherPATH - People Attempting To Help — $310,000 · Other+147 more — $8,014,671 · Other+147 moreNORTHEAST TEXAS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $155,000 · Human ServicesNORTHEAST…ST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $120,000 · Human ServicesST PAUL C…CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF VAN ZANDT COUNTY INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS…RAHABS RETREAT AND RANCH INC — $80,000 · Human ServicesRAHABS RE…EAST TEXAS HUMAN NEEDS NETWORK — $75,000 · Human ServicesEAST TEXA…PATH - PEOPLE ATTEMPTING TO HELP — $75,000 · Human ServicesPATH - PE…GATEWAY COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $65,000 · Human ServicesGATEWAY C…CRISIS CENTER OF ANDERSON & CHEROKEE CO — $60,000 · Human ServicesCRISIS CE…WOMENS CENTER OF EAST TEXAS INC — $60,000 · Human ServicesWOMENS CE…EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesDomestic Violence Prevention Inc — $50,000 · Human Services+10 more — $202,500 · Human Services+10 moreSMITH COUNTY CLUBHOUSE — $159,500 · HealthBETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC — $157,500 · HealthTyler Type 1 Diabetes Foundation — $126,406 · HealthNEXT STEP COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS — $117,164 · HealthKOURAGE HEALTH INC — $115,000 · HealthNEW CREATION FOUNDATION INC — $99,065 · HealthHOSPICE OF TEXARKANA — $85,000 · HealthHOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS FOUNDATION — $75,000 · HealthChildren are a Gift Foundation — $40,000 · HealthGOLD NETWORK OF EAST TEXAS — $35,000 · Health+1 more — $30,000 · HealthSMITH COUNTY CHAMPIONS FOR CHILDREN INC — $358,000 · EducationLITERACY COUNCIL OF TYLER DBA PAVE EAST TEXAS — $120,000 · EducationPROMISE ACADEMY — $71,211 · EducationICEE Success Foundation — $64,932 · EducationTYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $60,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF EAST TEXAS — $32,000 · EducationUNITED WAY OF SMITH COUNTY — $235,666 · PhilanthropyGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $105,000 · PhilanthropyWOMENS FUND OF SMITH COUNTY — $80,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHEAST TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $32,000 · PhilanthropyCATHOLIC CHARITIES- DIOCESE OF TYLER — $30,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $30,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF SMITH COUNTY — $409,967 · Crime & LegalTAPKARD INC — $72,000 · Crime & LegalHOPE INC — $25,000 · Crime & LegalHabitat for Humanity of Smith County — $160,000 · Housing & ShelterTEXAS RAMP PROJECT — $135,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$9,172,171Human Services$1,082,500Health$1,039,635Education$706,143Philanthropy$522,666Crime & Legal$506,967Housing & Shelter$295,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF SMITH COUNTY — $409,967 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetSMITH COUNTY CHAMPIONS FOR CHILDREN INC — $358,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetHOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS — $275,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SMITH COUNTY — $235,666 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetEAST TEXAS VETERANS COMMUNITY COUNCIL CAMP V — $200,000 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetALZHEIMERS ALLIANCE OF NORTHEAST TEXAS dba ALZHEIMERS ALLIANCE OF SMITH COUNTY — $172,330 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Smith County — $160,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetSMITH COUNTY CLUBHOUSE — $159,500 over 3y, 62% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC — $157,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetNORTHEAST TEXAS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $155,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetCASA FOR KIDS OF EAST TEXAS INC — $147,500 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS — $140,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTEXAS RAMP PROJECT — $135,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetTyler Type 1 Diabetes Foundation — $126,406 over 5y, 45% of budgetST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $120,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetLITERACY COUNCIL OF TYLER DBA PAVE EAST TEXAS — $120,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNEXT STEP COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS — $117,164 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetKOURAGE HEALTH INC — $115,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetKINGS STOREHOUSE FOOD BANK INC — $111,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetDISCOVERY PLACE INC DBA THE DISCOVERY SCIENCE PLACE INC — $106,000 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $105,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST TEXAS CARES RESOURCE CENTER — $105,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetCAMP TYLER FOUNDATION — $104,260 over 3y, 12% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS — $100,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNEW CREATION FOUNDATION INC — $99,065 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetCASA OF TRINITY VALLEY INC — $92,500 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetEMPOWERMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $90,000 over 4y, 43% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF VAN ZANDT COUNTY INC — $90,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetHOSPICE OF TEXARKANA — $85,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHRISTUS-TRINITY MOTHER FRANCES FOUNDATION — $80,024 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetRAHABS RETREAT AND RANCH INC — $80,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetWOMENS FUND OF SMITH COUNTY — $80,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetTHE THERAPET ANIMAL ASSISTED THERAPY FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetWOMEN ON THE ROCK INC — $75,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetEAST TEXAS HUMAN NEEDS NETWORK — $75,000 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetPATH - PEOPLE ATTEMPTING TO HELP — $75,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTAPKARD INC — $72,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetPROMISE ACADEMY — $71,211 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetCENIKOR FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS MINISTRY INC — $67,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGATEWAY COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $65,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetICEE Success Foundation — $64,932 over 3y, 50% of budgetCRISIS CENTER OF ANDERSON & CHEROKEE CO — $60,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWOMENS CENTER OF EAST TEXAS INC — $60,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetKINGDOM LIFE ACADEMY — $56,375 over 1y, 20% of budgetHENDERSON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY — $50,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF SMITH COUNTY
  • Who funds SMITH COUNTY CHAMPIONS FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SMITH COUNTY
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS VETERANS COMMUNITY COUNCIL CAMP V
  • Who funds ALZHEIMERS ALLIANCE OF NORTHEAST TEXAS dba ALZHEIMERS ALLIANCE OF SMITH COUNTY
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Smith County
  • Who funds SMITH COUNTY CLUBHOUSE
  • Who funds BETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC
  • Who funds NORTHEAST TEXAS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC
  • Who funds CASA FOR KIDS OF EAST TEXAS INC
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS
  • Who funds TEXAS RAMP PROJECT
  • Who funds Tyler Type 1 Diabetes Foundation
  • Who funds ST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LITERACY COUNCIL OF TYLER DBA PAVE EAST TEXAS
  • Who funds NEXT STEP COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS
  • Who funds KOURAGE HEALTH INC
  • Who funds KINGS STOREHOUSE FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds DISCOVERY PLACE INC DBA THE DISCOVERY SCIENCE PLACE INC
  • Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS CARES RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds CAMP TYLER FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Texas Communities FoundationTX94.2× affinity46 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Texas Communities Foundation · The Rogers Foundation · The Louis and Peaches Owen Family Foundation · A S Genecov Foundation · Hibbs Family Foundation · James I Perkins Family Foundation · Byers Family Foundation · Riter Family Foundation · The Junior League of Tyler Inc · Etx Successor System · T B Butler Foundation · Hoeffner Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 220 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph