· Private foundation
A S Genecov Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k70 grants · $201k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $170k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $108k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT TYLER | $57,500 |
| CONGREGATION BETH EL | $50,000 |
| TYLER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT | $32,500 |
| MOSAIC COUNSELING CENTERS OF EAST TEXAS | $25,000 |
| THE FOSTERING COLLECTIVE | $23,700 |
| MENTORING ALLIANCE | $14,000 |
| ROYAL CARES FOUNDATION LLC | $12,500 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ALLIANCE | $12,500 |
| CHILDREN'S PARK OF TYLER | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - TX HILL COUNTRY | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE TYLER PUBLIC LIBRARY | $10,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $10,000 |
| MAGEN DAVID ADOM | $10,000 |
| BULLARD COMMUNITY LIBRARY | $7,500 |
| HOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $331k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
99 repeat relationships — 67 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TETYLER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC7× · 2019–2025 · $489k · revenue +130%
- MAMENTORING ALLIANCE9× · 2017–2025 · $139k · revenue +287%
- HOHOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS9× · 2017–2025 · $110k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- MLMIRACLE LEAGUE OF TYLERone grant, 2024 · $50k · 45% of their budget
- TMTrinity Mother Frances Foundationone grant, 2018 · $25k
- CFCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF UVALDEone grant, 2022 · $21k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…
The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.
To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.
The texas medical association (tma), the nation's largest and one of the oldest state medical societies, represents over 59,000 physicians and medical students dedicated to enhancing the health of all texans. in collaboration with 110…
As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…
Texas 2036 identifies and advances data-driven policies that will improve lives and expand opportunities for all Texans.
To be the primary source for economic development between Texas and Israel.
To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…
The texas economic development corporation is an independently funded and operated 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization responsible for marketing and promoting texas as a premier business location.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadership Tyler Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nicholas Pet Haven. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 176 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TYLER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum ↗
- Who funds MENTORING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds KOURAGE HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY PLACE INC DBA THE DISCOVERY SCIENCE PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds TYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EAST TEXAS ORPHAN CARE NETWORK INC DBA THE FOSTERING COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds MOSAIC COUNSELING CENTERS OF EAST TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE LEAGUE OF TYLER ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds TYLER MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds CASA For Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds TYLER IND SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EAST TEXAS COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds SMITH COUNTY CHAMPIONS FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Literacy Council of Williamson County ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP TYLER INC ↗
- Who funds TYLER DAY NURSERY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds EAST TEXAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: East Texas Communities Foundation · James I Perkins Family Foundation · Ben and Maytee Fisch Foundation · The Rogers Foundation · Hibbs Family Foundation · The Louis and Peaches Owen Family Foundation · Bob L Herd Foundation · Byers Family Foundation · Riter Family Foundation · The Junior League of Tyler Inc · Julietta Jarvis Foundation Inc · Bg Byars Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization A S Genecov Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to A S Genecov Foundation?
Find your warmest path to A S Genecov Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.