How much did CHRISTIAN HERITAGE MINISTRIES grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of CHRISTIAN HERITAGE MINISTRIES’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

kidsministrycamp

2020

associatedhousing

2021

churchoutreach

2022

campbuilding

2023

equipmentbuilding additionpurchasescholarshipsfood

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k5 grants · $25k
$10k–50k10 grants · $159k
$50k–250k1 grant · $50k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$5.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

BIG CANYON RANCH$50,000
FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH$30,000
REDEMPTION CHURCH$25,000
OPEN HAND MINISTRY$20,000
WASHINGTON HEIGHTS CHURCH$15,000
LOVING UTAH$15,000
INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$14,000
SAFE HARBOR$10,000
UTAH PARTNERSHIP FOR CHRIST$10,000
TEEN CHALLENGE$10,000
FIGHT THE NEW DRUG$10,000
HANDS ACROSS BORDERS$8,500
WASATCH ANGLICAN$7,500
PURSUEGOD$4,500
GOOD NEWS PRISON MINISTRY$3,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6% — the area typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.4M · 15 repeat orgs$302k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.4M

$170k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%

+70%

Still filing today

27%

38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $132k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

ReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NP
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST
3× · 2019–2022 · $733k · revenue +241%
SO
STONE OF HOPE YOUTH
2× · 2021–2022 · $22k · revenue +51%
RC
RATIO CHRISTI
2× · 2019–2020 · $8k · revenue +70%

Funded once

FF
FLEXTALK FOR PURSUE GOD PROGRAM
one grant, 2020 · $25k
FT
FLEX TALK
one grant, 2021 · $25k
CP
CLEAN PATHWAYS
one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -1% · 32% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

New Perspective Ministries

New Perspective Ministry is a faith-based Christian non-profit ministry dedicated to empowering families to experience restoration and healing in Christ by equipping church leaders.The mission of New Perspective Ministries arises out of…

Religion

Student Churches

Provide Biblically-based Christian Ministry Services and Leadership Development to University and High School Students.

Religion

Christian Campus Community

Student events, retreats, meals, conferences focused on spiritual development

Religion

Preaching Camp Ministries

To guide pastors and christian ministers toward ever more efficient and faithful preparation and ever more effective and relevant proclamation of the gospel of jesus christ to evangelize unbelievers and preaching of the christian…

Religion

Scott Nute Global Ministries

Christian evangelism

Religion

Come Reason Ministries

Come Reason Ministries seeks to spread convincing Christianity across the globe by stirring the hearts and minds of the lost and the church. Our mission targets three primary efforts: educating the church, engaging the culture, and…

Religion

Noahs Ark Ukraine Mission

Ukraine humanitarian aid

—

Explore God Network

—

Para Peru

Christian ministry in impoverished areas of Peru.

International

Ywam NATIONS2NATIONS

Bible Studies and prayer walking and reaching out to the homeless

Religion

Project New Hope International

Publicly supported evangelical organization focused on community transformation and empowerment of impoverished neighborhoods in South America and around the world. Missionaries work with community leaders assisting them in various mission…

—

Teaching Ministry of the Word of Truth

A training ministry that equips the saints more focusing on preparing leaders and ministers of the word for the work of ministry to the building up of the body of Christ.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ratio Christi Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hands Across Borders. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

13/14

Grantees still filing

9/14

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$760,721Philanthropy$733,029Religion$84,250Human Services$55,000Health$30,000Youth Development$22,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CHRISTIAN HERITAGE MINISTRIES funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CLEAN PATHWAYS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 843721879 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CLEAN PATHWAYS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 32% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Christian Heritage Ministries?

Find your warmest path to Christian Heritage Ministries through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CHRISTIAN HERITAGE MINISTRIES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Christian Heritage Ministries?

More from the funding graph

CHRISTIAN HERITAGE MINISTRIES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Christian Heritage Ministries?

More from the funding graph