Skip to content
Chinese Community Health Care Association at a glance

· Public charity

Chinese Community Health Care Association

To promote social welfare by making health services more accessible to the chinese community.

$200k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$471kFood & Nutrition$451kHuman Services$205kYouth Development$71kRecreation & Sports$20kHousing & Shelter$10k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $187,120, the rows itemized in this filing. The $200,020 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,900 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $115k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
APA FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES$65,000
SELF HELP FOR THE ELDERLY$50,000
COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO$20,000
WOMENS DIVISION CHRISTIAN SERVICE GUM MOON RESIDENCE HALL$20,000
CHINATOWN YMCA$17,120
CHINESE NEWCOMERS SERVICE CENTER$9,000
SAN FRANCISCO LIFE LINE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $718k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%STEPPING STONE: $15k → 10%STEPPING STONE: $8k → 10%STEPPING STONE: $5k → 10%SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $101k → 10%SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $100k → 10%SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $100k → 10%SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $100k → 10%SELF HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $50k → 10%WOMENS DIVISION CHRISTIAN SERVICE GUM MOON RESIDENCE HALL: $23k → 10%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $21k → 10%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $20k → 10%WOMENS DIVISION CHRISTIAN SERVICE GUM MOON RESIDENCE HALL: $20k → 10%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $20k → 10%WOMENS DIVISION CHRISTIAN SERVICE GUM MOON RESIDENCE HALL: $18k → 10%CHINATOWN YMCA: $17k → 10%DONALDINA CAMERON HOUSE: $15k → 10%CHINATOWN YMCA: $14k → 10%CHINATOWN YMCA: $13k → 10%CHINATOWN YMCA: $13k → 10%DONALDINA CAMERON HOUSE: $10k → 10%CHINESE NEWCOMERS SERVICE CENTER: $9k → 10%CHINESE NEWCOMERS SERVICE CENTER: $6k → 10%CHINESE NEWCOMERS SERVICE CENTER: $6k → 10%CHINESE NEWCOMERS SERVICE CENTER: $6k → 10%CHINESE NEWCOMERS SERVICE CENTER: $6k → 10%DONALDINA CAMERON HOUSE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 12 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$1.1M
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+37%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY
    5× · 2018–2024 · $451k · revenue +53%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO
    7× · 2018–2024 · $118k · revenue +28%
  • CY
    COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO
    6× · 2019–2024 · $91k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • D
    DANCE4HEALING
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • CC
    CHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +37%
  • GP
    GRACE PACIFIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATES
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
Family Bridges Inc

We empower individuals, families, and seniors to achieve wellness, stability, and independence through culturally-competent care.

—
3
Asian and Pacific Islander Wellness Center Inc

Our core belief at San Francisco Community Health Center is that everyone deserves to be healthy and needs access to the highest quality health care. Our mission is to transform lives by advancing health, wellness and equality.

Health
4
San Francisco Filipino Cultural Center
Arts & Culture
5
Homeless Childrens Network

To provide direct mental health services, psychotherapy, and counseling to homeless families in San Francisco, CA and in particular to children of such families, to provide referral services for such families and their children to other…

Human Services
6
Asian Pacific Center for Human Development

To advance the well being of the asian american pacific islander community by providing culturally appropriate and integrated medical, behavioral, and related services.

Health
7
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
8
Asian Youth Center

Ayc's mission is to meet the educational and social service needs of low-income, immigrant, at-risk, and adjudicated youth and families of all ethnicities, with a special cultural and linguistic competence with asian americans. by…

Human Services
9
Save Cantonese

Save Cantonese is an international movement that sustains and celebrates Cantonese language and culture. We have three Strategic Aims: a) protect and strengthen educational and research infrastructure for the Cantonese language, b) affirm…

Arts & Culture
10
Asian American Center of Santa Clara

The mission of Asian American Community Center of Santa Clara County (AASC) is to provide health, human, and economic development services to low income families and individuals to enable them to become actively participating citizens in…

Human Services
11
Asian Community Center of Sacramento Valley Inc Dba Acc Senior Services

The asian community center of sacramento valley's mission is to promote the general welfare and enhance the quality of life for our community by identifying, developing, and providing culturally sensitive health and social services for…

Health
12
Wu Yee Children's Services

Wu yee children's services ("wu yee") is a california not-for-profit corporation which primarily provides childcare and family services to low income families in san francisco, california. wu yee's programs operate out of twelve program…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Donaldina Cameron House; the most unlike its peers is Womens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $450,800 · Human ServicesSELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLYYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $117,620 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCOWomens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall: $60,500 · Human ServicesWomens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence HallChinese Newcomers Service Center: $32,000 · Human ServicesDONALDINA CAMERON HOUSE: $29,500 · Human ServicesNORTH AND SOUTH OF MARKET ADULT DAY HEALTH CORPORATION: $27,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $91,250 · OtherCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER O…NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER PHYSICIANS: $80,000 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL OF ASIA…APA FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $65,000 · OtherAPA FAMILY SUPPORT SERVI…DANCE4HEALING: $15,000 · OtherDANCE4HEALINGGRACE PACIFIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATES: $9,149 · Other+1 more: $6,000 · OtherAmerican Heart Association Inc: $69,032 · HealthAmerican Heart Ass…NICOS CHINESE HEALTH COALITION: $67,500 · HealthNICOS CHINESE HEAL…SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $67,055 · HealthSAN FRANCISCO GENE…THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE: $30,000 · EducationCHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$717,920Other$266,399Health$203,587Education$30,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $450,800 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $117,620 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $91,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER PHYSICIANS: $80,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $69,032 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNICOS CHINESE HEALTH COALITION: $67,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $67,055 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAPA FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $65,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWomens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall: $60,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetChinese Newcomers Service Center: $32,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDONALDINA CAMERON HOUSE: $29,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH AND SOUTH OF MARKET ADULT DAY HEALTH CORPORATION: $27,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Asian Pacific FundUnited Way of the Bay…The San Francisco Fou…Robert J Louie Memori…Cathay Bank FoundationJessie Cheng Charitab…San Francisco Associa…Crankstart FoundationSan Francisco Communi…Sutter Bay HospitalsKaiser Foundation Hos…Marin Community Found…
Asian Pacific FundCA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Asian Pacific Fund · United Way of the Bay Area · The San Francisco Foundation · Robert J Louie Memorial Fund · Cathay Bank Foundation · Jessie Cheng Charitable Foundation · San Francisco Association of Realtors Foundation · Crankstart Foundation · San Francisco Community Agencies Responding to Disaster · Sutter Bay Hospitals · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Marin Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chinese Community Health Care Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chinese Community Health Care Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chinese Community Health Care Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home