Skip to content

California · Public charity

Chinese Community Health Care Association

To promote social welfare by making health services more accessible to the chinese community.

$200k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
7
Itemized grants FY2024
6
Organizations funded FY2023
17%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$187k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$65,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 11
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$21M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 17% of the organizations Chinese Community Health Care Association funded were first-time grantees, receiving 18% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving7$187k29%
FY20236$83k17%
FY20228$114k13%
FY202111$209k18%
FY202010$225k10%
FY20196$179k17%
FY20187$196k100%
FY20172$35kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$471kFood & Nutrition$451kHuman Services$205kYouth Development$71kRecreation & Sports$20kHousing & Shelter$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 17 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Chinese Community Health Care Association supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSelf-Help for the Elderly: $450,800 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of San Francisco: $117,620 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Youth Center of San Francisco: $91,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNational Council of Asian Pacific Islander Physicians: $80,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $69,032 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNicos Chinese Health Coalition: $67,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetSan Francisco General Hospital Foundation: $67,055 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetApa Family Support Services: $65,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWomens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall: $60,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetChinese Newcomers Service Center: $32,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetThe University Corporation San Francisco State: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDonaldina Cameron House: $29,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNorth and South of Market Adult Day Health Corporation: $27,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetChinatown Community Development Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 14.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Asian Pacific FundCA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Asian Pacific Fund · United Way of the Bay Area · The San Francisco Foundation · Robert J Louie Memorial Fund · Cathay Bank Foundation · Jessie Cheng Charitable Foundation · San Francisco Association of Realtors Foundation · Crankstart Foundation · San Francisco Community Agencies Responding to Disaster · Sutter Bay Hospitals · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Marin Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Chinese Community Health Care Association with peer funders

About Chinese Community Health Care Association

How much does Chinese Community Health Care Association give?
Chinese Community Health Care Association reported 7 itemized grants totaling $187,120, out of $200,020 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 11 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Chinese Community Health Care Association fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (38%), Food & Nutrition (37%), Human Services (17%).
Who are Chinese Community Health Care Association's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Self-Help for the Elderly ($451k), Young Men's Christian Association of San Francisco ($118k), Community Youth Center of San Francisco ($91k).
Does Chinese Community Health Care Association fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 17% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Chinese Community Health Care Association?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Asian Pacific Fund, United Way of the Bay Area, The San Francisco Foundation.
Where is Chinese Community Health Care Association based?
Chinese Community Health Care Association is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chinese Community Health Care Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph