· Public charity
Chinese Community Health Care Association
To promote social welfare by making health services more accessible to the chinese community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $187,120 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $200,020 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,900 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $115k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| APA FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES | $65,000 |
| SELF HELP FOR THE ELDERLY | $50,000 |
| COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO | $20,000 |
| WOMENS DIVISION CHRISTIAN SERVICE GUM MOON RESIDENCE HALL | $20,000 |
| CHINATOWN YMCA | $17,120 |
| CHINESE NEWCOMERS SERVICE CENTER | $9,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO LIFE LINE | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $718k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY5× · 2018–2024 · $451k · revenue +53%
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO7× · 2018–2024 · $118k · revenue +28%
- CYCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO6× · 2019–2024 · $91k · revenue +101%
Funded once
- DDANCE4HEALINGone grant, 2023 · $15k
- CCCHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +37%
- GPGRACE PACIFIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATESone grant, 2021 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
We empower individuals, families, and seniors to achieve wellness, stability, and independence through culturally-competent care.
Our core belief at San Francisco Community Health Center is that everyone deserves to be healthy and needs access to the highest quality health care. Our mission is to transform lives by advancing health, wellness and equality.
To provide direct mental health services, psychotherapy, and counseling to homeless families in San Francisco, CA and in particular to children of such families, to provide referral services for such families and their children to other…
To advance the well being of the asian american pacific islander community by providing culturally appropriate and integrated medical, behavioral, and related services.
The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…
Ayc's mission is to meet the educational and social service needs of low-income, immigrant, at-risk, and adjudicated youth and families of all ethnicities, with a special cultural and linguistic competence with asian americans. by…
Save Cantonese is an international movement that sustains and celebrates Cantonese language and culture. We have three Strategic Aims: a) protect and strengthen educational and research infrastructure for the Cantonese language, b) affirm…
The mission of Asian American Community Center of Santa Clara County (AASC) is to provide health, human, and economic development services to low income families and individuals to enable them to become actively participating citizens in…
The asian community center of sacramento valley's mission is to promote the general welfare and enhance the quality of life for our community by identifying, developing, and providing culturally sensitive health and social services for…
Wu yee children's services ("wu yee") is a california not-for-profit corporation which primarily provides childcare and family services to low income families in san francisco, california. wu yee's programs operate out of twelve program…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Donaldina Cameron House and the most unlike its peers is Womens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER PHYSICIANS ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds NICOS CHINESE HEALTH COALITION ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds APA FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Womens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall ↗
- Who funds Chinese Newcomers Service Center ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE ↗
- Who funds DONALDINA CAMERON HOUSE ↗
- Who funds NORTH AND SOUTH OF MARKET ADULT DAY HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Asian Pacific Fund · United Way of the Bay Area · The San Francisco Foundation · Robert J Louie Memorial Fund · Cathay Bank Foundation · Jessie Cheng Charitable Foundation · San Francisco Association of Realtors Foundation · Crankstart Foundation · San Francisco Community Agencies Responding to Disaster · Sutter Bay Hospitals · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Marin Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Chinese Community Health Care Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.