· Public charity
Children's Health Care
We champion the health needs of children and families.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $354,800 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $14,569,261 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $14,214,461 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $148k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $193k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| QUEERSPACE COLLECTIVE | $67,500 |
| VIETNAMESE SOCIAL SERVICES OF MN | $62,500 |
| CHILDRENS DENTAL SERVICES | $62,500 |
| GREATER MSP | $40,000 |
| MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| RAE MACKENZIE GROUP INC | $19,000 |
| CHILDRENS MN FOUNDATION | $15,800 |
| STATE OF MINNESOTA | $15,000 |
| HEMOPHILIA FDTN OF MN AND DAKOTAS | $12,000 |
| RONDALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $11,000 |
| WILSONS IMAGE COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP | $10,000 |
| CHILDRENS THEATRE COMPANY | $8,500 |
| CHILDRENS HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $149k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $241k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PHPORTICO HEALTHNET5× · 2017–2022 · $294k · revenue +45%
- CHCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $267k · revenue +2%
- RMRonald McDonald House Charities - Upper Midwest7× · 2017–2024 · $96k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- MWMN Wild Foundationone grant, 2018 · $34k
- PWPhyllis Wheatley Community Center Incone grant, 2023 · $21k · revenue -9%
- MWMINNESOTA WILD FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $16k · revenue +134%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…
Advance the health of individuals and communities through leadership, advocacy and collaboration on behalf of minnesota hospitals and health systems. vision: minnesotans are healthy and have access to the right care at the right time in…
Women's Foundation of Minnesota is a statewide community foundation investing in ending systemic inequities and driving innovation for gender and racial justice. WFM applies an Intersectional Equity Framework inclusive of gender, race,…
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
Glencoe regional health services exists to improve every life by offering high-quality, safe, and accessible healthcare. we are dedicated to strengthening healthcare by connecting our communities, enhancing the patient experience,…
To build and maintain financial support for planned parenthood north central states to advance and protect sexual and reproductive health care for all.
With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Care Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Wilsons Image College Scholarship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PORTICO HEALTHNET ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities - Upper Midwest ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH ↗
- Who funds QUEERSPACE COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds VIETNAMESE SOCIAL SERVICES OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DENTAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds UPPER MIDWEST BLEEDING DISORDERS ALLIANC ↗
- Who funds CONGENITAL HEART SURGEONS' SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MINNEAPOLIS SAINT PAUL REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEARTLINK ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN AMERICAN LEADERSHIP FORUM ↗
- Who funds IRELAND'S HOPE ↗
- Who funds REGIONS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PILLSBURY UNITED COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds ELEVEN FIFTEEN CLUB - WOMEN IN HEALTH CARE LEADERSHIP ↗
- Who funds Phyllis Wheatley Community Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Wilsons Image College Scholarship ↗
- Who funds Gillette Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA WILD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FETAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE LOFT INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds THE QUELL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW HEALTH MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Children's Theatre Company and School ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Allina Health System · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · Women's Foundation of Minnesota · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Medica Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Group Health Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Children's Health Care funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.