Skip to content

· Public charity

Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce

The Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce combines the power of people, with our legacy of leadership and business advocacy, to drive a dynamic economy.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
50
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Employment$4.4MHealth$800kYouth Development$359kScience & Tech$344kFood & Nutrition$155kPublic Safety & Disaster$129kAnimals$66kEducation$56kOther$0
02FY2025 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 50 grants below total $1,131,996, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,208,342 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $76,346 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $166k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $493k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $473k
$12,736
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ford Motor Company$77,361
Vital Proteins$70,000
USIC Locating Services$70,000
Ingredion Inc$69,032
John B Sanfilippo & Son Inc$63,713
Manhattan Mechanical Services$62,763
Chicago Lighthouse$59,640
CARA Collective$49,675
Youth Guidance$49,603
Kids Above All$41,981
Sysmex America Inc$36,705
Novolex$34,557
Brightpoint$31,966
Vapor Bus International$26,323
GSF USA Inc$21,183
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $416k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%North Shore Senior Center: $6k → 14%YMCA of Metro Chicago: $9k → 14%The Chicago Lighthouse for People who are Blind or Visually Impaired: $109k → 14%The Chicago Lighthouse for People who are Blind or: $100k → 14%The Chicago Lighthouse for People who are Blind or: $99k → 14%Chicago Lighthouse: $60k → 14%Brightpoint: $32k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.4M · 63 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

63 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
53

Total granted

$5.4M
$803k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+3%

Still filing today

11%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $271k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthEmploymentFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED
    4× · 2022–2025 · $368k · revenue +20%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $122k · revenue +23%
  • KA
    Kids Above All Illinois
    4× · 2022–2025 · $103k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • A
    ASI
    one grant, 2022 · $81k · revenue +8%
  • FG
    FIS Global
    one grant, 2020 · $64k
  • WM
    WEST MONROE PARTNERS LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $49k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
2
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
3
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
4
Chicago Municipal Employee's Credit Union

To give members the ability to control their financial destiny by providing members with the means to satisfy their needs for financial services in a comfortable family-like environment. in doing so, the credit union strives to maintain…

—
5
Mchc Chicago Hospital Council

The mission of mchc chicago hospital council is to foster, promote, support, develop and encourage charitable, educational, scholastic and scientific purposes; promote cooperative effort and action between hospitals and other health care…

Health
6
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
7
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
8
Sinnissippi Centers Inc

It is the mission of sinnissippi centers, inc. to provide quality, coordinated and responsive behavioral healthcare services to individuals, families and the communities we serve.

Health
9
Illinois Health and Hospital Association

To advocate for and support hospitals and health systems as they serve patients and communities in illinois.

—
10
Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare

Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

Health
11
Ageguide Northeastern Illinois Area On Aging

We strive to make aging easier through the development of a network of services for older persons designed to optimize the quality of their lives.

Food & Nutrition
12
Illinois Manufacturers' Association

To strengthen the economic social environmental and governmental conditions for manufacturing and allied enterprises in the state of illinois, resulting in an englarged business base and increased employment.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Chicago Lighthouse for People Who Are Blind Or Visually Impaired; the most unlike its peers is Illinois Business Innovation Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 133 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Ford Motor Company: $612,145 · OtherFord Motor CompanyNovolex: $414,093 · OtherNovolexJohn B Sanfilippo & Sons Inc: $302,214 · OtherJohn B Sanfilippo & Sons IncManhattan Mechanical Services: $270,551 · OtherG&W Electric Co: $251,157 · Other+116 more: $3,766,853 · Other+116 moreTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $368,081 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL: $31,966 · Human Services+2 more: $15,777 · Human ServicesYouth Guidance: $118,910 · EducationONE MILLION DEGREES: $6,135 · EducationGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $121,997 · Food & NutritionThe Cara Program: $67,518 · EmploymentTHE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 · EmploymentLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $65,560 · AnimalsGateway Foundation Inc: $21,825 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,693 · Health
Other$5,617,013Human Services$415,824Education$125,045Food & Nutrition$121,997Employment$74,018Animals$65,560Health$27,518

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $368,081 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $121,997 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Guidance: $118,910 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKids Above All Illinois: $103,120 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetASI: $80,914 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Cara Program: $67,518 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $65,560 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHoward Brown Health Center: $53,341 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST AUGUSTINE COLLEGE: $34,472 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL: $31,966 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS BUSINESS INNOVATION SERVICES: $31,500 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetCity Colleges of Chicago Foundation: $28,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGateway Foundation Inc: $21,825 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $9,353 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMcDermott Center: $7,192 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $6,424 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE MILLION DEGREES: $6,135 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,693 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds Youth Guidance ↗
  • Who funds Kids Above All Illinois ↗
  • Who funds ASI ↗
  • Who funds The Cara Program ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Howard Brown Health Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Illinois Manufacturers' AssociationIL23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 1 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Illinois Manufacturers' Association · Chicago Cook Workforce Partnership · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 133 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce’s filings →

    More from the funding graph