Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Chicago Cook Workforce Partnership

The partnerships mission is to create, promote, and effectively manage a network of workforce development organizations that designs innovative solutions to address business needs and prepares individuals for, and connects them to, career opportunities.

$67M
Granted FY2025still arriving
98
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$9.6M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Employment$394MReligion$23MCommunity Improvement$12MEducation$12MHuman Services$11MCrime & Legal$5.1MScience & Tech$4.7MAnimals$3.9MOther$0
02FY2025 · 98 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k18 grants · $450k
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $3.5M
  • $250k+57 grants · $63M
$310,474
Median grant
7
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ISTS$9,614,828
EdAssist$7,067,642
Employment & Employer Services$5,498,967
National Able Network$4,219,724
Central State Ser$2,857,894
Business and Career Services$2,411,615
Equus$2,056,727
Calumet Area Industrial Commission$1,833,749
Greater West Town Project$1,551,105
YWCA Metropolitan Chicago$1,203,670
OAI$1,199,388
KRA Corporation$1,112,797
Pyramid partnership$1,061,001
Phalanx$1,051,737
Chicago Federation of Labor Workers$1,011,010
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $56.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $1.2M → 8%Metropolitan Family Services: $883k → 8%Metropolitan Family Services: $603k → 8%YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $1.5M → 14%YWCA Metropolitan Chicago: $1.2M → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $1.2M → 14%YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $1.1M → 14%YWCA Metropolitan Chicago: $1.1M → 14%YWCA Metropolitan Chicago: $820k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $561k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $553k → 14%LATINO RESOURCE INSTITUTE OF ILLINOIS: $858k → 14%Metropolitan Family Services: $816k → 14%LATINO RESOURCE INSTITUTE OF ILLINOIS: $614k → 14%INSTITUTO DEL PROGRESSO LATINO: $786k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS: $633k → 14%POLISH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $504k → 14%GOODWILL INDUSTRIES: $719k → 14%ASIAN HUMAN SERVICES-YOUTH PROGRAM: $740k → 14%HOWARD AREA COMMUNITY CENTER-YOUTH PROGRAM: $544k → 14%SGA: $1.1M → 14%SGA: $862k → 14%SGA: $713k → 14%SGA: $682k → 14%SGA: $560k → 14%U-Can: $543k → 14%U-Can: $411k → 14%ADA S MCKINLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $864k → 14%MARRIOTT FOUNDATION: $744k → 14%Food Hero: $716k → 14%MARRIOTT FOUNDATION: $633k → 14%ADA S MCKINLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $629k → 14%MARRIOTT FOUNDATION: $571k → 14%Food Hero: $530k → 14%MARRIOTT FOUNDATION: $530k → 14%GOODWILL INDUSTRIES: $511k → 14%Marriott Foundation: $470k → 14%MARRIOTT FOUNDATION: $432k → 14%PHALANX: $1.3M → 14%Phalanx: $1.3M → 14%Phalanx: $1.2M → 14%Phalanx: $1.1M → 14%PHALANX: $848k → 14%PHALANX FAMILY SERVICES: $458k → 14%South Suburban College: $563k → 14%South Suburban College: $523k → 14%SOUTH SUBURBAN COLLEGE: $438k → 14%SOUTH SUBURBAN COLLEGE: $433k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
TN
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$471M · 122 repeat orgs$18M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

122 repeat relationships — 69 still active in FY2025, 53 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

122
96

Total granted

$471M
$5.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
0%

Still filing today

68%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEmploymentCommunity ImprovementEducationHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GW
    GREATER WEST TOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12M · revenue +5% · 55% of their budget
  • CA
    CALUMET AREA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10M · revenue +216% · 41% of their budget
  • CS
    CENTRAL STATES SER JOBS FOR PROGRESS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9.6M · revenue +53% · 69% of their budget

Funded once

  • SF
    SAFER FOUNDATION - AFFILIATE CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $836k
  • MC
    McDermott Center
    one grant, 2021 · $367k · revenue -4%
  • NP
    NEW PISGAH COMMUNITY SERVICE ORGANIZATION
    one grant, 2021 · $330k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Workers' Collaborative Nfp

Chicago Workers' Collaborative's mission is to promote full employment and equality for the lowest wage-earners, primarily temporary staffing workers, in the Chicago region through leadership and skills training, critical assistance and…

Education
2
Chicago Jobs Council

Chicago Jobs Council (CJC) pursues its mission through advocacy, applied research, public education and capacity-building initiatives focused on influencing the development or reform of public policies and programs. From 18 original…

—
3
Local Economic and Employment Development Council Inc

North Branch Works is a membership-supported nonprofit neighborhood organization that for more than three decades has promoted balanced, job-creating economic development along the North Branch of the Chicago River.

Employment
4
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
5
Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce

The chicagoland chamber of commerce combines the power of people, with our legacy of leadership and business advocacy, to drive a dynamic economy. we focus on delivering value for our members, making chicagoland a world-class place to live…

—
6
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
7
The Workforce Connection Inc

The mission of the workforce connection board is to create a competitive, skilled and educated workforce by providing a system for individuals to gain meaningful employment responsive to the needs of business.

Employment
8
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
9
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
10
Employ Milwaukee Inc

The mission of employ milwaukee, inc. is to build a strong workforce development system by planning, coordinating, collaborating and monitoring workforce initiatives with businesses, partners and community stakeholders at the local,…

Employment
11
The Veterans Exchange

Employment support and exchange for veterans

—
12
Infant Welfare Society of Chicago

Infant welfare society of chicago (iws) (d/b/a iws family health) provides quality medical, dental and behavioral health services for the health, physical and mental development of children and their families in the chicagoland community.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Moms Inc and the most unlike its peers is Melanated Midwives Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr18%7%10–20yr17%36%20–35yr15%34%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr18%4%10–20yr17%41%20–35yr15%39%35–55yr16%16%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%2/242
the rest of the field
16%
4,998/31,268

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

110 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 110 of the 245 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

22
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
107/110
Grantees still filing
80/110
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EdAssist — $101,914,333 · OtherEdAssistEmployment & Employer Services — $37,560,121 · OtherEmployment & Employer ServicesNATIONAL ABLE NETWORK INC — $35,425,562 · OtherNATIONAL ABLE NETWORK INCEQUUS WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS — $13,964,399 · OtherSerco — $13,653,295 · OtherGREATER WEST TOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT — $11,929,727 · Other+132 more — $133,840,049 · Other+132 moreMetropolitan Family Services — $6,826,288 · Human ServicesMetropolitan …PHALANX FAMILY SERVICES — $6,806,575 · Human ServicesPHALANX FAMIL…YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $5,868,772 · Human ServicesYWCA METROPOL…SGA YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES NFP — $4,442,115 · Human ServicesSGA YOUTH & F…Inspiration Corporation — $4,313,859 · Human ServicesInspiration C…Bridges from School to Work Inc — $4,113,717 · Human ServicesBridges from …INSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS — $3,017,171 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE FOR…GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC — $2,901,989 · Human ServicesUCAN — $2,798,784 · Human ServicesASIAN HUMAN SERVICES — $2,257,161 · Human ServicesPOLISH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION — $2,221,774 · Human ServicesNEW MOMS INC — $2,147,648 · Human ServicesPROVISO-LEYDEN COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $1,905,091 · Human Services+11 more — $6,621,150 · Human Services+11 moreCALUMET AREA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION — $10,410,979 · EmploymentChicago Federation of Labor Workforce and Community Initiative — $6,450,346 · EmploymentJANE ADDAMS RESOURCE CORPORATION — $4,823,602 · EmploymentOAI Inc — $3,834,597 · EmploymentNORTH LAWNDALE EMPLOYMENT NETWORK — $1,739,800 · EmploymentSKILLS FOR CHICAGO — $1,576,174 · EmploymentANNE ARUNDEL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,275,506 · Employment+11 more — $7,779,872 · EmploymentBUSINESS AND CAREER SERVICES INC — $16,836,466 · EducationKLEO Community Family Life Center — $3,452,574 · EducationSCALELIT FKA CHICAGO CITYWIDE LITERACY COALITION — $3,269,894 · EducationYOUTH CONNECTION CHARTER SCHOOL — $2,353,712 · EducationYouth Guidance — $2,316,068 · Education+2 more — $735,314 · EducationCHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC — $1,978,452 · Community ImprovementSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT — $1,469,440 · Community ImprovementEnvision Community Services — $1,367,883 · Community ImprovementTHE CENTER OF WORKFORCE INNOVATIONS INC — $841,515 · Community ImprovementP33 — $762,875 · Community ImprovementGREATER AUBURN GRESHAM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $336,498 · Community Improvement+2 more — $186,660 · Community ImprovementThe Resurrection Project — $2,798,419 · Housing & ShelterWESTSIDE HEALTH AUTHORITY — $1,721,600 · Housing & ShelterSt Paul Church of God In Chris Community Development Ministrie — $567,128 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $77,912 · Housing & ShelterSafer Foundation — $5,067,107 · Crime & Legal
Other$348,287,486Human Services$56,242,094Employment$37,890,876Education$28,964,028Community Improvement$6,943,323Housing & Shelter$5,165,059Crime & Legal$5,067,107

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL ABLE NETWORK INC — $35,425,562 over 9y, 54% of budgetBUSINESS AND CAREER SERVICES INC — $16,836,466 over 9y, 94% of budgetGREATER WEST TOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT — $11,929,727 over 9y, 55% of budgetCALUMET AREA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION — $10,410,979 over 9y, 41% of budgetCENTRAL STATES SER JOBS FOR PROGRESS INC — $9,555,240 over 9y, 69% of budgetALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS NETWORK — $8,339,704 over 9y, 15% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services — $6,826,288 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetPHALANX FAMILY SERVICES — $6,806,575 over 9y, 12% of budgetChicago Federation of Labor Workforce and Community Initiative — $6,450,346 over 9y, 27% of budgetYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $5,868,772 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetSafer Foundation — $5,067,107 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetJANE ADDAMS RESOURCE CORPORATION — $4,823,602 over 9y, 27% of budgetSGA YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES NFP — $4,442,115 over 9y, 7.5% of budgetInspiration Corporation — $4,313,859 over 9y, 24% of budgetBridges from School to Work Inc — $4,113,717 over 9y, 8.8% of budgetOAI Inc — $3,834,597 over 6y, 22% of budgetLawrence Hall — $3,707,887 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetNATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER — $3,565,549 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetKLEO Community Family Life Center — $3,452,574 over 5y, 43% of budgetSCALELIT FKA CHICAGO CITYWIDE LITERACY COALITION — $3,269,894 over 5y, 55% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS — $3,017,171 over 8y, 10% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC — $2,901,989 over 5y, 41% of budgetHabilitative Systems Inc — $2,897,631 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetPRAIRIE STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $2,858,167 over 8y, 83% of budgetUCAN — $2,798,784 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetThe Resurrection Project — $2,798,419 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetPUERTO RICAN CULTURAL CENTER — $2,771,981 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetYOUTH JOB CENTER INC — $2,758,668 over 9y, 29% of budgetCENTERS FOR NEW HORIZONS INC — $2,450,648 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetYOUTH CONNECTION CHARTER SCHOOL — $2,353,712 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetCENTRAL MINNESOTA JOBS AND TRAINING SERVICES INC — $2,352,390 over 4y, 27% of budgetYouth Guidance — $2,316,068 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetASIAN HUMAN SERVICES — $2,257,161 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC — $2,225,395 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetPOLISH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION — $2,221,774 over 9y, 12% of budgetNEW MOMS INC — $2,147,648 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetMANUFACTURING RENAISSANCE FKA CENTER FOR LABOR AND COMMUN — $2,067,150 over 6y, 69% of budgetCHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC — $1,978,452 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetPROVISO-LEYDEN COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $1,905,091 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetNORTH LAWNDALE EMPLOYMENT NETWORK — $1,739,800 over 5y, 11% of budgetWESTSIDE HEALTH AUTHORITY — $1,721,600 over 4y, 11% of budgetLatino Resource Institute of Illinois — $1,661,599 over 3y, 65% of budgetSKILLS FOR CHICAGO — $1,576,174 over 5y, 14% of budgetADA S MCKINLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $1,493,061 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSOUTH SIDE HELP CENTER INC — $1,473,016 over 3y, 31% of budgetSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT — $1,469,440 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetEnvision Community Services — $1,367,883 over 3y, 26% of budgetANNE ARUNDEL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,275,506 over 3y, 11% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL ABLE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds BUSINESS AND CAREER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WEST TOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CALUMET AREA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL STATES SER JOBS FOR PROGRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Family Services ↗
  • Who funds PHALANX FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Federation of Labor Workforce and Community Initiative ↗
  • Who funds YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Safer Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JANE ADDAMS RESOURCE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SGA YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES NFP ↗
  • Who funds Inspiration Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Bridges from School to Work Inc ↗
  • Who funds OAI Inc ↗
  • Who funds Lawrence Hall ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KLEO Community Family Life Center ↗
  • Who funds SCALELIT FKA CHICAGO CITYWIDE LITERACY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds Habilitative Systems Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UCAN ↗
  • Who funds The Resurrection Project ↗
  • Who funds PUERTO RICAN CULTURAL CENTER ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Metropo…Robert R McCormick Fo…Polk Bros Foundation …Circle of Service Fou…Lloyd a Fry FoundationGreater Chicago Food …ForefrontJohn D and Catherine …Fifth Third Chicagola…Visiting Nurse Associ…The Chicago Community…Illinois Coalition fo…
United Way of Metropolitan Chicago IncIL74.9× affinity45 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Circle of Service Foundation · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Greater Chicago Food Depository · Forefront · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Fifth Third Chicagoland Foundation · Visiting Nurse Association of Chicago (Aka) Vna Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Chicago Cook Workforce Partnership funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • The Workplace Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Bridges from School to Work Inc — 33% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 245 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home