Skip to content

· Public charity

Chicago Urban League

The Chicago Urban League works to foster economic empowerment, cultivate leadership, and dismantle systemic barriers in the effort to drive lasting equity and prosperity for Black Chicago.

$104k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.

Community Improvement$4.1MEmployment$327kEducation$152kHuman Services$129kHousing & Shelter$70kHealth$38kFood & Nutrition$35kArts & Culture$20kOther$0
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $68,750, the rows itemized in this filing. The $103,750 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $35,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DePaul University$10,000
Howard University$10,000
University of Southern Califo$10,000
Iowa State University$10,000
University of Michigan$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,250
North Carolina University$6,250
Akwa-Ibom State Polytechnic$6,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YMCA of Jefferson County: $20k → 15%CHRISTIAN COUNTY YMCA: $20k → 16%YWCA Metropolitan Chicago: $15k → 14%DBABurst Into Books: $25k → 14%JUREMA NICOLE GORHAM: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
MA
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
UT
MO
KY
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

2%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$104k · 4 repeat orgs$4.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
320

Total granted

$104k
$4.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+10%

Still filing today

50%
4%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BURST INTO BOOKS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $35k · revenue +59%
  • A
    AGRICULTURE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $35k
  • BL
    BUCKETZ LLC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $18k

Funded once

  • CT
    CHICAGO TREND
    one grant, 2021 · $150k
  • PF
    Premier Fitness Centers I
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
  • OO
    Om on the Range Yoga Studio
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Men's Christian Association of Southeast Texas

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

Human Services
2
Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Washington

The young men's christian association of metropolitan washington (ymca) responds to critical youth, teen and family issues with therapeutic, counseling and developmental programs, including truancy prevention, teen pregnancy counseling and…

Human Services
3
Young Men's Christian Association of Honolulu

Strengthening communities is the y's cause through programs and services focused on youth development, healthy living and social responsibility.

Human Services
4
Young Men's Christian Association of East Tennessee Inc

To put christian principles into practice through programs and activities that develop the spirit, mind and body of youth, adults and families in knoxville, tn and surrounding communities. the ymca encourages growth for youth development,…

Human Services
5
The Young Men's Christian Association of Hastings Nebraska

The hastings family ymca puts christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirits, minds, and bodies for all.

Human Services
6
The Ymca of Metropolitan Chicago

One of the region's largest and most established impact-driven organizations, the YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago is committed to strengthening community by connecting all people to their purpose, potential, and each other. Central to the Y's…

Human Services
7
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
8
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Indianapolis

The mission of the ymca is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

Human Services
9
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
10
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
11
Young Men's Christian Assoc of Shawnee Ok

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
12
Illinois Valley Ymca

To put christian principles into practice that build a healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dixon Family Ymca; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 332 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO TREND: $150,000 · Other+188 more: $3,334,822 · Other+188 moreBURST INTO BOOKS: $35,000 · Human ServicesThe YMCA of Jefferson County: $20,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $15,000 · Human ServicesFAR SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $15,000 · Community ImprovementIGNITE TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION INC: $15,000 · Community ImprovementCHICAGO NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVES INC: $15,000 · Community ImprovementCHICAGO'S SUNSHINE ENTERPRISES INC: $12,000 · Community ImprovementTHOUSAND WAVES FOUNDATION NFP: $20,000 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $15,600 · EducationDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · Education
Other$3,484,822Human Services$90,000Community Improvement$57,000Education$45,600

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBURST INTO BOOKS: $35,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetTHOUSAND WAVES FOUNDATION NFP: $20,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetThe YMCA of Jefferson County: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BLOOMINGTON-NORMAL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Assoc of McDonough Co: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDIXON FAMILY YMCA: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $15,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAR SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetIGNITE TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCHICAGO NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO'S SUNSHINE ENTERPRISES INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BURST INTO BOOKS ↗
  • Who funds THOUSAND WAVES FOUNDATION NFP ↗
  • Who funds The YMCA of Jefferson County ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Women's Business Development CenterIL9.7× affinity19 shared granteesties to 4 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Women's Business Development Center · National Council of YMCAs of the USA · The Chicago Community Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chicago Urban League funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chicago Urban League. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 332 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $447k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chicago Urban League’s filings →

    More from the funding graph