Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chetcuti Evans Foundation Co Anna Albanice

The purpose of the michael chetcuti foundation is to conduct variousactivities, raising funds to make grants/contributions to other localorganizations which are organized, and operate, for charitable purposes.The organization currently conducts wine/beer tasting events toachieve the above purpose.

$28k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$23kArts & Culture$22kPhilanthropy$13kCivil Rights$11kEnvironment$10kHuman Services$6kFood & Nutrition$6kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
2
States reached
$19k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHPORT PROMISE$5,250
SAVE Foundation$5,000
LEELANAU CONSERVANCY - SUSTAINERS C$5,000
LEELANAU CHILDRENS CENTER$5,000
Leelanau Uncaged 2024$3,000
MICHAELS PLACE$1,000
NORTHPORT PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATI$1,000
FLOW - FOR LOVE OF WATER$750
Northport Omena Chamber of Commerce$500
NORTHPORT YOUTH SAILING SCHOOL$250
Community Foundation$250
The Friends of the Leelanau Tswp Li$250
Leelanau Children's Center$156
The ARC of NW Wayne County$150
NORTHPORT PROMISE$137
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%STAND WITH TRANS: $1k → 8%SHARECARE OF LEELANAU INC: $150 → 7%SHARECARE OF LEELANAU: $150 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$68k · 15 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
25

Total granted

$68k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+17%

Still filing today

60%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NORTHPORT ARTS ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2019–2022 · $18k · revenue +37%
  • 5
    5LOAVES2FISHNMI
    2× · 2022–2023 · $6k · revenue +134%
  • MP
    MICHAEL'S PLACE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • LA
    LOUD AND PROUDUP NORTH PRIDE
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • LC
    LEELANAU CONSERVANCY
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -75%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Little Traverse Conservancy Conservation Trust

To protect scenic and natural lands in northern Michigan.

—
2
Equality Michigan

To achieve full equality and respect for all michigan residents, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.

Civil Rights
3
Lake Leelanau Lake Association

The lake leelanau lake association is dedicated to protecting and enhancing the quality and beauty of lake leelanau and its surrounding watershed for current and future generations.

Environment
4
Great Lakes Center for the Arts

The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
5
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
6
Lake Superior Community Partnership Inc

To stimulate and sustain a vibrant regional economy by facilitating economic growth and prosperity.

—
7
Legacy Land Conservancy

Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever

Environment
8
Community Pride Mi
Public Benefit
9
Coalition to Protect Michigan Resources

The coalition to protect michigan resources's mission is to be a strong voice for the equitable co-management of michigan's fisheries, with both the great lakes and inland lakes and streams, to insure that conservation principles remain in…

Environment
10
Six Rivers Land Conservancy Fka Six Rivers Regional Land Conservancy

To conserve, sustain, and connect natural areas, land, and waters that make the places we live special

Environment
11
Lenawee Community Foundation

We connect people who care with causes that matter, bringing health, happiness, and hope to our community, now and forever.

Philanthropy
12
League of Michigan Bicyclists Inc

To promote bicycling and the rights of bicyclists on the roadways in michigan.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan; the most unlike its peers is 5LOAVES2FISHNMI. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $5,631 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLEELANAU CONSERVANCY - SUSTAINERS C: $5,500 · OtherLEELANAU CONSERVANCY - SUSTAINERS CLOUD AND PROUDUP NORTH PRIDE: $5,000 · OtherLOUD AND PROUDUP NORTH PRIDELeelanau Uncaged 2024: $3,000 · OtherLeelanau Uncaged 2024Individual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFLORIDA AIDS WALK: $2,400 · OtherFLORIDA AIDS WALK+30 more: $18,110 · Other+30 moreNORTHPORT PROMISE: $11,682 · EducationNORTHPORT PROMISELEELANAU CHILDREN'S CENTER: $10,156 · EducationLEELANAU CHILDREN'S CENT…NORTHPORT ARTS ASSOCIATION: $18,198 · Arts & CultureNORTHPORT ARTS ASSOC…5LOAVES2FISHNMI: $5,500 · Food & NutritionSAVE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $500 · Civil RightsLEELANAU CONSERVANCY: $2,660 · EnvironmentFOR LOVE OF WATER: $1,500 · EnvironmentMICHAEL'S PLACE: $4,000 · Health
Other$42,141Education$21,838Arts & Culture$18,198Food & Nutrition$5,500Civil Rights$5,500Environment$4,160Health$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHPORT ARTS ASSOCIATION: $18,198 over 2y, 12% of budgetNORTHPORT PROMISE: $11,682 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetLEELANAU CHILDREN'S CENTER: $10,156 over 3y, 0.6% of budget5LOAVES2FISHNMI: $5,500 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetSAVE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMICHAEL'S PLACE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLEELANAU CONSERVANCY: $2,660 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOR LOVE OF WATER: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHPORT YOUTH SAILING SCHOOL: $1,250 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNORTE YOUTH CYCLING: $1,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRUTH ELLIS CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStand With Trans: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $772 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAVING BIRDS THRU HABITAT: $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetShareCare of Leelanau Inc: $300 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHPORT ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHPORT PROMISE ↗
  • Who funds LEELANAU CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds 5LOAVES2FISHNMI ↗
  • Who funds SAVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHAEL'S PLACE ↗
  • Who funds LEELANAU CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds FOR LOVE OF WATER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHPORT YOUTH SAILING SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NORTE YOUTH CYCLING ↗
  • Who funds RUTH ELLIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Stand With Trans ↗
  • Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds LEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVING BIRDS THRU HABITAT ↗
  • Who funds LEELANAU REACH ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds ShareCare of Leelanau Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Traverse Regional Community FoundationMI19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation · Leelanau Township Community Foundation · Philip S Harper Foundation · Oleson Foundation · Rotary Charities of Traverse City · Green Brick Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chetcuti Evans Foundation Co Anna Albanice funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chetcuti Evans Foundation Co Anna Albanice. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chetcuti Evans Foundation Co Anna Albanice’s filings →

    More from the funding graph