· Private foundation
Chetcuti Evans Foundation Co Anna Albanice
The purpose of the michael chetcuti foundation is to conduct variousactivities, raising funds to make grants/contributions to other localorganizations which are organized, and operate, for charitable purposes.The organization currently conducts wine/beer tasting events toachieve the above purpose.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTHPORT PROMISE | $5,250 |
| LEELANAU CHILDRENS CENTER | $5,000 |
| LEELANAU CONSERVANCY - SUSTAINERS C | $5,000 |
| SAVE Foundation | $5,000 |
| Leelanau Uncaged 2024 | $3,000 |
| MICHAELS PLACE | $1,000 |
| NORTHPORT PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATI | $1,000 |
| FLOW - FOR LOVE OF WATER | $750 |
| Northport Omena Chamber of Commerce | $500 |
| The Friends of the Leelanau Tswp Li | $250 |
| NORTHPORT YOUTH SAILING SCHOOL | $250 |
| Community Foundation | $250 |
| Leelanau Children's Center | $156 |
| The ARC of NW Wayne County | $150 |
| NORTHPORT PROMISE | $137 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NANORTHPORT ARTS ASSOCIATION2× · 2019–2022 · $18k · revenue +37%
- 55LOAVES2FISHNMI2× · 2022–2023 · $6k · revenue +134%
- MPMICHAEL'S PLACE2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- LALOUD AND PROUDUP NORTH PRIDEone grant, 2019 · $5k
- LCLEELANAU CONSERVANCYone grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -75%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To protect scenic and natural lands in northern Michigan.
To achieve full equality and respect for all michigan residents, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.
The lake leelanau lake association is dedicated to protecting and enhancing the quality and beauty of lake leelanau and its surrounding watershed for current and future generations.
The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.
Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…
To stimulate and sustain a vibrant regional economy by facilitating economic growth and prosperity.
Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever
The coalition to protect michigan resources's mission is to be a strong voice for the equitable co-management of michigan's fisheries, with both the great lakes and inland lakes and streams, to insure that conservation principles remain in…
To conserve, sustain, and connect natural areas, land, and waters that make the places we live special
We connect people who care with causes that matter, bringing health, happiness, and hope to our community, now and forever.
To promote bicycling and the rights of bicyclists on the roadways in michigan.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan and the most unlike its peers is 5LOAVES2FISHNMI. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTHPORT ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHPORT PROMISE ↗
- Who funds LEELANAU CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds 5LOAVES2FISHNMI ↗
- Who funds SAVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MICHAEL'S PLACE ↗
- Who funds LEELANAU CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds FOR LOVE OF WATER ↗
- Who funds NORTHPORT YOUTH SAILING SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NORTE YOUTH CYCLING ↗
- Who funds RUTH ELLIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds Stand With Trans ↗
- Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds SAVING BIRDS THRU HABITAT ↗
- Who funds LEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds LEELANAU REACH ↗
- Who funds ShareCare of Leelanau Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation · Leelanau Township Community Foundation · Philip S Harper Foundation · Oleson Foundation · Rotary Charities of Traverse City · Green Brick Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Chetcuti Evans Foundation Co Anna Albanice funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.