Loading…
Loading…
New York · Nonprofit
Institute for Global Affairs Inc (New York) is funded by 6 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $550,912 in grants to it, the largest being Charles Koch Institute ($225,062). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Institute for Global Affairs Inc is better cushioned than half of the 1,483 international nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,483 international nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
98% of Institute for Global Affairs Inc’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (97% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $10k → $50k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
3 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 58% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Institute for Global Affairs Inc’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
Institute for Global Affairs Inc leans on a few funders — its largest provides 41% of grant income and the top three 90%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 77% · 2021 68% · 2022 94% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
Institute for Global Affairs Inc draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside New York — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 5 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
57% of spending goes to programs.
77%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 38 states
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing