Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles E Scheidt Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$763k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$4.4MInternational$3.0MArts & Culture$1.6MCrime & Legal$165kPhilanthropy$50kCivil Rights$43kRecreation & Sports$32kPublic Benefit$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $339k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
$36,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT$762,860
AUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE$349,917
AUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE$234,675
LEO BAECK INSTITUTE INC$200,000
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC$150,000
YESHIVA UNIVERSITY$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$97,400
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$90,000
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INCORPORATED$70,000
HIAS INC$54,000
LOWER EAST SIDE TENEMENT MUSEUM$50,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$36,000
OLGA LENGYEL INSTITUTE FOR HOLOCAUST STUDIES AND H$36,000
HIAS INC$36,000
LOWER EAST SIDE TENEMENT MUSEUM$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CLARK UNIVERSITY: $100k → 11%CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $94k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $97k → 14%FRACTURED ATLAS INC: $45k → 9%LEO BAECK INSTITUTE INC: $200k → 17%FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT: $763k → 20%UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $70k → 11%STOCKTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $60k → 11%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $150k → 6%UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $60k → 7%CLARK UNIVERSITY: $100k → 11%CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $50k → 14%LEO BAECK INSTITUTE INC: $200k → 17%FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT: $543k → 20%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $130k → 6%UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $60k → 7%LEO BAECK INSTITUTE INC: $200k → 17%FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT: $365k → 20%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $90k → 6%UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $50k → 7%LEO BAECK INSTITUTE INC: $200k → 17%FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT: $325k → 20%LEO BAECK INSTITUTE INC: $90k → 17%FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT: $325k → 20%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY - SCHOOL OF LAW: $90k → 17%HIAS INC: $91k → 17%YESHIVA UNIVERSITY - BENJAMIN N CARDOZO SCHOOL OF: $125k → 17%YESHIVA UNIVERSITY - BENJAMIN N CARDOZO SCHOOL OF: $125k → 17%YESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $100k → 17%YESHIVA UNIVERSITY - BENJAMIN N CARDOZO SCHOOL OF: $75k → 17%YESHIVA UNIVERSITY - BENJAMIN N CARDOZO SCHOOL OF: $50k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $90k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $90k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $90k → 17%LOWER EAST SIDE TENEMENT MUSEUM: $50k → 17%PRO PUBLICA INC: $90k → 17%PRO PUBLICA INC: $50k → 17%AUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE: $402k → 17%AUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE: $402k → 17%AUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE: $350k → 17%AUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE: $235k → 17%AUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE: $168k → 17%AUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE: $150k → 17%AUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE: $150k → 17%AUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE: $80k → 17%AUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE: $75k → 17%AUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE: $65k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
MN
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Charles E Scheidt Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Charles E Scheidt Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 14% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.7M · 21 repeat orgs$508k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
9

Total granted

$8.7M
$252k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+5%

Still filing today

81%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $256k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureInternationalPublic BenefitHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    AUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE AND MASS ATROCITIES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +118%
  • LB
    LEO BAECK INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $928k · revenue +65%
  • IR
    INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $425k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • NY
    NEW YORK UNIVERSITY - SCHOOL OF LAW
    one grant, 2020 · $90k
  • FRACTURED ATLAS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $45k · revenue +5%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Council of Independent Colleges

The council of independent colleges is an association of nonprofit independent colleges and universities, state- based councils of independent colleges, and other higher education affiliates, that works to support college and university…

—
7
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
8
Wesleyan University

Wesleyan university is dedicated to providing an education in liberal arts by building a diverse, energetic community of students, faculty, and staff who value independence of mind and generosity of spirit. see additional description in…

Education
9
Columbia University Press

Enhance Columbia University's education mission by acquiring and publishing outstanding original works by scholars and others that contribute to an understanding of global human concerns. Columbia University Press became part of the…

Arts & Culture
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

—
12
World Learning Inc

Creating a more sustainable, peaceful, and just world through education, development, and exchange since 1932. as both an accredited academic institution and an international ngo, world learning, inc. offers the best of theory and practice…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stockton University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Beacon Leadership Collaborative Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
22/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC: $2,320,865 · EducationFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW …GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $390,000 · EducationGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCNew York University: $270,000 · EducationNew York UniversityTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY+4 more: $328,400 · Education+4 moreAUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE AND MASS ATROCITIES: $2,094,817 · InternationalAUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PR…HIAS INC: $211,229 · InternationalHIAS INCTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $209,000 · InternationalTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORT…+1 more: $25,000 · InternationalLEO BAECK INSTITUTE INC: $928,000 · OtherLEO BAECK INSTITUTE INCYESHIVA UNIVERSITY - BENJAMIN N CARDOZO SCHOOL OF: $375,000 · OtherYESHIVA UNIVERSITY - BENJ…UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $258,808 · OtherUNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF NEW …STOCKTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $239,680 · OtherSTOCKTON UNIVERSITY FOUND…NEW YORK UNIVERSITY - SCHOOL OF LAW: $90,000 · Other+10 more: $217,700 · Other+10 moreThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $150,000 · Arts & CultureORPHEUS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC: $150,000 · Arts & CultureLOWER EAST SIDE TENEMENT MUSEUM: $140,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA INC: $140,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC: $425,000 · Human ServicesSTO TE NEMA Inc: $50,000 · PhilanthropyASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY: $25,000 · Public BenefitBEACON LEADERSHIP COLLABORATIVE INC: $25,000 · Public Benefit
Education$3,509,265International$2,540,046Other$2,109,188Arts & Culture$625,000Human Services$425,000Philanthropy$50,000Public Benefit$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC: $2,320,865 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetAUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE AND MASS ATROCITIES: $2,094,817 over 5y, 17% of budgetLEO BAECK INSTITUTE INC: $928,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC: $425,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $390,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNew York University: $270,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTOCKTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $239,680 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetHIAS INC: $211,229 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $209,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $150,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetORPHEUS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC: $150,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetLOWER EAST SIDE TENEMENT MUSEUM: $140,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $140,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $97,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OLGA LENGYEL INSTITUTE FOR HOLOCAUST STUDIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS: $61,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetSTO TE NEMA Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 77% of budgetTHE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $45,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATORS INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN: $25,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetPACIFIC CREST TRAIL ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADIRONDACK MOUNTAIN CLUB INC: $16,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany IncNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles E Scheidt Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles E Scheidt Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Trustees of Clark University: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles E Scheidt Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph