Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles E and Barbara A Zidek Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$280kEducation$88kPublic Safety & Disaster$75kHuman Services$73kReligion$73kInternational$65kFood & Nutrition$55kHousing & Shelter$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $115k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Catholic Relief Services$30,000
Misericordia$30,000
Hesed House$15,000
AMVETS National Service Foundation$10,000
Alzheimer's Association$10,000
Destiny Rescue$10,000
Northern Illinois Food Bank$10,000
Field Museum$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%4 Paws for Ability: $5k → 9%One Simple Wish: $3k → 11%Midwest Shelter for Homeless Veterans: $3k → 7%Hesed House: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
WV
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$378k · 10 repeat orgs$469k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
43

Total granted

$378k
$424k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+17%

Still filing today

50%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $58k · revenue +31%
  • NI
    NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK
    3× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +8%
  • LI
    LOVE146 INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • AL
    Advocate Lutheran Genenal Hospital
    one grant, 2018 · $72k
  • LU
    LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +6%
  • AH
    Advocate Health Charitable Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
2
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
3
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
4
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
5
Leashes of Valor

Our organization's mission is to raise awareness for and provide physical aid and support to disabled us military veterans. our program covers a crucial gap in the industry-a veteran operated organization, that can assist veterans with…

Public Benefit
6
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
7
Amvets (American Veterans)

Amvets is a veterans service organization whose members, having served or now serving in the u.s. armed forces, are united to uphold and defend the constitution of the united states; to safeguard the principles of freedom, liberty and…

—
8
Shelter From the Storm Animal Rescue Inc

Reduce the euthanasia rate of healthy and adoptable animals and improve the lives of companion animals by finding permanent homes for animals in need, providing support to communities who do not have access to humane organizations,…

—
9
Chicago Canine Rescue Foundation

Chicago canine rescue foundation finds permanent homes for homeless dogs in our community with a specific emphasis on assisting the most vulnerable animals, who without our help, would have no other options. while in our care, they are…

Animals
10
Alaqua Animal Refuge Inc

To be a leading advocate for all animals, to maximize the healing power animals have on the human spirit, and to provide shelter, safety, and second chances to animals in need.

Animals
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midwest Shelter for Homeless Veterans Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rover Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
24/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Lutheran General Hospital: $95,000 · OtherLutheran General HospitalAdvocate Lutheran Genenal Hospital: $72,000 · OtherAdvocate Lutheran Genenal HospitalCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $55,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESMisericordia: $40,000 · OtherMisericordiaLittle Sisters of the Poor: $35,000 · OtherLittle Sisters of the PoorAdvocate Health Charitable Foundation: $25,000 · Other+37 more: $296,500 · Other+37 moreDOMINICAN UNIVERSITY: $57,500 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $25,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House Global: $10,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $3,000 · HealthNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $40,000 · Food & NutritionDUPAGE PADS INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterWINGS PROGRAM INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $7,000 · Housing & ShelterPUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE: $15,000 · Human Services4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesONE SIMPLE WISH INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesMIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesLOVE146 INC: $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$618,500Education$57,500Health$48,000Food & Nutrition$40,000Housing & Shelter$37,000Human Services$26,000Crime & Legal$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDOMINICAN UNIVERSITY: $57,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE146 INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDUPAGE PADS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCoalition Against Trafficking In Women: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWINGS PROGRAM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMVETS NATIONAL SERVICE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetECPAT-USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANDERSON ANIMAL SHELTER: $5,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTINY N TALL RESCUE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE SIMPLE WISH INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARMY EMERGENCY RELIEF: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST SOPHIAS FORGOTTEN FELINES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetROVER RESCUE INC: $750 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LOVE146 INC ↗
  • Who funds DUPAGE PADS INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
  • Who funds Coalition Against Trafficking In Women ↗
  • Who funds WINGS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMVETS NATIONAL SERVICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ECPAT-USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDERSON ANIMAL SHELTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL18.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles E and Barbara A Zidek Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles E and Barbara A Zidek Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • LOVE146 Inc: 49% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles E and Barbara A Zidek Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph