Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles B Israel Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2018
40
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Religion$12kHealth$7kArts & Culture$3kEducation$2kEnvironment$2kAnimals$1kHuman Services$800Recreation & Sports$550Other$0
02FY2018 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
1
States reached
$367k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED JEWISH APPEAL$5,000
ASPEN MUSIC FESTIVAL AND SCHOOL$1,100
ASPEN JEWISH CONGREGATION ASPEN CO$1,000
ASPEN VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION$1,000
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$750
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO$500
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$500
MD ANDERSON CANCER RESEARCH$500
WINDWALKERS THERAPY CENTER$350
ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL$250
DUCKS UNLIMITED$250
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$250
ASPEN HOPE CENTER$250
SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS$250
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $400) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $250 → 6%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $150 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24k · 25 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
18

Total granted

$24k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+27%

Still filing today

32%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Arts & CultureHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +141%
  • NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +50%
  • AH
    ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $400 · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • RF
    ROARING FORK CONSERVANCYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $750 · revenue +27%
  • AV
    ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $650
  • CU
    CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
2
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
3
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
4
Boulder Philharmonic Orchestra

The mission of the boulder philharmonic orchestra is to enrich connections and communities through the power of orchestral music. the boulder philharmonic orchestra presents performances that reflect our community's values, creativity, and…

Arts & Culture
5
Aspen Center for Environmental Studies

Aces' mission is to inspire a life-long commitment to the earth by providing innovative and immersive programming for all ages.

Environment
6
Roaring Fork Public Radio Inc

To support, nourish, and enrich our community by providing informative, entertaining and educational radio and digital programing in a reliable and professional manner.

—
7
Colorado Water Trust

To restore water to colorado's rivers.

Environment
8
San Juan Mountains Association

To empower visitors and locals to explore, learn about and protect the spectacular public lands of Southwest Colorado.

Environment
9
Bravo Colorado At Beaver Creek-Vail Inc Dba Bravo Vail Valley Music Festival

Enriching people's lives through the power of music.*producing the finest performances by the greatest artists*fostering music education, and*promoting a life-long appreciation for the arts

Arts & Culture
10
Jazz At Aspen-Snowmass

The mission of jazz aspen snowmass is to present and preserve jazz and related forms of music through world-class festivals, performances and education programs.

Arts & Culture
11
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
12
Public Broadcasting of Colorado Inc

To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rocky Mountain Public Media Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Audubon Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED JEWISH APPEAL: $10,000 · OtherUNITED JEWISH APPEALASPEN JEWISH CONGREGATION ASPEN CO: $2,000 · OtherASPEN JEWISH CONGREGATION ASPEN COASPEN VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $1,500 · OtherASPEN VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION+43 more: $11,100 · Other+43 moreMUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC: $1,900 · Arts & CultureMUSIC ASS…ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $300 · Arts & CultureROCKY MOU…Aspen Community Theatre: $150 · Arts & CultureAspen Com…THEATRE ASPEN: $125 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $1,500 · HealthASPEN HOPE CENTER: $400 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $150 · HealthA Way Out Inc: $100 · HealthROARING FORK CONSERVANCY: $750 · EnvironmentNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $300 · EnvironmentASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST: $300 · EnvironmentHOSPICE OF THE VALLEY INC: $250 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $150 · Human Services
Other$24,600Arts & Culture$2,475Health$2,150Environment$1,350Human Services$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROARING FORK CONSERVANCY: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN HOPE CENTER: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE VALLEY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAspen Community Theatre: $150 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATRE ASPEN: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Way Out Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds ROARING FORK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN HOPE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds Aspen Community Theatre ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aspen Community FoundationCO19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aspen Community Foundation · Arches Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · DJ Schneider Family Foundation Inc · Zanin Family Foundation · Ruth a Carver Foundation · The Thrift Shop · Aspen Business Center Foundation · Nm Morris Family Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles B Israel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles B Israel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles B Israel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph