· Private foundation
Nm Morris Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k95 grants · $189k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $104k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VAIL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $37,000 |
| ACES ASPEN CTR FOR ENVIORNMENTAL ST | $20,000 |
| BOYS GIRLS CLUB NORTHERN WESTCHESTE | $17,000 |
| ASPEN VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ENDOCARE FUND | $10,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE GUILD | $10,000 |
| ASPEN MIDDLE SCHOOL | $9,000 |
| ASPEN FAMILY CONNECTIONS | $9,000 |
| ASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST | $7,000 |
| VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| LATINO U COLLEGE ACCESS | $5,000 |
| CHESAPEAKE BAY MARITIME MUSEUM | $5,000 |
| MOUNTAIN VALLEY HORSE RESCUE | $5,000 |
| ASPEN VALLEY SKI SNOWBOARD CLUB | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $810k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
158 repeat relationships — 71 still active in FY2025, 87 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PBPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $400k · revenue +29%
- GEGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC8× · 2017–2024 · $371k · revenue +83%
- GHGREENWICH HOSPITAL8× · 2017–2024 · $81k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- AFASPEN FAMILY CONNECTIONone grant, 2022 · $10k
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -51%
- RSRevived Soldiers Ukraineone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
As a new york city based nonprofit, we're dedicated to transforming the health and well-being of our communities through inclusive and accessible running experiences, empowering all to achieve their potential.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…
Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vail Health Services Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Madelon Global Health Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
138 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 138 of the 265 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC ↗
- Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds SURPRISE LAKE CAMP ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LATINO U COLLEGE ACCESS INC ↗
- Who funds STEPPINGSTONE DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY MARITIME MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOB BEATTIE SKI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN VALLEY HORSE RESCUE ↗
- Who funds ITHACA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER ↗
- Who funds GUIDANCE CENTER OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds CARE FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds Eagle Rock Yacht Club Inc ↗
- Who funds HILLSIDE FOOD OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HEAVEN CAN WAIT ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds TREEPEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds Betty Ford Alpine Gardens ↗
- Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
- Who funds ISHA FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Aspen Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Aspen Business Center Foundation · Brady Foundation · Mbia Foundation · The Thrift Shop · Arches Foundation · Alpenglow Foundation · Fred and Elli Iselin Foundation · John & Jacolyn Bucksbaum Family Found · Gorman Foundation Charitable Trust · The Hunter Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nm Morris Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Clasp Homes Inc — 91% of income from government
- Operation Fuel Incorporated — 51% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum Inc — 17% of income from government
- Friends of Ambler Farm Inc — 7% of income from government
- Turn of River Fire Department Inc — 3% of income from government
- Westport Country Playhouse Inc — 2% of income from government
- Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
- Bruce Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
- Greenwich Hospital — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Nm Morris Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Nm Morris Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.